The first amendment does not protect you from getting fired for publicly saying/doing stupid shit.
Lmao @ bob explaining the 1st amendment. Double lmao to him responding in a serious manner to an obviously sarcastic post. This is priceless.
The first amendment does not protect you from getting fired for publicly saying/doing stupid shit.
Lmao @ bob explaining the 1st amendment. Double lmao to him responding in a serious manner to an obviously sarcastic post. This is priceless.
That's not true with this much rain. Rivers overtopping their banks by 20 feet isn't getting mitigated by ponds.I know it was/is an extreme rain event and the stormwater system was not going to keep up. The problem is that without planning you end up with areas with 10-15 ft of water, because the water doesn't have a way out, while other areas are dry. If you look at the stormwater ponds, they are interconnected because they are designed to store the water for a while and release it over time. The city/town/neighborhood is going to flood but the levels would be lower and the peak wouldn't we as high. All the water that fell on (and around) Houston will try to get out at the same time and the peak is going to be insane. Good planning would spread that water over several days
I know it was/is an extreme rain event and the stormwater system was not going to keep up. The problem is that without planning you end up with areas with 10-15 ft of water, because the water doesn't have a way out, while other areas are dry. If you look at the stormwater ponds, they are interconnected because they are designed to store the water for a while and release it over time. The city/town/neighborhood is going to flood but the levels would be lower and the peak wouldn't we as high. All the water that fell on (and around) Houston will try to get out at the same time and the peak is going to be insane. Good planning would spread that water over several days
How do you propose planning for a 1000 year event? Are there any city planners around that were alive in 1017? Houston doesn't have a history of being flood prone. No amount of retention ponds would have done anything significant. The two major reservoirs in Houston rose 35'. They cover thousands of acres. A couple hundred more five deep acre retention pond wouldn't have done shit here. 52" of rain in four days, that's normally what they get in an entire year.
He's white and voted for Trump . Slam dunkYou're racist for suggesting this
I think it doesn't protect you from somebody punching you for what you said. You just get the chance to get them prosecuted for batteryThe first amendment does not protect you from getting fired for publicly saying/doing stupid shit.
Probably not but it may help reducing the number of days they are under water every year: 4-5 days flooded per yearThat's not true with this much rain. Rivers overtopping their banks by 20 feet isn't getting mitigated by ponds.
JFC, it's called engineering, Boob. We have sophisticated enough technology to simulate what would happen. You don't need to rely on cave drawings from 1017 to extrapolate what would be needed to prepare for current events.How do you propose planning for a 1000 year event? Are there any city planners around that were alive in 1017? Houston doesn't have a history of being flood prone.
JFC, it's called engineering, Boob. We have sophisticated enough technology to simulate what would happen. You don't need to rely on cave drawings from 1017 to extrapolate what would be needed to prepare for current events.
Did you notice that in my post I never advocated for that? My post was designed to answer Bob's question and to clarify Houston's storied history with flooding.You don't design and build shit for something that may happen once every 1000 years. It's cost prohibitive and everything would be inordinately expensive.
Did you notice that in my post I never advocated for that? My post was designed to answer Bob's question and to clarify Houston's storied history with flooding.
JFC, it's called engineering, Boob. We have sophisticated enough technology to simulate what would happen. You don't need to rely on cave drawings from 1017 to extrapolate what would be needed to prepare for current events.
Also, I didn't realize you were such an expert on Houston. Built on bayous, Houston has battled flooding - some of it very extreme - since its founding. I travel to Houston somewhat regularly for work and the slightest bit of rainfall (by Florida standards) creates massive problems. In fact, I flew into Hobby last year after the Memorial Day floods and it was awful. Here's a little light reading to get you acquainted with Houston and its long history of flooding issues:
https://www.hcfcd.org/flooding-floodplains/harris-countys-flooding-history/
https://weather.com/storms/severe/news/houston-flood-history-may2015-allison
The ex-professor in question is a UCF alum
Yes, we do (I do). In Miami we had to install electrical equipment 16 ft above sea levelYou don't design and build shit for something that may happen once every 1000 years. It's cost prohibitive and everything would be inordinately expensive.
If that's the case, it's the exception to the rule and considering Miami is barely 6 feet above sea level, it's probably a good idea. Shithole Miami is very flood prone and probably needs it. That place gets flooded if it gets 2" of water in a short period and they've never been able to figure out and install a decent pumping/drainage system. If Miami got 1/4 of what Texas did, that place would be completely under water.Yes, we do (I do). In Miami we had to install electrical equipment 16 ft above sea level
You can't plan so it doesn't affect you but you can plan so it does f*ing kill you. Sometimes the 100-yr flood elevation is 1 ft above grade and it isn't a big deal. Sometimes it is 6ft or more above grade and you 1) don't live there, or 2) live there and get good insurance including for flood events - with option 2 you should know that any storm means you better get the hell out and come back later.LOL at anyone who says they can plan for freak 100 year storm is full of sh:t.
after the tsunami in japan a few years ago, they found some stones up in the hills that apparently indicated where some had flooded up to a couple hundred years ago. you simply cant engineer your way out of a 100 year event.You can't plan so it doesn't affect you but you can plan so it does f*ing kill you. Sometimes the 100-yr flood elevation is 1 ft above grade and it isn't a big deal. Sometimes it is 6ft or more above grade and you 1) don't live there, or 2) live there and get good insurance including for flood events - with option 2 you should know that any storm means you better get the hell out and come back later.
I can understand the "we never flooded before" crew staying but I don't get the "I just finished rebuilding after the 2015 (or 2016) flood" not evacuating when they said 40+ inches of rain
Sure.And this wasn't even a 100 year event. It was a 500 or 1000 year. It would be way to costly and just plain stupid the plan for a flood that may happen again in 500 or 1000 years. Very few buildings or infrastructure would be around that long.