Not exactly like Ohio State is a poor program, it's been mentioned by their own AD, they spent $20 million on the roster. Which may even be more than what Texas spent.SEC sucks. Texas sucks. Imagine having all that oil money and still sucking.
devaluing the regular season too.Not exactly like Ohio State is a poor program, it's been mentioned by their own AD, they spent $20 million on the roster. Which may even be more than what Texas spent.
This year set a bad precedent, Ohio State and Notre Dame both had bad losses and made finals without playing in conference championship. Blue bloods with bad losses will jump ahead of non blue bloods and they will try to devalue conference champions.
Nope. Notre Dame winning the National Championship after losing to a MAC school early is great for the sport and great for the regular season. Most recent regular seasons 95% of the games were meaningless to watch in November bc the 4 team field picture is usually in place. This season you had teams playing their way in on that final Saturday night.Not exactly like Ohio State is a poor program, it's been mentioned by their own AD, they spent $20 million on the roster. Which may even be more than what Texas spent.
This year set a bad precedent, Ohio State and Notre Dame both had bad losses and made finals without playing in conference championship. Blue bloods with bad losses will jump ahead of non blue bloods and they will try to devalue conference champions.
Yeah too bad most of them don't even play, besides maybe Griffin.
I follow the NFL and didn’t even realize he was on Minnesota now. UCF Program under Gus barely developed NFL talent. Portal complicates thingsYeah too bad most of them don't even play, besides maybe Griffin.
If this continues in college football, which I don't think it will, I believe many will flat out stop watching college football. If there are no salary caps you will only see the richest programs make it to the playoffs. At that point I'll just watch NFL aka pro football.Not exactly like Ohio State is a poor program, it's been mentioned by their own AD, they spent $20 million on the roster. Which may even be more than what Texas spent.
This year set a bad precedent, Ohio State and Notre Dame both had bad losses and made finals without playing in conference championship. Blue bloods with bad losses will jump ahead of non blue bloods and they will try to devalue conference champions.
Of course our super young university is not on there. Jesus.9 of those are B12. I wish our rich Alum liked sports.
The richest have always been the main ones who make it. I don't think it will affect ratings. I think the playoff will help ratings. Regardless of everything else.If this continues in college football, which I don't think it will, I believe many will flat out stop watching college football. If there are no salary caps you will only see the richest programs make it to the playoffs. At that point I'll just watch NFL aka pro football.
It’s like our 45k football stadium is supposed to complete or beat out the schools with 80-90k+ stadiums. We don’t have a long tradition of athletics (meaning all sports) being good and drawing crowds and generational support. These other schools do and have been around a hundred or more years.Of course our super young university is not on there. Jesus.
San Diego St is on there. How big is their stadium? They aren’t great in every sport. Making money today has nothing to do with being a school 100 years ago. Those people are dead.It’s like our 45k football stadium is supposed to complete or beat out the schools with 80-90k+ stadiums. We don’t have a long tradition of athletics (meaning all sports) being good and drawing crowds and generational support. These other schools do and have been around a hundred or more years.
Those people left behind money though. Generational wealth. Most schools listed are state flagships. It's weird seeing SDSU on here but no USC.San Diego St is on there. How big is their stadium? They aren’t great in every sport. Making money today has nothing to do with being a school 100 years ago. Those people are dead.
You can't really be this dumb. So how long a university has been around doesn't have anything to do with their revenue? I could just start a brand new one today and earn more than UCF in 2025?I’m pretty sure that tweet is revenue earning. For a year. Doesn’t count donations or anything earned 100 years ago.
You missed the point, as always. Stadium size was just one of the reasons. Generational fan interest, meaning each generation was brought up as a fan who pay money is the biggest factor when you look at that list. UCF has never had that.San Diego St is on there. How big is their stadium? They aren’t great in every sport. Making money today has nothing to do with being a school 100 years ago. Those people are dead.