In the ones that are recognized as major selectors UCF will be #1 in one or two. Which are the important ones.It's ok, we are #1 with at least (3) of them and only (1) is needed:
http://csnbbs.com/thread-839637.html
By insinuating they 'chickened out', are you suggesting there is an ability to modify formulas or variables to influence results?
By insinuating they 'chickened out', are you suggesting there is an ability to modify formulas or variables to influence results?
Are formulas / variables published to cross check their math?
I see, with formulas not posted, who's to say the weights placed on certain criteria aren't tweaked until the preferred results are generated.By "chickened out" I was insulting the P5 community. I'm guessing their formulas put a lot more weight for a 5 team barely beating a 2 team then a 1 team doing what it should. Still think it's strange since UCF was 1 after beating a low ranked Memphis and now we're a 2. Was really just hoping for someone to make the National Championship NCAA recognized. I have no idea if they changed anything to make a P5 king (probably not).
I think for Wolfe he didn’t update after the semis, thus Alabama got 2 games vs quality opponents to UCFs 1. Margin between 1 and 2 was razor thin. Like if Memphis beat ISU UCF is probably #1.By "chickened out" I was insulting the P5 community. I'm guessing their formulas put a lot more weight for a 5 team barely beating a 2 team then a 1 team doing what it should. Still think it's strange since UCF was 1 after beating a low ranked Memphis and now we're a 2. Was really just hoping for someone to make the National Championship NCAA recognized. I have no idea if they changed anything to make a P5 king (probably not).
I agree with this. Bama didnt play in the conference finals so didnt have anything to base it off of. Then the two games helped Bama.I think for Wolfe he didn’t update after the semis, thus Alabama got 2 games vs quality opponents to UCFs 1. Margin between 1 and 2 was razor thin. Like if Memphis beat ISU UCF is probably #1.
Wish Memphis wasn't so selfish and would have put the conference first.I think for Wolfe he didn’t update after the semis, thus Alabama got 2 games vs quality opponents to UCFs 1. Margin between 1 and 2 was razor thin. Like if Memphis beat ISU UCF is probably #1.
I think for Wolfe he didn’t update after the semis, thus Alabama got 2 games vs quality opponents to UCFs 1. Margin between 1 and 2 was razor thin. Like if Memphis beat ISU UCF is probably #1.
I think that it's very troubling that none of these computer ranking systems except for Colley Matrix publish their methodology and allow for scenario testing.By insinuating they 'chickened out', are you suggesting there is an ability to modify formulas or variables to influence results?
Are formulas / variables published to cross check their math?