Nm
- Thread starter KNIGHTTIME^
- Start date
I was leaving this alone because so much has been claimed and none of it proven, but when the SOS puts a tweet out like this it appears something did happen.
That's an error rate of 0.1% at Trump's expense. That's not uncommon in any voting district. Sad, but true. I don't see the need for anyone to resign.
Just like with the 2000 election, the margin of error was greater than the margin of victory in Florida, as one Supreme Court Justice put it best, statistically.
Now get closer to 1%, documented, and I'm interested, because it likely means it was closer to 5%, in reality. That's New Jersey, year-in, year out.
Just like with the 2000 election, the margin of error was greater than the margin of victory in Florida, as one Supreme Court Justice put it best, statistically.
Now get closer to 1%, documented, and I'm interested, because it likely means it was closer to 5%, in reality. That's New Jersey, year-in, year out.
The numbers in the AJC piece do not match the numbers that VoterGA is claiming. I also don't see a lot of quoting of VoterGA people, just a lot of quotes from people that performed a previous service to the County. So I don't know how accurate this AJC attempt to discount the VoterGA findings will end up being.
those slow counts were bc of VBM counting rules in their States . again all this gaslighting will get someone else hurt but they will continue to drag this out ending with the same result.
Indeed! That's what's getting old. I've had my vote stolen from me too.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
OT: War in Israel 🇮🇱, Iran launches attack on Israel- Latest: KnightDiver21