Doesn't seem that ridiculous. She isn't saying you can't use the terms. She's saying that the class is about studying differences in people, and being intolerant and purposely offensive is not tolerated.
are not acceptable
will not be tolerated
or referring to women/men as females or males
including but not limited to removal from the class without
attendance or participation points, failure of the assignment, and - in extreme cases - failure for the semester
Illegal alien is a 100% accurate term for someone in the country illegally. Male and female are proper terms to describe males and females in every facet of biology. Chemmie should teach a course on convolution.
This. How are using factually correct terms "offensive" or intolerant?
She's saying that the class is about studying differences in people
Nothing like a little starvation to render gender issues mootI love the term "gender assigned at birth" and how there is a strong movement to have this applied to everyone. There are extremely rare cases where gender is assigned at birth. For everyone else on the planet, gender is assigned at conception. The opinions of doctors and social activists have absolutely no bearing on that. We also do not need the new prefix "cis" added to the language to further divide people.
FUKC NO!!!! Illegal alien is a perfectly correct, non derrogatory term. Anybody that feels different is crazy.Yeah, this seems exaggerated ( if serious ).
It's only one school cited for this topic.
And the piece details that it isn't about calling a male a male, or female a female, but using the opposite gender to describe a person in a pejorative light.
I will grant you the stance on illegal alien.
FUKC NO!!!! Illegal alien is a perfectly correct, non derrogatory term. Anybody that feels different is crazy.
And why are we worried about offending individuals that have broken the law and crossed a border illegally? That's what I'm mostly confused about.
Serious answer? I'm a motherfukcing United States citizen. I was fukcing born that way, not some god damn wetback.Why do you have so much hostility towards your own people?
Serious answer? I hope your not fukcing stupid and know for a fukcing fact that Puerto Ricans are United States citizens.Looks like Jets is letting his anchor baby status go to his head.![]()
I will say that in the last two years they have changed our diversity training and sexual discrimination training, supposedly to comply with federal regulations. Its pretty offensive stuff if you are a man. One exercise told us that we had to stop and think about the times we have made women feel threatened of sexual assault, then write them down in the box provided. We didnt have to turn the worksheet in, but it started with the assumption that every man has either purposefully put women in fear of sexual assault or is somehow culpable for how another person feels. No use of the word "when you may have" or other qualifying language. The paragraph clearly and unequivocally was based on the premise that ALL American men are responsible for women feeling uncomfortable. One guy quit rather than complete the training, which is what the exercise has in mind, I imagine. He was replaced by a woman and there are no men in that department anymore.
I love the term "gender assigned at birth" and how there is a strong movement to have this applied to everyone. There are extremely rare cases where gender is assigned at birth. For everyone else on the planet, gender is assigned at conception. The opinions of doctors and social activists have absolutely no bearing on that. We also do not need the new prefix "cis" added to the language to further divide people.
I had to look up "CIS" ...
so since I was born a male and identify as a male I have to refer to myself as a "cismale" to be considered socially acceptable? W . T . F . people ? which one(s) of you actually communicate like this?
So basically you will be dealt with if you ask someone out on a date, crack a joke about someones fat ass, or inability to deep throat, look at someone, use a double entendre, or in anyway offend the hyper-sensitive feminists, who despite being fully capable and independent, collapse into a spiraling depression that leaves them broken and unable to function if they're offended or have their opinions challenged in any manner.I will say that in the last two years they have changed our diversity training and sexual discrimination training, supposedly to comply with federal regulations. Its pretty offensive stuff if you are a man. One exercise told us that we had to stop and think about the times we have made women feel threatened of sexual assault, then write them down in the box provided. We didnt have to turn the worksheet in, but it started with the assumption that every man has either purposefully put women in fear of sexual assault or is somehow culpable for how another person feels. No use of the word "when you may have" or other qualifying language. The paragraph clearly and unequivocally was based on the premise that ALL American men are responsible for women feeling uncomfortable. One guy quit rather than complete the training, which is what the exercise has in mind, I imagine. He was replaced by a woman and there are no men in that department anymore.
There are actually some dudes that take their wife's last name. These are probably the same wimps that agree to sit down to pee. My gawd this society is full of emasculated men.Fvck. Allowing brides to retain their maiden name through hyphenation
Pussy-in-chief:Social directives now counter actual biology and science in favor of inclusiveness. It is usually one of the first steps, historically, before a very heavy central push towards some sore of arbitrary Utopian vision those in power all happen to agree on.