Chuck Schumer threatens 2 sitting SCOTUS Justices

[DaShuckster]

I've already stated that Trump should not have done that, but there is a difference between making a stupid public statement and trying to intimidate a judge.

Come OOOOOOON, guys. Really? You're honestly saying there's a difference here?

Schumer spouts off his crap at a political pro-choice rally in Washington and Trump tweets his crap to millions of his followers. They are BOTH stupid statements and, at their heart, they are BOTH ham-handed attempts to intimidate.

To insinuate otherwise is disingenuous.

 

[Crazyhole]

Come OOOOOOON, guys. Really? You're honestly saying there's a difference here?

Schumer spouts off his crap at a political pro-choice rally in Washington and Trump tweets his crap to millions of his followers. They are BOTH stupid statements and, at their heart, they are BOTH ham-handed attempts to intimidate.

To insinuate otherwise is disingenuous.

Yeah they're both stupid, but suggesting that a judge can't be partial isnt the same as telling a judge if he rules a certain way "you wont know what hit you". Try that to your local judge and see how long it takes for the sheriff to have you in handcuffs.

 

[DaShuckster]

Yeah they're both stupid, but suggesting that a judge can't be partial isnt the same as telling a judge if he rules a certain way "you wont know what hit you".

….unless, I guess, you're the President of the United States.

You might ask Judge Amy Berman Jackson who presided over the Roger Stone case if she felt any pressure coming from the White House.

 

[Crazyhole]

….unless, I guess, you're the President of the United States.

You might ask Judge Amy Berman Jackson who presided over the Roger Stone case if she felt any pressure coming from the White House.

I thought she said it didnt affect her. I know she was unhappy about the juror tweet.

 

[DaShuckster]

I thought she said it didnt affect her. I know she was unhappy about the juror tweet.

If that's the criteria we're using, do you think Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanugh will say they were affected by Schumer's rant?

 

[Crazyhole]

If that's the criteria we're using, do you think Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanugh will say they were affected by Schumer's rant?

Probably not. I dont want schumer to be arrested, I just think the senate should sanction him because it was very inappropriate and as a body they have the authority to enforce their own rules of decorum. I also think they should have put out a public response to trump.

 

[UCFKnight85]

This all brought to you by the same people who tried to lie and push fake sexual assault stories to destroy a man’s career and a man’s family all so they could sink a Trump SCOTUS nominee