horse dewormer and curing cancer
- Thread starter Boston.Knight
- Start date
It doesn't work for every cancer but it has unique capabilities at softening up cold tumors. It's better being cycled and stacked with other agents also
I've watched more than a handful of legitimate videos of people curing cold tumor cancer cycling fenbendazole and ivermectin. When I say cold I mean terminal dude
Same with nitazoxinide and brain cancer. IVM does not cross the blood brain barrier so you need something else.
It's a lot better are stabbing the dark than getting on some bullshit clinical trial like we did with my father-in-law that eventually ended up killing him.
I've watched more than a handful of legitimate videos of people curing cold tumor cancer cycling fenbendazole and ivermectin. When I say cold I mean terminal dude
Same with nitazoxinide and brain cancer. IVM does not cross the blood brain barrier so you need something else.
It's a lot better are stabbing the dark than getting on some bullshit clinical trial like we did with my father-in-law that eventually ended up killing him.
Nothing 'set back' doctors trying things 'off-label' for terminal patients than being so anti-Trump, they literally instituted a 'no off-label' attitude that would eliminate 20% of all prescriptions.
****tards in charge
****tards in charge
Forget terminal dude, you want to try this stuff while your immune system is still healthy. It can be done in parallel to chemo too from what I understand. Personally, I would try an alt protocol for 4-6 wks first if possible with the dietary/lifestyle changes and get rescan for mets, then do chemo. But they may work well together too depending on how well the cancer generally responds to chemo
Both ivermectin and fenbedazole are fooking harmless it's not gonna hurt anything to try. You can go high dose and not have a worry @Auggie25 feel free to quote this thread should opportunity present in the dungeon. Thank you and have a blessed weekend.
Understood. But it's also hurting existing 'off-label' prescriptions.
That's such a great interview with Dr. Ruddy. More and more credentialed medical professionals are pointing the finger at mRNA.
Some anti-viral and some retro-viral medicines work in various ways. The US FDA admitted, in a court of law, that Ivermectin is a safe and proven anti-viral that works for some diseases.
At least there is some good coming out of this, after literally 'setting us back' for 2+ years because people hate Trump. That Ivermectin is an anti-viral. Whether it works well at FDA approved 'safe' doses for SARS-CoV-2 is still debated, with more studies saying 'no' than 'yes,' but it is now re-proven as an anti-viral, and overdose usage is more mixed.
It's just like retro-virals used against HIV did not work well against SARS-CoV-2 too. There is no general 'magic bullet' for everything. That's why we encourage off-label usage at proven safe doses.
Even high-dose ivermectin is safe. It's very hard to overdose. I think for cancer I would go high dose
But yes I remember all the propaganda coming out of the CDC in the FDA, what a joke 💰
Same cancer as my father-in-law wish I known in 2018. Better than some BS clinical trial on keytruda which had zero chance of ever working and only caused harm
The FDA has taken it all off-line now. They tried to skirt the settlement, but a judge had enough.
It's just so funny, and sad, to read the transcripts where the FDA admitted it is safe and an anti-viral, and it was an one-off statement. That destroyed them, because even the arbitration involved asked the FDA why they made an one-off statement, and even the judge could 'read between the lines' and said the FDA was literally talking about a FDA approved drug, and 20% of all prescriptions of all drugs are off-label, things that were at odds with their own advisements.
Ultimately the FDA was ruled as going outside their role, and... were lucky they weren't found to be guilty of libel, had the parties suing been willing to pursue that. They just wanted to continue to practice.
Correspondingly, all state medical boards have dropped all their actions. The few that already took away licenses are now getting sued. It's not good for the regulators.
That's what happens when the FDA advises with political statements, not medical facts.
