If the control group shows that delta is 1/3rd as deadly as alpha, shouldn't the death rate for the entire population be even lower than that with 50% being vaccinated? I'd think it would be 1/4 or 1/5th.So if you compare September of 2020 to September of 2021, you get some interesting numbers:
In the latter, we had 4 times as many cases and twice as many deaths. What's odd about this is that the Alpha variant was almost 3 times as deadly as delta while being about 1/2 as transmissable. Statistically this doesn't make any sense, and can really only lead to 1 of 2 conclusions: either the vaccines are actually making it more likely to die from covid if you catch it, or they're counting people as being covid deaths that shouldn't be (or that there is a rising additional factor at play). The vaccine explanation makes no sense, so clearly it must be the 2nd explanation.
In the same time period, the UK had 7 times as many cases and 10x as many deaths, so the virus actually became more deadly there.If the control group shows that delta is 1/3rd as deadly as alpha, shouldn't the death rate for the entire population be even lower than that with 50% being vaccinated? I'd think it would be 1/4 or 1/5th.
Nobody give a fukc about you anymore and your stupid Twitter articles
“IT professionals” deciding what information is worthy and what is not. Am I supposed to be for that or not?
OK, now that one is pretty good.“IT professionals” deciding what information is worthy and what is not. Am I supposed to be for that or not?
Regarding that disclaimer: can those health professionals tell me what level of antibodies is enough to keep someone from getting really sick from covid? Is it like a blanket level that's the same for everyone, or is it an individual basis type of thing?
Regarding that disclaimer: can those health professionals tell me what level of antibodies is enough to keep someone from getting really sick from covid? Is it like a blanket level that's the same for everyone, or is it an individual basis type of thing?
OK, now that one is pretty good.
OK, now that one is pretty good.
“IT professionals” deciding what information is worthy and what is not. Am I supposed to be for that or not?
This is why I'm against a Booster mandate... utterly so.
Then explain why you are here right now. You say there are better things to do but you're focused on a circle jerk.
Tailgating with friends and women. Something you wouldn’t know what to do with sitting at home playing with yourselfThen explain why you are here right now. You say there are better things to do but you're focused on a circle jerk.
Weird. And yet you're paying attention to what I post instead of focusing on friends and women. Loser.Tailgating with friends and women. Something you wouldn’t know what to do with sitting at home playing with yourself
Hello s pWeird. And yet you're paying attention to what I post instead of focusing on friends and women. Loser.
“IT professionals” deciding what information is worthy and what is not. Am I supposed to be for that or not?
Indeed. I point this out regularly to non-IT people too (in my career).OK, now that one is pretty good.
Yes ... we could test for the full spectrum of IgA+IgG+IgM anti-bodies.Regarding that disclaimer: can those health professionals tell me what level of antibodies is enough to keep someone from getting really sick from covid? Is it like a blanket level that's the same for everyone, or is it an individual basis type of thing?
It does make sense if you understand math at all. Twice as transmissible is per transmission. The virus spreads via a chain of transmissions. Twice as transmissible is equal to 64 times more likely for it to survive a transmission chain of 6 people. Just for an example.So if you compare September of 2020 to September of 2021, you get some interesting numbers:
In the latter, we had 4 times as many cases and twice as many deaths. What's odd about this is that the Alpha variant was almost 3 times as deadly as delta while being about 1/2 as transmissable. Statistically this doesn't make any sense, and can really only lead to 1 of 2 conclusions: either the vaccines are actually making it more likely to die from covid if you catch it, or they're counting people as being covid deaths that shouldn't be (or that there is a rising additional factor at play). The vaccine explanation makes no sense, so clearly it must be the 2nd explanation.
It doesn't make sense because the numbers aren't commensurate with each other.It does make sense if you understand math at all. Twice as transmissible is per transmission. The virus spreads via a chain of transmissions. Twice as transmissible is equal to 64 times more likely for it to survive a transmission chain of 6 people. Just for an example.
It makes sense that you’re a fukcing loserIt doesn't make sense because the numbers aren't commensurate with each other.
It does make sense if you understand math at all. Twice as transmissible is per transmission. The virus spreads via a chain of transmissions. Twice as transmissible is equal to 64 times more likely for it to survive a transmission chain of 6 people. Just for an example.
And isn't backed up by studies at all. The studies are showing it doesn't even halve secondary transmission overall -- not just per incident -- against Delta when the shots are in 'full effect.'It doesn't make sense because the numbers aren't commensurate with each other.
Anti-Vax behavior? interesting phrasing.Good grief. Yeah, let's equate today's anti-vax behavior with Trump hyping a yet-to-be-developed vaccine last year before the election.
It was announced on Nov. 9th AFTER the election and even then, it STILL had to receive FDA emergency approval.It was developed and in the testing phase.
Define 'old school'?Honest question: will the people not taking the vaccine because of RNA-whatever go get vaccinated once the old-school vaccine comes out? Will they find problems with the eggs, horses or whatever they use to produce it?