If Ginsberg were to croak, nothing's gonna happen until next year.
Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, is on record as being adamant that America can't fill a SCOTUS seat during an election year so working with the President to fill her seat in a few months would be sort of hypocritical.
Wrong. The position will be filled in 2 weeks.If Ginsberg were to croak, nothing's gonna happen until next year.
Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, is on record as being adamant that America can't fill a SCOTUS seat during an election year so working with the President to fill her seat in a few months would be sort of hypocritical.
It would be the fastest confirmation ever.Wrong. The position will be filled in 2 weeks.
LMAO -- Yeah, those Dems would throw the rules out the window!!!!The Democrats are already vowing to pack the courts so the rules are out the window.
The Democrats are already vowing to pack the courts so the rules are out the window. Maybe Trump should just pre-empt them doing this and put 20 conservatives on SCOTUS now
Agree. The reaction would change American government as we know it.It would be the fastest confirmation ever.
She's been the prize for 3 years. A lot of conservatives would disregard anything Trump or the Senate did as long as they replaced RBG.Agree. The reaction would change American government as we know it.
John Roberts recently rebuked the concept of liberal judges and conservative judges but I think that we've seen reality being different. At what point do we acknowledge reality and build a court that's balanced rather than this pendulum swing? Is it even possible to do so in a way that stands the test of time?If Trump replaces RBG this year, you can bet that the dems will add 2 Supreme Court justices.
If Trump replaces RBG this year, you can bet that the dems will add 2 Supreme Court justices.
The opinions of each Supreme Court justice are important. I think Roberts and Gorsuch are trying to be non-ideologically. Alito and Thomas will vote the conservative line all day, everyday like its their job. RBG and Breyer vote the liberal line to offset those two. I have hope for Kavanaugh once he gets over being butthurt (but Thomas never seem to). If Biden replaces Thomas or Alito, I could see Roberts becoming more conservative.John Roberts recently rebuked the concept of liberal judges and conservative judges but I think that we've seen reality being different. At what point do we acknowledge reality and build a court that's balanced rather than this pendulum swing? Is it even possible to do so in a way that stands the test of time?
Better yet, just erase all case law and start over with all judgements being made on the basis of constitutional law as we move forward.Honestly, if we did away with the lifetime appointment a lot of things would probably be different and it wouldn’t be a partisan fight to the death it is now. One term something like 10-20 years in length. No extensions, you can retire early if you like.
That would force Congress to do it's job and legislate rather than investigate and haggle over funding.Better yet, just erase all case law and start over with all judgements being made on the basis of constitutional law as we move forward.
Agree. 12 years for each branch. POTUS gets three 4 year terms, House gets six 2 year terms, Senate gets two 6 year terms, SC gets one 12 year term max. Limits career politicians unless they are really good at their job.Honestly, if we did away with the lifetime appointment a lot of things would probably be different and it wouldn’t be a partisan fight to the death it is now. One term something like 10-20 years in length. No extensions, you can retire early if you like.
Maybe we could get a break in the constant campaigning if we gave the President 2 6-year terms instead.Agree. 12 years for each branch. POTUS gets three 4 year terms, House gets six 2 year terms, Senate gets two 6 year terms, SC gets one 12 year term max. Limits career politicians unless they are really good at their job.
Maybe we could get a break in the constant campaigning if we gave the President 2 6-year terms instead.
Meh, I don't like it. If they're bad I want them gone ASAP. If you want to stop the constant campaigning then make congressional terms 4 years instead of 2.Maybe we could get a break in the constant campaigning if we gave the President 2 6-year terms instead.
Her remaining on the Court is proving the point that the Court has become a political body.https://www.npr.org/2020/07/17/8922...ancer-again-says-she-will-remain-on-the-court
RBGs cancer is back. Her days are probably numbered.
You have to have a lot of respect for her drive to keep doing her job, but I feel bad for her being in this position.
I really want to deny that, but she's been dealing with the liver cancer since February. Waiting 5 months to announce it seems like a political play to rile up the liberal base.Her remaining on the Court is proving the point that the Court has become a political body.
Here's another thought: Maybe, just maybe, it means she has a life-time appointment.Her remaining on the Court is proving the point that the Court has become a political body.
Her remaining on the Court is proving the point that the Court has become a political body.
As long as scotus is a single term, I think everybody would be in agreement.Because it's a lifetime appointment. There should be term limits for all 3 branches if they are to be equal.
One term, 12 years. I think states do something similar and it works.As long as scotus is a single term, I think everybody would be in agreement.
Gotta be longer than 12 years, doesnt it? Id think more like 20.One term, 12 years. I think states do something similar and it works.
Gotta be longer than 12 years, doesnt it? Id think more like 20.
It would be interesting to see how that would affect elections, knowing that a certain justice would definitely be replaced by the next president, guaranteed. It might make scotus even more political than it already is, which is kind of scary.