LEFTIST PEDO & GENERAL IDIOCY MEGATHREAD
- Thread starter _glaciers
- Start date
not only embarrassing, its sad. someone with this level of competency needs to be spending time with family, not dealing with trying to run the greatest, most powerful nation civilization will ever see.
Just remember, You can feel very secure in what is on Twitter now that all of the purveyors of disinformation have been banished to that evil Parler. It's even got a blue check mark so you know that it's the way you should be thinking.
Dude, I love how people think federal employees are all military, let alone are (actually state employee) teachers, police officers, etc... Gets old.
But ... yeah ... this one is ... just ... yeah. Capital city takes care of its own.
Only politicians and the rich deserve more police.
Just remember ... the Democrats will take down all businesses ... as long as they are domestic, lack lawyers and lack lobbyists, such as small businesses. Sigh ... this is getting too predictable.
Northern Virginia is turning into the big business, lobbying clearing house, and it's not the Republican party. The idea that defense contractors love Republicans only is getting old.
About the only Domestic show I'll watch, an anti-Liberal Establishment in Krystal, and an anti-Republican Establishment in Saager. And Krystal is a Democrat from Northern Virginia ... she understands.
I don't agree with both of them often, but they do expose all the non-sense of both parties.
Krystal Ball Is the Anti–Rachel Maddow Bernie Fans Have Been Waiting For
Krystal Ball was once an MSNBC star. Now she’s one of the few mainstream media figures who gets why Bernie Sanders matters and why liberal professionals shouldn’t be allowed to dominate progressive politics.
www.jacobinmag.com
Last edited:
Even most conservatives would rather have a better alternative than Trump to get behind. The problem is that Trump is the only person that is willing to go to fight against the Democrats in the same way they've fought against Republicans for decades. Finally seeing someone that is willing to actually stand up to the political bullies for causes that you agree with and not bend over instantly makes you very willing to overlook a bunch of mean tweets.
Let's find someone with a spine and the desire to fight for conservative and libertarian values (not just the fringe whackos who can hold views because they'll never actually have to defend them) and can do so without the Twitter horribleness. Surely there has to be someone in this country of 360 million people.
Besides 'mean tweets,' let's not forget: Paying off a pornstar to keep her mouth shut ...and blatant examples of racism ....and obsessive lying ...and two impeachments ...and mishandling the pandemic. Just THOSE sorts of things, right sk8? We want somebody whose willing to 'stand up' to the political bullies for the causes we agree with -- even if that means 'bending over' for Russia's murderous dictator, Vladimir Putin, right sk8?
The reality is that by sticking with a dangerous idiot like Trump, the causes you agree with aren't going have a champion in Washington for the next decade or so.
Of course you didn't.
Opinion | Donald Trump’s Racism: The Definitive List, Updated (Published 2018)
The media uses euphemisms. Here’s the truth: President Trump is a racist.
Yep, including the staple of his voter base.
Fight, yes.
But to accomplish what? That's my problem with Trump.
Unfortunately ... I don't think the establishment will allow such. Ergo ...
Please show me anyone who has been in the US Congress for any time, or any lobbyist of any term, who doesn't have blackmail, fiscal incentives, etc... In fact, because so many are so 'in bed' with foreign governments, especially Russia 2008-2014 (Romney tried to warn us -- both parties were involved) ...
I really don't think anyone of any time in the US Congress is free from either blackmail or fiscal incentives. Especially since insider information and making money from legislation is not outlawed on the Congressional floor.
Small businesses are being destroyed, and more and more Americans -- as well as non-immigrants, and we don't have immigration any more, not even 'indentured servitude' -- are seeing no hope in sight. In fact, a lot of even Jan 6th protestors, trespassers, attackers (whatever people want to label them), especially those not armed, were small business owners and people in massive amounts of debt (like most small business owners suddenly cut off from any and all revenue).
The US Congress has become the UK Parliament of 250 years ago. It doesn't end well.
Of course, I work in one of the major, big business industries ... so I'm a loyalist. But I see what's happening. I'm too old to care. And I'm glad I didn't have children. As I said, I'm not joking when I said I'm giving up my American Libertarianism. It's over. And so few care.
Hey, Shuck, those impeachments were total bull crap. handling the pandemic? How would you have done it better? Would you Coumo it? I have a general distrust in government. I don't think any Democrat would have done better some maybe even worse.
I had a lot of skepticism of Trump. But Sk8 is right. Far too long have Republicans come home and pandered to the people only to go to DC and suck up ,not fight for them ,not represent them and do the opposite of what they say they would do. The fact is both globalist Democrats and Republicans and their feckless governance gave us the likes of Trump. He is a symptom of the problem and the problem is at our core we are a center right country and the middle class is being ignored . I want somebody to stand up for the rule of law, the Constitution,the individual not a group, and for somebody to say NO..
We are not a racist nation. Conservatives are not bad people. We don't hate science ,or gay people, or brown people. Most people conservative or Democrat are kind . Most people just want to raise their families, do their jobs and be left alone.
Trump stood up, said no. Biden et al , George Bush and many others just have sold us out to global corporate interests, to the Chinese so we could get their money to buy off votes and power in DC. Trump's personality sucks but he did what many in the middle want, he stood and faught for American ideals and principles. The left hate him because he was and still is a legitimate threat to their globalist agenda , their power and their foreign money pipeline .
If you want to ignore a f*king insurrection as 'bull crap,' I guess that's your right in a free country -- at least one that's still free for now.
That's not conservative (or liberals) going to Washington and selling out. That's the power of money making sure the status quo is maintained.
I totally agree with that. This has always described a clear majority of this country. The only difference today is that the radicals on both ends have gotten much louder thanks to social media and cable TV.
Except it wasn’t an insurrection. Walking around the Capitol building and taking selfies before leaving that same day was not an attempt to overthrow the government. That rhetoric is dangerously irresponsible and was uttered to keep people like you so emotional that you won’t think rationally. The rhetoric is being spewed by the same people that called the armed occupation of multiple blocks of Seattle for weeks and renounced US sovereignty while doing so a “protest.” It’s not genuine; it’s directed to manipulate people.
What happened in Seattle was, by definition, an insurrection.
Now we have HR 1 about to be voted on in the House. HR 1 is a bill designed to standardize voting around a set of federal requirements. Among them is auto-voter enrollment whenever someone goes to the DMV, or Medicaid, or other social services. It makes state voter ID laws illegal; voters need to sign that they are a legal voter with no requirement to verify. It forces states to send out mail-in ballots to everyone automatically and forces them to count them even if they are 10 days late. Finally, it legalizes ballot harvesting.
This is a bill making the largest vulnerabilities in the system legal. It is a bill that creates requirements that make it impossible to investigate any exploitation of these vulnerabilities prior to the legislative deadlines mandated for election certification. This is spit in the eye of everyone that had any legitimate questions about possible exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Instead of securing the elections and regaining the trust of the people in the system, they are attempting to codify the insecurities. Then they'll tell us it's all legal and anyone complaining is crazy.
This is a bill making the largest vulnerabilities in the system legal. It is a bill that creates requirements that make it impossible to investigate any exploitation of these vulnerabilities prior to the legislative deadlines mandated for election certification. This is spit in the eye of everyone that had any legitimate questions about possible exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Instead of securing the elections and regaining the trust of the people in the system, they are attempting to codify the insecurities. Then they'll tell us it's all legal and anyone complaining is crazy.
It's weird that just a few weeks ago we were being told that we just had the most secure election in history, everything was legit, no fraud or irregularities.........and now they need to overhaul the entire election process.
This is blatantly unconstitutional so no matter what it isn't going to fly, but its interesting that they are trying it.
Jesus, you Trump cultists just won't quit.
The insurrection was most assuredly an attempt to thwart the Will of the People. The mob's goal was to stop Congress from blessing the EC vote -- and guess what? THEY DID IT!!!
The police had to clear the building and Congress had to reconvene later the same day in order to carry out their Constitutional duties.
But you'd have us all believe that this was just a bunch of Trumpets "walking around and taking selfies??!?" 🙄
Oh, and I forgot the most unconstitutional part. Pelosi asserts in HR 1 that Congress controls DC’s statehood. The fact is the Constitution requires a Constitutional amendment to grant DC statehood. Didn’t stop her from trying.
This is a win-win-win for her. If it passes the Senate she wins because we’ll never see another Republican majority or President for that matter. If it fails in the Senate, then she can blame obstructionist Republicans for trying to disenfranchise some mythical voting block that somehow can’t obtain and show an ID or can’t vote without some Democrat collecting their vote and mailing it in for them. If it passes both houses but is ruled unconstitutional by SCOTUS, she can pound the drum about what a danger a conservative SCOTUS is to society.
LOL The 'vulnerabilities' that scare the shit out of you is that we make it easier for people to vote in this country.
Simply put, the more people who vote, the less likely your view of the world is going to prevail.
Yeah, it would be SO UNAMERICAN to grant people living in DC the same rights that everybody else in this country has, right?
Let me guess: B-B-But DC is SO SMALL, right? Then maybe we should take away Statehood from Vermont and Wyoming because they are smaller.
Don't you think there is a reason that the founders explicitly stated that DC is not to become a state?
I love how the Trump defense is always he did such a inept job of violating our Constitution, it shouldn't count.
Wikipedia
In 1860, directly before the Civil War, the District had about 75,000 residents, far smaller than such major historical port cities as New York at 800,000 or Philadelphia at more than 500,000.
Demographics of Washington, D.C. - Wikipedia
Well fortunately we don't have a lot of people in Nebraska that like to riot, so it's pretty easy to ignore the thought.
Really? Who's the one spewing 'nonsense' here?
What population did you expect? There's a Grand Canyon-wide difference between a small city supporting our national government and numbers that are higher than the states of Vermont and Wyoming.
You literally said “nobody but congress lived there until after the civil war.”
But the truth is it was always meant to be a city, and one that was distinctly and intentionally not part of a state.
They didn’t decide to keep it from statehood until it got big enough. They specifically said it should be a district under the jurisdiction of congress in Article 1 Section 8 of the constitution.
If you want to shrink the size of the capital “federal district” to just the federal government buildings, that’s fine. But they should then have to give the land back to Maryland and Virginia since they gave up the land in the first place to create DC.
Creating a brand new state out of a tiny patch of land given up by 2 states 200+ years ago to be part of a federal district to serve as the seat of the federal government? Sounds an awful lot like the most extreme form of gerrymandering possible. Just creating completely new states for no reason other than to expand Democratic power in the Senate? Is this something you would support if Republics wanted to split southern states into multiple solidly red states?
Would you please stop taking every point you're trying to make to the most extreme rhetorical place. No one is in that place but you and it makes any real conversation with you difficult.
There is no reason that it can't be easy to vote for every legal voter while making it hard to illegally vote. Make it easy for Joe to turn in his vote while maintaining chain of custody while making it very hard for Jill to round up her entire neighborhood's ballots and turn them in with no way to determine if Jill turned in the original vote or if she amended the vote.
If you really believe the rhetoric that trust in our election system is paramount to the success of our free country, then you'll need to do something about the security of our elections. Legislatively making them less secure is not going to build trust in any rational person.
Last edited:
Why do you think those 'nefarious' activities take place? If Republican legislators weren't making it difficult for non-mobile Americans to turn in their ballots by making polling places few and far between, that kind of 'rounding up' thing wouldn't be necessary.
You and I both know that this is a back-and-forth game designed to either restrict or provide access for as many voters as possible.
