Freaking baby boomers man.
Born in 1984 is not being a Baby Boomer. You're a totally inept person.
Freaking baby boomers man.
lmao this x1000
Irony doesn't even begin to describe it.
Isn't fighting back against an ongoing investigation the same thing as obstructing it? What am I missing?
It's still obstructionYou're missing the Constitution moron. You investigate a CRIME, not a person. You're a low information voter.
Which is really the endgame. They know that the longer the investigation goes on, the greater likelihood of creating a process crime, or at the very least be able to make claims of obstruction. This isn't about justice, it's about politics.It's still obstruction
It's still obstruction
Obstructing a crime that doesn't exist? You know nothing about the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
There are 2 facts a moron leftist can't understand:
1) A President can ALWAYS fire a failed FBI director for ZERO reason
and
2) You can't obstruct a fake crime that has zero evidence
I still can't believe how many sheep are in America. It's hilarious. It's ok though because the Patriots outnumber the sheep.
i believe there is a function built into the forums that could do this....Stop feeding the 10 year old troll
i believe there is a function built into the forums that could do this....
You can obstruct justice for a crime that doesn't end up existing. It's the investigation that gets obstructed and the investigation exists. You're thinking about what you want to happen and ignoring what's the law is.Obstructing a crime that doesn't exist? You know nothing about the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
There are 2 facts a moron leftist can't understand:
1) A President can ALWAYS fire a failed FBI director for ZERO reason
and
2) You can't obstruct a fake crime that has zero evidence
I still can't believe how many sheep are in America. It's hilarious. It's ok though because the Patriots outnumber the sheep.
You don't know any of that.Which is really the endgame. They know that the longer the investigation goes on, the greater likelihood of creating a process crime, or at the very least be able to make claims of obstruction. This isn't about justice, it's about politics.
You don't know any of that.
3 people have received plea deals. Plea deals aren't given out for free, these people traded something for their deals. Bob Mueller decided that what they were offering was worth knocking months or years off of their sentences. He wouldn't trade that for nothing.
We have 0 leaks or info on what they traded but they did trade something, that's not in dispute.
So before you're so quick to say the goal is obstruction you should acknowledge that there is at least some valuable substantive evidence out there that we have no clue about at all and it likely isn't limited to JUST what these 3 people traded.
If a drug dealer snitches on a competing dealer it is not a valid defense to say "this was a power play by a competitor." Republicans and democrats try to get each other in trouble all the time Trump would chant lock her up.I don't disagree with the fact that there IS something to investigate here, that is pretty obvious. At the same time, you can't deny that this is politically motivated. The calls for impeachment started before he was even inaugurated and before there was any reasonable suspicion of a crime. It all began with rumor and innuendo for the purpose of undermining the man as POTUS and playing a game to win back the power they lost.
Just out of curiosity, outside of the blanket term "Russian collusion", what crime do you think Trump possibly could have committed? Some sort of personal enrichment? Trump is a rogue agent doing the bidding of Russia instead of the American people? Broken campaign finance laws by the Russians?
The biggest worry is blackmail. Trump fits the typical profile of a target perfectly. Zero counter espionage training, huge power, massive ego, cares entirely too much what other people think about him. If the Russians had some compromising material on him that would cause him to bend to their influence in order to avoid releasing it. The funny thing is Trump probably wouldn't be able to do a low level government job for the DoD since he might not be able to pass a simple SF86 background check, yet no such check is required to become POTUS.
I'm not too worried about Trump being blackmailed. He's the kind of guy who would just deny deny deny and then attack and destroy his blackmailer.
That's a good point. There could be 4K 360 deg videos narrated by the ghost of Abraham Lincoln featuring Trump getting pissed on by Russian hookers and Trump would just call it Fake News. And Bob and 85 and the majority of his base would believe him.
Not being one to exaggerate, that entire scenario could happen with the video delivered by Jesus himself and his blind supporters would still believe it to be fake.
Yep. Blows my mind. There isn't a single person in politics for which I could say that is true. Hell there isn't a person in politics that I agree with 100%, yet so many people are willing to defend to the death all the massive **** ups of someone as incredibly flawed as Trump.
It's nothing like Clinton except in your empty hot pocket shaped head. No liberals care that Trump engaged in a sexual act except for the sweet sweet irony of conservatives joining us in the "no big deal" crew now that it's your orange lord and savior.
I personally think the campaign finance or money laundering or blackmail aspect is a bigger deal than Trump and his sexual kinks whether that's porn stars, piss shows, incest infactuation, or S&M spanking with rolled up magazines that he's on the cover of (my favorite.)
Everyone knows he's a sexual deviant but I want to know if his freaky ways are being used to hurt America or if he broke the law to hide his disgusting sexual exploits.
looks like stormy has to pay trumps legal fees for the defamation suit.
LOL!!!
@fried-chicken favorite lawyer and porn star are defeated soundly by Trump in court and now must pay his legal fees for wasting EVERYONES time with this trash.
America wins again
I'm just thankful that we have a president who can deliver respect to the WH again after the last president was such a huge embarassment. I was starting to begin to think the whole world was laughing at us but I was mistaken, that was a laugh of respect.@fried-chicken is embarrassed and Shook as ever
I'm just thankful that we have a president who can deliver respect to the WH again after the last president was such a huge embarassment. I was starting to begin to think the whole world was laughing at us but I was mistaken, that was a laugh of respect.
Well, me being laughed at by red hats is a litttttttle bit different than our adulterer porn star raw dogging president getting laughed at by a room full of world leaders.The only person being laughed at is you
"DID YOU ORDER DIJON MUSTARD ON A BURGER!!!!! ZOMG *triggering convulsions* "Does going on these hysterical rants make you feel better? Is it a method to cope with your TDS?