ADVERTISEMENT

Will Trump end the Korean War toknight!

UCFhonors

Todd's Tiki Bar
Feb 20, 2010
21,475
2,723
113
I still don’t understand why Regan didn’t end the war in 1989? N Korea was clearly using the threat of building nuclear weapons as a bargaining chip to open up trade and isolation.

When will we learn that George Washington was right. Trade discourages war. Trade restrictions encourages war.
 
I still don’t understand why Regan didn’t end the war in 1989? N Korea was clearly using the threat of building nuclear weapons as a bargaining chip to open up trade and isolation.

When will we learn that George Washington was right. Trade discourages war. Trade restrictions encourages war.

Only one thing ends a war: superior military firepower.


But to your point about washington, yes trade discourages war. At the same time, trade can only happen between 2 willing parties and as of yet we can't be sure that NK is willing. Their history shows that we should be skeptical of their intentions so unless something major changes i don't know about how effective being a trade partner would be
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
Lmao the moron can't even get out of a meeting without pissing off every single one of our closest allies, and you expect him to d nucleatize the Norks?

This is a 100% accurate caption of one of his speeches on nuclear energy.

Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.
 
Lmao the moron can't even get out of a meeting without pissing off every single one of our closest allies, and you expect him to d nucleatize the Norks?

This is a 100% accurate caption of one of his speeches on nuclear energy.

Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.


This brings a tear to my eye. Such grace in speech. Such elegance.


All I can do now, as a tribute to this great man, is go home and fly my murica flag and cheat on my wife. Then shoot something darker than me.
 
This brings a tear to my eye. Such grace in speech. Such elegance.


All I can do now, as a tribute to this great man, is go home and fly my murica flag and cheat on my wife. Then shoot something darker than me.

image-resizer
 
Only one thing ends a war: superior military firepower.


But to your point about washington, yes trade discourages war. At the same time, trade can only happen between 2 willing parties and as of yet we can't be sure that NK is willing. Their history shows that we should be skeptical of their intentions so unless something major changes i don't know about how effective being a trade partner would be
So if you're superior by 0.1%, then you will win the war? Hmmm think about that. What is winning?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT