ADVERTISEMENT

CNN and Clinton campaign colluded on "town hall"

UCFKnight85

GOL's Inner Circle
Gold Member
May 6, 2003
99,584
105,001
113
Yes, this is a new thread. Simply because many of these leaks are worthy of their own threads.

At least this proves that these Clinton "town halls" were complete bullshit, and, that the media absolutely IS in the tank for her, and actually working with her campaign. This time it was Bernie Sanders on the wrong end of their sabotage.

A new email obtained by POLITICO is shedding more light on the mystery of whether and how interim DNC chair Donna Brazile might have obtained the text of a proposed question from a town hall between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in advance, and possibly shared it with the Clinton campaign.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-me...rtin-cnn-email-donna-brazile-wikileaks-229673
 
If the government and media want her elected, then just let her have it. Wasting everyone's time with pretending this isn't fixed.
 
from the wikileaks dumps over the past few days, they clearly thought they would lose to just about any other than trump. knowing that they completely rigged the dem primaries, is it crazy to think that they helped rig the gop primaries in favor of trump. during the primaries, the media almost exclusively followed trump, it was like the other candidates didnt even exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poolside Knight
from the wikileaks dumps over the past few days, they clearly thought they would lose to just about any other than trump. knowing that they completely rigged the dem primaries, is it crazy to think that they helped rig the gop primaries in favor of trump. during the primaries, the media almost exclusively followed trump, it was like the other candidates didnt even exist.
Truth be told though, Trump has always made it easy for the media to follow him. He panders to them much more than almost any other candidate in history. He gladly puts himself out there. The media are largely lazy so he does half their job for them.
 
This is lamestream news today? It was in the twittersphere the night of. All you cucks keep staying not woke.

You're just a crazy right wing conspirator though if you state the obvious without proof. Can't imagine all the fun we missed with those 33,000 deleted emails that any of us would be in jail for if we deleted one of them. This is really all Russia's fault though and the GOP colluding with them.
 
It means nothing, the crooks in the media will bury it because they can and Fox is just as guilty.
 
The damning video was literally up the night of.

Be a good goy & follow the alt right's @Cernovich. He's racist Christian like all of the Trump supporting KKK (except he's actually Jewish & married to a non white girl), but FTS all Trump voters are HS dropout redkneck racists!
 
Fox has been going off on it all day, the same for the rest of the conservative media. The problem is the libs control the mainstream media and have the country convinced everyone but them is biased when the truth is that NBC and CBS are equivalent to Breitbart and The Blaze.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
Nation needs more insiders in Washington DC...have to keep the elite in both media and politics in power and in charge.
 
Bad people like Hillary's mam are one of the main reasons that the U.S. is in a standoff with the Russians in Syria, thanks to Brazile's efforts war pimp in Mom jeans Obama became the biggest war monger since Truman.
 
That is so great considering Brazile went on a self righteous defense after the first emails. Now she looks like a lying sack of crap.

Can anyone really claim that there's no collusion between the Democratic Party and the media?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
It serves CNN/DNC right for hiring this clown Brazile in the name of diversity.

The entire Liberal Left-wing establishment is being decapitated in ways unimaginable 4 years ago.
 
It was actually TV One, CNN'a partner.

The reason it's received so much attention is because even anchors at CNN are pissed at their own management and contracts because it undermines their own credibility as journalists.

CNN originally downplayed it until their own anchors were openly questioning their own partners. Journalists do suddenly care when their own reputation is at stake, their management be damned.
 
who would have thought that MSNBC would have more integrity than CNN?

"This is completely unremarkable," a CNN spokeswoman told the Washington Examiner. "We have similar communications with Republicans. When preparing for interviews we are regularly sent suggestions from rival campaigns and political parties, both solicited and unsolicited. Casting a wide net to ensure a tough and fair interview isn't just common media practice, it's smart."

CNN asked the DNC for some questions. They responded. Apparently, they do the same with the RNC. Not sure what the big deal is. It certainly isn't collusive. The Trump/Blitzer interview in question never even aired.
 
"This is completely unremarkable," a CNN spokeswoman told the Washington Examiner. "We have similar communications with Republicans. When preparing for interviews we are regularly sent suggestions from rival campaigns and political parties, both solicited and unsolicited. Casting a wide net to ensure a tough and fair interview isn't just common media practice, it's smart."

CNN asked the DNC for some questions. They responded. Apparently, they do the same with the RNC. Not sure what the big deal is. It certainly isn't collusive. The Trump/Blitzer interview in question never even aired.

Interviews are NOT debates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
Interviews are NOT debates.
Right, but nowhere in the wikileaks email (from the article linked) did it say they were asking for debate questions:


Newly released emails from WikiLeaks suggest that the Democratic National Committee colluded with CNN in devising questions in April to be asked of then-Republican primary candidate Donald Trump in an upcoming interview.
In an email to DNC colleagues on April 25 with the headline "Trump Questions for CNN," a DNC official with the email username DillonL@dnc.org asked for ideas for an interview to be conducted by CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer.

"Wolf Blitzer is interviewing Trump on Tues ahead of his foreign policy address on Wed. ... Please send me thoughts by 10:30 AM tomorrow."

A separate email from Dillon that same day said "CNN is looking for questions" for then-GOP primary candidate Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, and "maybe a couple on" former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina.
 
Its so funny how much benign, typical political stuff is being treated in this election. Especially when you can only see one person on one side. Just hilarious.
 
I'm not going to go hunting for it but Donna Brazil gave Podesta the exact question from the town hall debate. It was about the debate.
Different emails. Different article.

Yes, Donna Brazile was in cahoots with the DNC and the debates. That was wrong. But that was not the subject of the article linked above.
 
But FFS its the same damn thing.
And it really is a "so what?" situation. CNN asks both parties for questions and interviews often feature coaching and prep where the questions to the subjects are known ahead of time. None of that is new or earth-shattering. I'm not really sure why there's outrage over this as it's something that has been done for both sides and for a really long time.

What are you going to get mad about next in the wikileaks emails? That they ordered Domino's for lunch? GOD DAMN DOMINO'S SHOULDN'T SERVE THOSE COMMIE PINKOS!!
 
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

16. Hillary cheated in debates: DNC head Donna Brazile caught
giving MULTIPLE debate questions to Hillary




  • Here is video proof of the question Donna Brazile sent. In the video, you can SEE Hillary looking down at her script to answer the question. Notice how Hillary has an extremely detailed response citing a dozen different things. Yet another scripted Hillary moment as you will see throughout these leaks.

  • The question about the death penalty was asked almost verbatim by CNN the next night. Here is video evidence showing it.

  • These are two clear instances and proof of Donna Brazile giving debate questions to Hillary's team. She tried hard to defend herself the first time in a cringe-worthy interview with FOX's Megyn Kelly. Donna dodged, pivoted, avoided the accusations and claimed she was "being persecuted" for being asked about leaking the question to Hillary so she could cheat.

  • A day before the 2nd leak implicating Donna Brazile, she wrote on Twitter, "Please God, let this end soon"

  • Shortly after this revelation came out, Donna Brazile (awaiting her resignation) wrote this on Twitter: "Thank you @CNN. Honored to be a Democratic Strategist and commentator on the network. Godspeed to all my former colleagues."

  • CNN wrote, "We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor."

  • Remember, Donna Brazile worked for CNN and the first debate question was released through CNN. The network that has been caught colluding with the Hillary campaign and in their own words, "doing everything [they] can to give [Hillary] a free ride" is implicated just as much as Donna Brazile and has no room to take the high road here.

  • Assuming she is fired from the DNC (based on news, it seems likely as she was already fired from CNN), this would be the second head of the DNC to be fired in less than a year due to extremely unethical collusion with Hillary's campaign. The first (Debbie Wasserman-Schultz) was hired by Hillary herself after she was fired by the DNC. Maybe Donna Brazile will follow suit.
 
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

16. Hillary cheated in debates: DNC head Donna Brazile caught
giving MULTIPLE debate questions to Hillary




  • Here is video proof of the question Donna Brazile sent. In the video, you can SEE Hillary looking down at her script to answer the question. Notice how Hillary has an extremely detailed response citing a dozen different things. Yet another scripted Hillary moment as you will see throughout these leaks.

  • The question about the death penalty was asked almost verbatim by CNN the next night. Here is video evidence showing it.

  • These are two clear instances and proof of Donna Brazile giving debate questions to Hillary's team. She tried hard to defend herself the first time in a cringe-worthy interview with FOX's Megyn Kelly. Donna dodged, pivoted, avoided the accusations and claimed she was "being persecuted" for being asked about leaking the question to Hillary so she could cheat.

  • A day before the 2nd leak implicating Donna Brazile, she wrote on Twitter, "Please God, let this end soon"

  • Shortly after this revelation came out, Donna Brazile (awaiting her resignation) wrote this on Twitter: "Thank you @CNN. Honored to be a Democratic Strategist and commentator on the network. Godspeed to all my former colleagues."

  • CNN wrote, "We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor."

  • Remember, Donna Brazile worked for CNN and the first debate question was released through CNN. The network that has been caught colluding with the Hillary campaign and in their own words, "doing everything [they] can to give [Hillary] a free ride" is implicated just as much as Donna Brazile and has no room to take the high road here.

  • Assuming she is fired from the DNC (based on news, it seems likely as she was already fired from CNN), this would be the second head of the DNC to be fired in less than a year due to extremely unethical collusion with Hillary's campaign. The first (Debbie Wasserman-Schultz) was hired by Hillary herself after she was fired by the DNC. Maybe Donna Brazile will follow suit.
Yup. Pretty shitty of Brazile and the DNC to do that. That is definitely unethical.

And not the subject to which I was referring, which was this post by PoolsideKnight: https://ucf.forums.rivals.com/threa...aign-colluded-on-town-hall.45822/#post-933987
 
Its so funny how much benign, typical political stuff is being treated in this election. Especially when you can only see one person on one side. Just hilarious.

Yours beyond hope or redeeming.

You're just another Deplorable
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT