Never again

[brahmanknight]

Never again is a phrase used during the post WWII era by politicians world wide to promise that another genocide would not be tolerated. It sounded great theory, yet it has rarely been curbed.

Genocides in Iraq, Rawanda, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Sudan, to name a few, continued with little foreign intervention. The only major action from external forces came during the Yugoslavian situation in the 90's.

Even if the United States, for example, decided using troops was too expensive, very few because it didn't challenge American interest, few sanctions were even used.

Why have nations shyed from stopping genocide? Should, specifically the United States, intervene?

 

[Game_Day_Sports]

Because it hasn't happened in Europe. The UN really only seems to care about European issues and issues in oil producing countries. But even in the oil areas, they only care about putting in leadership that will keep the pumps flowing at a favorable price.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

Barack Obama supports genocide.

 

[EweSeaEff]

Genocides in Iraq, Rawanda, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Sudan, to name a few, continued with little foreign intervention. The only major action from external forces came during the Yugoslavian situation in the 90's.

Because of fear that the cold war would re-emerge? None of those other countries were/are viewed as posing a realistic threat to the G7.

 

[1ofTheseKnights]

Only matters when Zionist invested industries are impacted. Other than that sell to both sides watch them kill each other profit from every possible angle before after & during conflicts. continue to instigate conflicts. 100s of years of success.

 

[UCFKnight85]

There is a Christian genocide occurring right now throughout Iraq and Syria at the hands of ISIS. Our response is to run a few sorties and drop a few bombs to assure everyone that we're "doing something".

 

[UCFWayne]

meh

 

[CommuterBob]

Never again is a phrase used during the post WWII era by politicians world wide to promise that another genocide would not be tolerated. It sounded great theory, yet it has rarely been curbed.

Genocides in Iraq, Rawanda, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Sudan, to name a few, continued with little foreign intervention. The only major action from external forces came during the Yugoslavian situation in the 90's.

Even if the United States, for example, decided using troops was too expensive, very few because it didn't challenge American interest, few sanctions were even used.

Why have nations shyed from stopping genocide? Should, specifically the United States, intervene?

because they're not white.

 

[jetsaholic]

 

[mach3ucf]