Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A Democrat in the Virginia legislature proposes a bill that would have removed the existing restrictions on a third-trimester abortion. Guess what? It never saw the light of day -- it was killed in subcommittee before ever going to a vote. Yet THAT's the so-called 'fire lit under every red state?' SMH.The assertion of 'woman's rights' extend to 'abortion after birth' non-sense that started in Virginia and elsewhere pretty much lit a fire under every red state.
That's not what I'm talking about, and you know it. When you actually starte addressing what I'm actually talking about, we can have a conversation.A Democrat in the Virginia legislature proposes a bill that would have removed the existing restrictions on a third-trimester abortion.
You are the one who brought up Virginia not me. If it's not what you're talking about, please share with us all what you were actually talking about then.That's not what I'm talking about, and you know it. When you actually start addressing what I'm actually talking about, we can have a conversation.
When the Virginia governor made comments about terminations of young babies 5-10 days after birth due to defects, among others. It was not in the bill, no. Unfortunately, he was asserting ... in an interview ... on abortion and women's rights, and talking about the bill.You are the one who brought up Virginia not me. If it's not what you're talking about, please share with us all what you were actually talking about then.
First, did you mention the former Virginia Governor's interview in your earlier post? Was I supposed to read your mind?When the Virginia governor made comments about terminations of young babies 5-10 days after birth due to defects, among others. It was not in the bill, no. Unfortunately, he was asserting ... in an interview ... on abortion and women's rights, and talking about the bill.