ADVERTISEMENT

Most voters don’t see Trump and Biden as mentally fit to be president, new poll shows

you might not like Trump, but he isn't a babbling buffoon like Biden. He can't complete full thoughts unscripted and he is getting softball questions by the media. I'm sure China is dying for Biden. They would eat him alive.

Yes he is, nuthugger. Dude babbles like a drunk man.
 
Reagan was having intelligence briefings with plants in the White House his second term.*
And his mental acuity in 1987 was probably comparable to where Biden is today. Reagan couldn't have made it another 4 years just like Biden probably can't as well.
 
The difference between Trump and Reagan is that Ronnie was a good man at heart. The American Public knew his mental capacities were in decline but they knew he wasn't going to do anything batshit crazy.

In contrast, Americans (except for his nuthuggers) are literally scared to death that Trump is going to do something really crazy before or after the election.

If we can get to Biden's inauguration in January 2021 without incident, I will be tremendously relieved (but nonetheless, shocked.)
 
The difference between Trump and Reagan is that Ronnie was a good man at heart. The American Public knew his mental capacities were in decline but they knew he wasn't going to do anything batshit crazy.

In contrast, Americans (except for his nuthuggers) are literally scared to death that Trump is going to do something really crazy before or after the election.

If we can get to Biden's inauguration in January 2021 without incident, I will be tremendously relieved (but nonetheless, shocked.)
Our national security is at risk with this man in the Oval Office.
 
I wonder how much of Biden’s gaffs can be attributed to his stuttering which he has successfully worked on over his lifetime?

I just find it funny how nuthuggers like Knighttime go on and on and on about Joe's gaffes (and there are MANY of them) but break their necks with mental gymnastics when Donald bigly sodomizes the English language.
 
Doesn't seem like it other than how liberals like leaking sensitive intel to the world since he's the president.
Did you know that Trump also bragged to Woodward that we have new nuclear capabilities? That means that now China and Russia will start building more nukes. You guys are enabling Trump to destabilize the world.
 
I wonder how much of Biden’s gaffs can be attributed to his stuttering which he has successfully worked on over his lifetime?
You serious bro? Biden isn't stuttering, he's losing his ability to make cogent statements. We aren't talking about a 45 year old, we are talking about a guy that has outlived the average life expectancy and shows all kinds of signs of dementia. Saying this is just "stuttering" is an offense to anyone that has ever dealt with a family member that has dementia.

When my grandma started showing signs, we sure as hell didn't put her in a stressful position like PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, we shut off the gas to her oven.
 
Definitely more than a stuttering issue. He can't keep a coherent thought. He is totally lost if he has to give numbers and stats.
Guess Joe will be exposed at the debates. Grab your popcorn and wait for "The Master of Words," Donald Trump to wipe the ring with the bum.
 
You serious bro? Biden isn't stuttering, he's losing his ability to make cogent statements. We aren't talking about a 45 year old, we are talking about a guy that has outlived the average life expectancy and shows all kinds of signs of dementia. Saying this is just "stuttering" is an offense to anyone that has ever dealt with a family member that has dementia.

When my grandma started showing signs, we sure as hell didn't put her in a stressful position like PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, we shut off the gas to her oven.
I’m just asking the question? Often people make fun of stutter’s who appear to struggle but it’s not an intellectual issue at all. And how do you know it’s not the case here?
 
@firm_bizzle - Utterly agree

In any case, the woman and former VP candidate I was hoping would take the Libertarian primary has taken it, so she's had my vote since before the year began, and it just became official a couple months ago.

I refuse to vote for anyone I don't 85% agree with, and maybe ... at lowest ... 75% if they really have proven, Executive leadership (e.g., Gary Johnson before that).
 
In any case, the woman and former VP candidate I was hoping would take the Libertarian primary has taken it, so she's had my vote since before the year began, and it just became official a couple months ago.
Good for you. Maybe with your help, she'll equal the 4 million votes Johnson got in 2016.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: firm_bizzle
Good for you. Maybe with your help, she'll equal the 4 million votes Johnson got in 2016.
And they won't break 5%, so they have access to EEC money, until they put 3rd parties before question #7 in the polls either.

Until the Rico non-sense ends, ones that allow them to keep polls that put 3rd parties in after most people hangup, and see media outlets like CNN to drop entire ages or demographics when they favor 3rd parry candidates, nothing will change.

I mean, even when the courts rule against the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), like it did in 2017, the government will just ignore the courts, and re-instate the control of organizations like the CPD, like the EEC did in 2019. The CPD has been repeatedly ruled to be a bi-partisan organization, and not non-partisan by the courts, and cannot be considered a non-profit organization, and must register as a PAC, even pay taxes.

And why does this happen? Because if a 3rd party candidate is in the debates, they get 3x as many votes as what they were polling at prior. If a 3rd party candidate doesn't make it into the debates, they get 1/3rd. That's why Perot went from just over 7% to 20%. And Johnson went from nearly 12% to under 4%.

In fact, the 15% rule are double Perot's polling numbers. That was by design. The courts have repeatedly cited this against the CPD, especially since they don't deny they took Perot's debate-time polling numbers and doubled it, and the EEC always ignores the court's orders.

That's why we don't have choice. People should stay on the phone and tell the pollsters they want a 3rd party in the debates. They don't have to vote 3rd party, just answer that way in the polls so they are in the debates. Of course, even when they do break 15%, like Gary Johnson did in 2016 ... CNN can just leave out everyone age 18-29, like they did when Johnson broke 30% in that age group, and 15% overall, so he dropped to 12% overall.

Just like CNN changed '3rd party' (live question) to 'undecided' (on screen) during the Town Hall too.

Heck, CNN left Gary Johnson out of the 2nd GOP primary debate in 2012, even though he was in the top 5, and higher than 3 other candidates who were invited. Why? While the GOP couldn't change the rules, they could ask CNN to leave him out. They didn't want him in the New Mexico primary in 1998 either, but back then the GOP didn't have CNN to tell to leave him out of the GOP debates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
119610336_1282423152091639_1087363405388206453_o.jpg
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Ucfmikes
The difference between Trump and Reagan is that Ronnie was a good man at heart. The American Public knew his mental capacities were in decline but they knew he wasn't going to do anything batshit crazy.

In contrast, Americans (except for his nuthuggers) are literally scared to death that Trump is going to do something really crazy before or after the election.

If we can get to Biden's inauguration in January 2021 without incident, I will be tremendously relieved (but nonetheless, shocked.)
imagine being this outta touch lmao

this is what happens when you sit at home reading NYT/NPR all day
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ucfmikes
Wow.

I actually have to apologise to dog shit, clearly saying these posters are dumber than dog shit is an insult to dog shit.

They are way dumber.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Ucfmikes
Why don't you use the Google machine. Or try the search function in the Water Cooler so you can get the joke.
Why don't you just explain it to me, directly, instead of playing games. You're a proven left wing nut here, just like others are right wing nuts, and in denial as much as they are, and play games with logical Libertarians like myself.

So stop playing games and state exactly what you mean, so I can address it. Otherwise, my point stands. You're a left wing nut just as guilty as the worst of the MAGA wearers, until you stop playing games.
 
Why don't you just explain it to me, directly, instead of playing games. You're a proven left wing nut here, just like others are right wing nuts, and in denial as much as they are, and play games with logical Libertarians like myself.

So stop playing games and state exactly what you mean, so I can address it. Otherwise, my point stands. You're a left wing nut just as guilty as the worst of the MAGA wearers, until you stop playing games.

LMAO @ me being a left wing nut.
LMAO @ you being a logical libertarian
LMAO @ the fact that you can't do a simple effing search.


Just walk away because you look like a got damn fool. Again.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT