Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good for business having him around.
They still have Facebook, youtube, instagram, and the comments section of almost every news channel and newspaper. So don’t feel too bad for them.They can start "untruth social" and die with all the other start up social media platforms
Twitter...creates traffic for sure. Truth social won't be around.
Sometimes you have to cut your losses. If Elon Musk’s Twitter is going to be viewed as being more fair, what’s the market projection for a startup in that space. You have to be dynamic in this day and age of business.But Truth Social is Trump's thing. Devin Nunes retired from congress to work there. Would be a terrible financial decision and he is going to screw people over if he just abandons it and goes back to twitter. He says he is staying on Truth Social, but I have a feeling that wont last.
Sometimes you have to cut your losses. If Elon Musk’s Twitter is going to be viewed as being more fair, what’s the market projection for a startup in that space. You have to be dynamic in this day and age of business.
Be interesting to find if some bots were actually twitter creating the narrative
Truth social is a public company. How much is he really invested?
What other news channels websites have comments sections? I've only seen it on Fox News; MSNBC, CNN, don't offer open comment sections...and the online papers require subscriptions.They still have Facebook, youtube, instagram, and the comments section of almost every news channel and newspaper. So don’t feel too bad for them.
You know what, I just assumed Vox, Salon, Mother Jones, MSNBC, CNN and the rest that front like they embrace open and honest discourse would have comment sections. But I just went and looked at an article at each and they don’t (or at least I didn’t see them). They all have social media feeds that list the articles, right? I guess that’s their plausible deniability for having comments sections without having them while still making fun of the people that post in FoxNews comment sections.What other news channels websites have comments sections? I've only seen it on Fox News; MSNBC, CNN, don't offer open comment sections...and the online papers require subscriptions.
Uhh, the last thing in the world I'd call the comments section on Fox is honest. It makes this shithole cesspool that is the Water Cooler look 100% normal.You do have to wonder at their sincerity in having open and honest conversations but not allowing for comments on their stories on their own websites.
It would be interesting to compare comments between the sites...if opinions were balanced /shared equally between groups of people, that should come out in the comments sections, obviously skew towards political leanings of the particular "news" website.Uhh, the last thing in the world I'd call the comments section on Fox is honest. It makes this shithole cesspool that is the Water Cooler look 100% normal.
I’ll take your word for it but wouldn’t that cesspool be a revelation of some people’s thoughts with the veneer of civility removed? Or is it just a bunch of people trolling to post the most vile things trying to get attention?Uhh, the last thing in the world I'd call the comments section on Fox is honest. It makes this shithole cesspool that is the Water Cooler look 100% normal.
It's a lot of trolling and shit posting, for sure. I mean I will be honest: some of the articles generate tens of thousands of comments, so I don't go through them all, obviously. But what I do read is your typical mixture of faceless internet screeching and trolling. Fox does moderate the comments for certain community standards, but it's a community dump in general.I’ll take your word for it but wouldn’t that cesspool be a revelation of some people’s thoughts with the veneer of civility removed? Or is it just a bunch of people trolling to post the most vile things trying to get attention?
Well, it should. But that's a YUGE conditional "if." I mean, you still have people/bots in the FOX comments who post "want to get rich overnight? click here!!!" nonsense.It would be interesting to compare comments between the sites...if opinions were balanced /shared equally between groups of people, that should come out in the comments sections, obviously skew towards political leanings of the particular "news" website.
I had read either CNN or MSNBC used to, but removed. It does make one wonder why that is.
...[CNN and MSNBC] These organizations probably just said eff it and removed them completely.
I dunno about that. When 2/3s of the comments are nothing than more than shit trolling, pro/con ratio isn't exactly of a concern....or, they're concerned with the pro/con ratio of user feedback. I've wanted to comment on some extreme left opinion articles on those sites as I do for extreme right opinion articles on Fox.
I've noticed many more radical left pieces over the past 2-3 years on CNN/MSNBC than radical right pieces on Fox, of course that's relative to how far back you establish your political spectrum baseline.
A private company should be allowed to moderate content according to their terms and conditions. It’s not just for civil discourse. Allowing inappropriate, hateful, spam content carte blanche has a negative effect on the bottom line as there is a more limited audience that is willing to tolerate unlimited unmoderated speech on a social media platform.Any open forum is going to be either right or left, and that is ok. There will be some, or a lot of garbage on all of them and that is ok. But an arguing opinion from the other side shouldn't be removed just because the majority side doesn't like it. Now if you are and advocate group, it is a bit of a different matter.
And that's been beyond proven to be totally bullshit at this point, but Big Tech has the Trust to destroy and obliterate any other site they want and take them off-line, which has been proven time and time again. That's no different than Standard Oil prior.A private company should be allowed to moderate content according to their terms and conditions. It’s not just for civil discourse. Allowing inappropriate, hateful, spam content carte blanche has a negative effect on the bottom line as there is a more limited audience that is willing to tolerate unlimited unmoderated speech on a social media platform.