Unless gus is hiding a few things, seemed like QB protection was so so. Opening up the middle lane?????? where was it besides the wild knight play? THOUGHTS?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless gus is hiding a few things, seemed like QB protection was so so. Opening up the middle lane?????? where was it besides the wild knight play? THOUGHTS?
We definitely had success with speed running a sweep or outside.The Oline really didn't get any push in the first quarter, nearly the whole first half. The blocking on the perimeter by the receivers (despite all the talk about playing well without the ball) was just as bad. In the first quarter, UCF tried run outside with quick tosses, but the receivers couldn't control their blocks.
The end result was good though.
Another positive note, UCF lost only 5 yards rushing. So even though the Knights didn't always get a lot of push, they did get a hat on a hat. And apparently, on the right hats.
Indeed, hard to tell based on the competition, but there was more time last night.OL was much improved from last year in my opinion. In pass protection the pocket had way more time, last year not so much. It was Kent St though, I’ll wait to judge everything until after Boise St.
Indeed, it was. McDonald is quite the specimen. His long strides are deceptiveI missed the game. So the Wild Knight is back? Was it effective?
#5 is pure power!!!!!Indeed, it was. McDonald is quite the specimen. His long strides are deceptive