How well did it work for us in Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam?Probably the strongest argument for the 2nd amendment. The fact he is bringing up we have more weapons is the exact reason for every American to have guns.
Hilter doesn't gain control over multiple countries without gun control in those countries.
The 2nd amendment is the only thing standing in the way of the right actively using the power of government to advance our goals. Confiscate the guns and we can craft society into the model that it should be.Probably the strongest argument for the 2nd amendment. The fact he is bringing up we have more weapons is the exact reason for every American to have guns.
Hilter doesn't gain control over multiple countries without gun control in those countries.
That was clearly an insurrection. Just like the protestors storming Cavanaugh hearing or when the Senate was bombed in the 80s,but January 6 will be a day that will live in infamy.Guns won't be enough to disrupt government, but 250 unarmed citizens on Jan 6 is another story.
We're in the middle of the most effective propaganda era since Wilson was President; more effective actually. The "Blue Switch" myth that they're peddling is actually laughable but it very well may work and people will believe that it's actually Republicans that are trying to defund police.That was clearly an insurrection. Just like the protestors storming Cavanaugh hearing or when the Senate was bombed in the 80s,but January 6 will be a day that will live in infamy.
Anyone breaking laws and taking stuff should be arrested . That's not peaceful protesting.
Biden is right ,I think he was alluding to the colluding of the media, big tech and the Democrat party . That trifecta would make Joseph Goebbels proud in the amount of propaganda they turn out daily .
I don't want to overthrow the government. I just want government to do its job and ensure liberty for all and frankly just leave me alone. You know, the thing where it says all men and stuff are created equal in the thing...come on man , poor kids are just as bright as white kids.
Remind me. How many Republicans voted on the funding bill that just gave $300+ million to police departments?We're in the middle of the most effective propaganda era since Wilson was President; more effective actually. The "Blue Switch" myth that they're peddling is actually laughable but it very well may work and people will believe that it's actually Republicans that are trying to defund police.
One bill not voted on because of totally different issues is a drop in the bucket when major Democrat-run cities are cutting far more than that yearly. You’re buying a myth. Oh and to make matters worse, the bill the Republicans voted against was new funding; the Dems are cutting existing funding and reducing size, training, benefits, etc.Remind me. How many Republicans voted on the funding bill that just gave $300+ million to police departments?
How many cities are cutting funding? The top two finishers in the NYC mayoral race did not run on the defund platform. Stop creating fake boogeymen.One bill not voted on because of totally different issues is a drop in the bucket when major Democrat-run cities are cutting far more than that yearly. You’re buying a myth. Oh and to make matters worse, the bill the Republicans voted against was new funding; the Dems are cutting existing funding and reducing size, training, benefits, etc.
A couple of politicians did not run on defund in NYC and you think that's evidence that it's not happening?How many cities are cutting funding? The top two finishers in the NYC mayoral race did not run on the defund platform. Stop creating fake boogeymen.
Which of those cities actually cut funding? How many of those that cut funding are putting the cut funds in alternative policing methods?A couple of politicians did not run on defund in NYC and you think that's evidence that it's not happening?
According to Forbes, by August 2020 at least 13 cities had defunded or were in the process of defunding police, including:
New York City, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Seattle, Salt Lake City, Portland, Oregon, Hartford, Connecticut, Norman Oklahoma, and Austin, Texas
Police funding cuts ranged from $1 billion in New York City to $3.5 million in Seattle and $850,000 in smaller cities.
Dig a little deeper and come with something more than the Administration’s spin person to try to gaslight everyone into rewriting history.
The President’s administration correctly telling Americans the fact that the President and Democrats gave cops more money is chilling, but the Capitol insurrection folks are very fine people. OK, pal.Dig a little deeper and come with something more than the Administration’s spin person to try to gaslight everyone into rewriting history.
When you arrive at the NAPO’s report, realize that it considered a bunch of things that had nothing to do with law enforcement, like the social security fairness act, the SALT deductibility act and so on.
Then again, that anyone would actually buy this ridiculousness to the point that they’d propagate it is chilling. When Democrats can rewrite history in real-time and in broad daylight with the help of a very compliant media, this country is doomed.
Oooooh, so a pro-police scorecard from the National Association of Police Officers is bogus?When you arrive at the NAPO’s report, realize that it considered a bunch of things that had nothing to do with law enforcement..
Chilling is a good word for it.Dig a little deeper and come with something more than the Administration’s spin person to try to gaslight everyone into rewriting history.
When you arrive at the NAPO’s report, realize that it considered a bunch of things that had nothing to do with law enforcement, like the social security fairness act, the SALT deductibility act and so on.
Then again, that anyone would actually buy this ridiculousness to the point that they’d propagate it is chilling. When Democrats can rewrite history in real-time and in broad daylight with the help of a very compliant media, this country is doomed.
Chilling is a good word for it.
3 months ago, Pressley, Tlaib, and Omar all publicly called for the abolishing of our police. You think that those rankings aren't someone trying to gaslight you?
- Trump's AG Barr says he's read the Mueller Report and saw 'no harm, no foul.' Crazy's take? 👍
- Trump says we need The Wall so badly, he'll take money from the military to fund it. Crazy's take? 👍
- Trump tells us he's got the virus 'under control' and it will disappear 'once it warms up.' Crazy's take? 👍
- Trump tells us that his reported quid-pro-quo call with the Ukraine President was 'perfect.' Crazy's take? 👍
- Trump tells us that the election was stolen from him and he actually won in a landslide. Crazy's take? 👍
- Trump says that he had nothing to do with the Capitol Riots that took place on Jan. 6th. Crazy's take? 👍
- Biden points to the National Association of Police Officers' own Pro-Police scorecard rankings. Crazy's take? 😲 CHILLING!!!
Who's gaslighting who?3 months ago, Pressley, Tlaib, and Omar all publicly called for the abolishing of our police. You think that those rankings aren't someone trying to gaslight you?
Right. A union paying its dues to the Democrat’s cause. I find it funny that you still tried to use it after I told why it was hogwash.Who's gaslighting who?
The rankings came from the National Association of Police Officers, not the Biden Administration.
The fact you had to spin the rankings speaks volumes.Right. A union paying its dues to the Democrat’s cause. I find it funny that you still tried to use it after I told why it was hogwash.
If you’re going to accuse me of spinning , the please tell me what the components of the rankings that I mentioned had to do with police support.The fact you had to spin the rankings speaks volumes.
Simply put:If you’re going to accuse me of spinning , the please tell me what the components of the rankings that I mentioned had to do with police support.
Sure does. Why do the police give high ratings to people that have publicly stated they want to abolish them? Even Nancy Pelosi took exception to these highly rated congresswomen for their position.Simply put:
- The rankings come from the National Association of Police Officers (NAPO)
- The NAPO is a coalition of police unions and associations from across the United States and was organized for the purpose of advancing the interests of America’s law enforcement officers through legislative advocacy, political action and education.
Since you're not spinning, maybe you can explain why in the world the NAPO would include components that do not support police. Seems odd, don't you think?
Hmmm...maybe, just maybe the NAPO ratings are based on actual voting versus BS red-wing hyperbole.Sure does. Why do the police give high ratings to people that have publicly stated they want to abolish them?
Hmmm...maybe, just maybe the NAPO ratings are based on actual voting versus BS red-wing hyperbole.
A Twitter rant draws the ire of a Trump supporter?Derp.
You didn’t answer the question.Simply put:
- The rankings come from the National Association of Police Officers (NAPO)
- The NAPO is a coalition of police unions and associations from across the United States and was organized for the purpose of advancing the interests of America’s law enforcement officers through legislative advocacy, political action and education.
Since you're not spinning, maybe you can explain why in the world the NAPO would include components that do not support police. Seems odd, don't you think?
Ha, nice dodge. Yeah, I have to explain to YOU what constitutes a 'supportive' police vote as far as the National Association of Police Officers is concerned.You didn’t answer the question.
PERFECT comeback when you can't explain away Rashida Tlaib's pro-police rating from the NAPO.Doesn't matter what the topic is, shuckster makes it about Trump.
In my experience, Democrats like to tout how much smarter and more well educated they are than the rest of us. Truly elite in every intellectual measure.PERFECT comeback when you can't explain away Rashida Tlaib's pro-police rating from the NAPO.
Shuckster is pretty well educated. It's ironic that he doesn't realize that it makes him one of the biggest racists on this boardIn my experience, Democrats like to tout how much smarter and more well educated they are than the rest of us. Truly elite in every intellectual measure.
I guess Shuckster should really be a Republican.
> "simply put"Simply put:
- The rankings come from the National Association of Police Officers (NAPO)
- The NAPO is a coalition of police unions and associations from across the United States and was organized for the purpose of advancing the interests of America’s law enforcement officers through legislative advocacy, political action and education.
Since you're not spinning, maybe you can explain why in the world the NAPO would include components that do not support police. Seems odd, don't you think?
I'm totally cool with taking the presley/Tlaib/Omar approach to policing. I'll bet you can't say the same thing.It never fails. When the posters I'm debating cannot come up with a response -- in this case, being unable to explain away why their 'anti-cops villains' have a pro-police voting ratings with the NAPO -- they resort to what we see here.
I guess juvenile name calling is preferable to saying, "Well I'll be damned, Shuck, I guess you were right on this one."
I guess juvenile name calling is preferable ...
chuds gotta chud
Now THAT I will wholeheartedly agree with.
Maskless Chuds are gonna Chud.
LMFAO. This chud is evidently too stupid
Chud nonsense. You have no answer.
What a Chud response.
I’m not defending any anti-police rhetoric. I’m just pointing out that Twitter rants aren’t the same as one’s voting record.I'm totally cool with taking the presley/Tlaib/Omar approach to policing. I'll bet you can't say the same thing.