Why during UCF rebuilding years do we always look pathetic?

[C-MontCityKnight2]

GOL. Other teams might win 7 games and call it a rebuilding year. GOL will lose 8-10 games in this "rebuilding year". He needs to be fired.

 

[Boston.Knight]

GOL. Other teams might will 7 games and call it a rebuilding year. GOL will lose 8-10 games in this "rebuilding year". He needs to be fired.

There is some legitimacy to this question about why rebuiliding years are so bad. See my comments regarding "vanilla offense" and lack of ability to adapt.

Example: When they line up Nick Patti in the wild knight, everybody watching the game, even those not familiar with UCF playbook knows what is coming next. How about mix it up a little bit and have him actually PASS the ball. How about we try a fake and catch a team sleeping like an FIU where they pull back all their guys on a punt, and so on.

Going for it on 4th and 9 from the 38 is not the kind of 'creativity' that we need.

 

[KnightVision82]

Looking at standings is pretty depressing.

GOL looks bad when his players don't fit his single-minded game approach.
At game time, he's not able to adapt to what the other team is doing (like loading the
box against the run).

 

[Ucfmikes]

GOL. Other teams might win 7 games and call it a rebuilding year. GOL will lose 8-10 games in this "rebuilding year". He needs to be fired.

Google rebuilding year. It doesn't mean national championship. Einstein

Then Google UCF extremist. It's your new name

 

[Knight2000]

Don't all teams look bad when they're rebuilding? Pretty sure "rebuilding" is a marketing term for sucking

 

[firm_bizzle]

I thought last year was a "rebuilding year."

 

[Knight2000]

I thought last year was a "rebuilding year."

When you graduate tons of seniors and have the 3rd youngest team in FBS -- I'd call that rebuilding.