ADVERTISEMENT

Hulu Is Developing a Cable-Style Online TV Service

brahmanknight

Moderator
Moderator
Sep 5, 2007
38,978
12,520
113
Winter Park
Hulu is developing a subscription service that would stream feeds of popular broadcast and cable TV channels, people familiar with the plans said, a move that would make the company a competitor to traditional pay-TV providers and other new digital entrants.

Until now, Hulu has offered on-demand programming from major networks, similar to Netflix Inc. The company hopes to launch the new cable TV-style online service in the first quarter of 2017, the people said. Walt Disney Co. and 21st Century Fox, which are co-owners of Hulu, are near agreements to license many of their channels for the platform.

Disney’s ABC, ESPN and Disney Channel are expected to be available on the service along with the Fox broadcast network, Fox News, FX and Fox’s national and regional sports channels. Preliminary conversations with other programmers have begun, but the service isn’t looking to offer all the hundreds of channels found in the traditional cable bundle, according to the people familiar with the plans.

As consumers continue to seek out broadband-based alternatives to high-priced cable and satellite services, a host of media players are increasingly trying to win over those “cord-cutters.”

Hulu sees an opportunity to pitch its planned service to the more than 10 million people who already subscribe to its on-demand service. Consumers don’t need to be an existing Hulu subscriber to sign up for the new service, which has yet to be named.

Hulu hasn’t set a price for its planned service but Sanford C. Bernstein media analyst Todd Juenger estimated that it would likely cost around $40 a month. An executive close to Hulu said that figure was in the ballpark.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hulu-is-developing-a-cable-style-online-tv-service-1462150982
 
  • Like
Reactions: jetsaholic
:p we still have to keep our cable Internet with BH. Now they charge a ton of money to have just the cable and an additional $20 for the basic cable channels, so it would actually be an extra $20/month for us.
 
Satellite internet will only get better because of this. They have no skin in the cable market to be vindictive with customers dropping it.
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/...-data-caps-but-they-exist-elsewhere/83713186/

But neither Charter, TWC or Bright House impose a data cap today. Charter did earlier have data-use restrictions, but it rarely if ever enforced them before scrubbing them from its fine print in late 2014.

Would the bigger company have changed its mind under pressure from Wall Street or new management? Now we won’t find out, at least not for the next seven years.

This doesn’t help customers of other Internet providers that continue to impose data caps. But the two largest among them, AT&T and Comcast, have recently moved to make their own look less stringent.

Comcast, the nation’s largest Internet provider, announced Wednesday that it would raise the 300 GB cap it has tested in some markets to 1 TB starting June. Buying out of that will then cost another $50 a month; otherwise, you’ll pay $10 extra for an additional 50 GB.

Comcast isn’t saying when these trials, which began some four years ago, might conclude and lead to the possible expansion of the caps to such markets as Washington, where a Comcast-using FCC commissioner today faces no such limit.

Even 150 GB can seem like an insane amount of data, and many users don’t approach that level. But online backup and online video -- for example, Netflix uses about 3 GB per hour for high-definition video, 7 GB for “4K” Ultra HD -- can add up quickly.

And when you have multiple computers and other connected devices in a home, figuring out what’s pushing you close to a cap can become a guessing game. Neither AT&T nor Comcast provide a tool to break down your data usage on an app- or site-specific basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jetsaholic
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT