This is huge. Published in the BMJ journal. I'm shocked they ran this. But that they did.
tldr: The entire phase III trial looks suspect at this point and was "helter skelter" with phony data, undisclosed protocol deviations, the works. If the vaccine were a drug, there would be lawsuits flying everywhere right now.
The woke libs talk nonstop about ivermectin, but you won't hear a peep from them on this 🤣
the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.
“I don’t think it was good clean data,” the employee said of the data Ventavia generated for the Pfizer trial. “It’s a crazy mess.”
tldr: The entire phase III trial looks suspect at this point and was "helter skelter" with phony data, undisclosed protocol deviations, the works. If the vaccine were a drug, there would be lawsuits flying everywhere right now.
The woke libs talk nonstop about ivermectin, but you won't hear a peep from them on this 🤣
the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.
“I don’t think it was good clean data,” the employee said of the data Ventavia generated for the Pfizer trial. “It’s a crazy mess.”
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open...
www.bmj.com
Last edited: