ADVERTISEMENT

DC Intel Leakers and NYT are sabotaging UK intelliegence efforts

As much as I trust your promises, I require a slightly higher burden of proof.

And 85 try not to live up to the frat boy roid rage stereotypes, it's unbecoming.[/

Typical arrogant liberal that tries to tell us how superior he is but we know the truth.
 

1) I've lost count of how many times I've had to tell you I'm not a liberal. You really can't blame me for assuming you've gone senile.

2) your entire argument consists of "I'm pretty sure Obama did the same thing, so it's ok that Trump is doing it too". You sure that's the best you can do?
 
I'm sorry that Constitutional scholar remark was below the belt, I apologise.

But Gal how is someone who constantly criticizes Trump any worse than someone who constantly praises him? Aren't both equally blind to the other side?
 
I'm sorry that Constitutional scholar remark was below the belt, I apologise.

But Gal how is someone who constantly criticizes Trump any worse than someone who constantly praises him? Aren't both equally blind to the other side?
I rarely see anyone praise Trump, what I see is a lot of defending him from the likes of the idiot left.
 
The location of the subs are classified, but let's not assume Trump means they are just sitting off the coast. These subs have a published range of 4000 nm. They could be almost in Hawaii and still be in the Korean peninsula operational range.
 
This is fun. Ninja is exactly like Chemmie. He keeps getting crushed and humiliated but keeps coming back for more. A couple of constructive criticisms for you: Try sprinkling in a more insults into your arguments, they will appear to make more sense. Try posting your 4 step discussion forecast a few times in every thread as it really bolsters your arguments. I know these methods haven't really helped so far but it's probably because you haven't done it enough. Have you tried typing more loudly?
 
This is fun. Ninja is exactly like Chemmie. He keeps getting crushed and humiliated but keeps coming back for more. A couple of constructive criticisms for you: Try sprinkling in a more insults into your arguments, they will appear to make more sense. Try posting your 4 step discussion forecast a few times in every thread as it really bolsters your arguments. I know these methods haven't really helped so far but it's probably because you haven't done it enough. Have you tried typing more loudly?

No offense, but everyone knows how ignorant you are on this particular matter. You have made it known repeatedly.

And it really wasn't nice humiliating 85 by bringing up his handicapped debating skills, we should let bygones be bygones otherwise every thread would just consist of making fun of Bob, 85 and Gal for the stupid stuff they say in other threads. That's why I apologized for my Constitutional Scholar comment already, if I continuously brought up his intellectual short comings every thread this place would just consist of 100 page long repeat threads.

I thought you and 85 were buddies anyway? Why would you bring up something as embarrassing as his 4 step process? Dick move bro.
 
No offense, but everyone knows how ignorant you are on this particular matter. You have made it known repeatedly.

And it really wasn't nice humiliating 85 by bringing up his handicapped debating skills, we should let bygones be bygones otherwise every thread would just consist of making fun of Bob, 85 and Gal for the stupid stuff they say in other threads. That's why I apologized for my Constitutional Scholar comment already, if I continuously brought up his intellectual short comings every thread this place would just consist of 100 page long repeat threads.

I thought you and 85 were buddies anyway? Why would you bring up something as embarrassing as his 4 step process? Dick move bro.

LOL.

And no, I don't know 85.
 
How exactly am I "faux raging" if I said I don't care how classified information gets shared with our enemies, I only care that it stops. If anyone is "faux raging" it's you for completely ignoring an entire facet of this discussion because it doesn't fit the predetermined thought lines laid out for you by your party.

I am actually outraged that our enemies are getting this information, you are faux raging that a press member is leaking it and completely disregard the damage done by our POTUS. There's been talk in the Intel world about limiting the information shown to Trump because of his blatant disregard for it's sanctity. Thats some deep shit. But he's on your "team" so you don't give a shit. You are pathetic.
where have i faux raged about it itt? you clearly have me confused with someone else. for someone that claims to not be faux raging over this issue, its odd that youd post a pic of a guy flipping over a table.

im a libertarian, and im not on trumps team. hes done some good and some bad. however, ive been trying to give him an opportunity to do his job without throwing him under the bus at every chance. that is something your "team" clearly has done. when cnn has 90+ % negative coverage of trump, that should tell you something. they arent being fair or objective. but go ahead and faux rage some more about trump and his 2 scoops of ice cream.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Great2BAKnight2
where have i faux raged about it itt? you clearly have me confused with someone else. for someone that claims to not be faux raging over this issue, its odd that youd post a pic of a guy flipping over a table.

im a libertarian, and im not on trumps team. hes done some good and some bad. however, ive been trying to give him an opportunity to do his job without throwing him under the bus at every chance. that is something your "team" clearly has done. when cnn has 90+ % negative coverage of trump, that should tell you something. they arent being fair or objective. but go ahead and faux rage some more about trump and his 2 scoops of ice cream.

I'll break it down for you since you appear to be having trouble keeping up.

I care about any intelligence leaks, because by definition they have a serious effect on the security of our country. I don't care if it's coming from slimebag journalists or the mouth of the POTUS, they are bad.

You (and most of the people in this thread) only care about the journalists, as if the information they leak is somehow less damaging then the Intel from Trump. It was all classified the same way, for the same reason.

The table flipping thing was not faux-rage, it was actual rage at Bob for posting two contradictory things.
 
I'll break it down for you since you appear to be having trouble keeping up.

I care about any intelligence leaks, because by definition they have a serious effect on the security of our country. I don't care if it's coming from slimebag journalists or the mouth of the POTUS, they are bad.

You (and most of the people in this thread) only care about the journalists, as if the information they leak is somehow less damaging then the Intel from Trump. It was all classified the same way, for the same reason.

The table flipping thing was not faux-rage, it was actual rage at Bob for posting two contradictory things.
That's the disconnect though. Most posters are arguing on the legality of the leaks, not the impact of the information. I agree the impact can be the same, the difference is the journalist doesn't have the clearance to receive such information where the president does. The president also has the wide view of all intelligence and classified reports, while the reporter only has targeted information. There can be strategic reasons for saying, "we have subs in their waters" but a journalist leaking such information does not have the ability to perceive this strategy.
 
That's the disconnect though. Most posters are arguing on the legality of the leaks, not the impact of the information. I agree the impact can be the same, the difference is the journalist doesn't have the clearance to receive such information where the president does. The president also has the wide view of all intelligence and classified reports, while the reporter only has targeted information. There can be strategic reasons for saying, "we have subs in their waters" but a journalist leaking such information does not have the ability to perceive this strategy.
Ninja simply doesnt get the fact that the POTUS has a different understanding of the information than the journalists. Trump sharing info with other nations is not the same. Trump sharing information to other nations is not a leak by definition. His blind hatred for Trump simply doesnt allow him to see that. Its sad really.
 
Ninja simply doesnt get the fact that the POTUS has a different understanding of the information than the journalists. Trump sharing info with other nations is not the same. Trump sharing information to other nations is not a leak by definition. His blind hatred for Trump simply doesnt allow him to see that. Its sad really.
To be fair, if you view Trump's amateur political mistakes as an indicator that he is out of his league it stands to reason that these intelligence disclosures are not part of any strategic plan and is reckless. I've still defended Trump primarily because I think he is rational and his entire presidency to date has been sensationalized. Of course, I'll change my tune if the Russia investigation has a negative outcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
To be fair, if you view Trump's amateur political mistakes as an indicator that he is out of his league it stands to reason that these intelligence disclosures are not part of any strategic plan and is reckless. I've still defended Trump primarily because I think he is rational and his entire presidency to date has been sensationalized. Of course, I'll change my tune if the Russia investigation has a negative outcome.
Part of that is the media's insane negative slant on all things Trump. When Harvard finds that 80% of coverage on Trump in the first 100 days is negative, its going to skew people's perceptions. They even found Fox to be 52% negative. Like you, Im just trying to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves otherwise.

I mean, I simply cannot believe that Trump would get 2 scoops of ice cream while everyone else got 1...
 
Part of that is the media's insane negative slant on all things Trump. When Harvard finds that 80% of coverage on Trump in the first 100 days is negative, its going to skew people's perceptions. They even found Fox to be 52% negative. Like you, Im just trying to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves otherwise.

I mean, I simply cannot believe that Trump would get 2 scoops of ice cream while everyone else got 1...
Agree. It's the reason I have moved from mainstream media to podcasts entirely.

"The World Next Week" for foreign affairs and "Unfilter" for general politics. They're released weekly. Unfilter does have a libertarian/right lean but they do a great job of calling the media out for the logical fallacies that get reported. Dan Carlin's Common Sense is monthly but is a good issue based political show. Dan is definitely an independent that rips both sides and is strongly anti-establishment/political party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ace of Knights
Agree. It's the reason I have moved from mainstream media to podcasts entirely.

"The World Next Week" for foreign affairs and "Unfilter" for general politics. They're released weekly. Unfilter does have a libertarian/right lean but they do a great job of calling the media out for the logical fallacies that get reported. Dan Carlin's Common Sense is monthly but is a good issue based political show. Dan is definitely an independent that rips both sides and is strongly anti-establishment/political party.

I really enjoy Dan Carlin's common sense. Fair and critical of both sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Great2BAKnight2
No offense, but everyone knows how ignorant you are on this particular matter. You have made it known repeatedly.

And it really wasn't nice humiliating 85 by bringing up his handicapped debating skills, we should let bygones be bygones otherwise every thread would just consist of making fun of Bob, 85 and Gal for the stupid stuff they say in other threads. That's why I apologized for my Constitutional Scholar comment already, if I continuously brought up his intellectual short comings every thread this place would just consist of 100 page long repeat threads.

I thought you and 85 were buddies anyway? Why would you bring up something as embarrassing as his 4 step process? Dick move bro.
Ninja, no one on here is buying what you're selling. Calling other people ignorant does not hide the fact that is is you that is the fool.
 
honestly, that might be the plan. a great way to catch these people is to put out a bunch of random fake info. then see which one gets reported and you have your leak.
Then you charge them for treason and kill them!
 
honestly, that might be the plan. a great way to catch these people is to put out a bunch of random fake info. then see which one gets reported and you have your leak.

If UK and USA were smart, UK would send some false reports to certain channels and then USA can figure out which Dept leaked them.

Thought one of the latest reports was there was at least one mole in the White House.

Regardless whether it's about the UK Bombing or any other forgein or domestic secret info, I hope the traders are finally caught, tarred and feathered.
 
If UK and USA were smart, UK would send some false reports to certain channels and then USA can figure out which Dept leaked them.

Thought one of the latest reports was there was at least one mole in the White House.

Regardless whether it's about the UK Bombing or any other forgein or domestic secret info, I hope the traders are finally caught, tarred and feathered.

LMAO. Damn traders. DAMN THEM ALL!!!!!!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT