ADVERTISEMENT

President joe Biden calls on congress to end $40 billion in taxpayer subsidies for fossil fuels

ElprofesorJuan

Five-Star Recruit
Sep 4, 2019
961
452
63
Direct Subsidies
Intangible Drilling Costs Deduction (26 U.S. Code § 263. Active). This provision allows companies to deduct a majority of the costs incurred from drilling new wells domestically. In its analysis of President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Proposal, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated that eliminating tax breaks for intangible drilling costs would generate $1.59 billion in revenue in 2017, or $13 billion in the next ten years.

Percentage Depletion (26 U.S. Code § 613. Active). Depletion is an accounting method that works much like depreciation, allowing businesses to deduct a certain amount from their taxable income as a reflection of declining production from a reserve over time. However, with standard cost depletion, if a firm were to extract 10 percent of recoverable oil from a property, the depletion expense would be ten percent of capital costs. In contrast, percentage depletion allows firms to deduct a set percentage from their taxable income. Because percentage depletion is not based on capital costs, total deductions can exceed capital costs. This provision is limited to independent producers and royalty owners. In its analysis of the President’s Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Proposal, the JCT estimated that eliminating percentage depletion for coal, oil and natural gas would generate $12.9 billion in the next ten years.

Credit for Clean Coal Investment Internal Revenue Code § 48A (Active) and 48B (Inactive). These subsidies create a series of tax credits for energy investments, particularly for coal. In 2005, Congress authorized $1.5 billion in credits for integrated gasification combined cycle properties, with $800 million of this amount reserved specifically for coal projects. In 2008, additional incentives for carbon sequestration were added to IRC § 48B and 48A. These included 30 percent investment credits, which were made available for gasification projects that sequester 75 percent of carbon emissions, as well as advanced coal projects that sequester 65 percent of carbon emissions. Eliminating credits for investment in these projects would save $1 billion between 2017 and 2026.

Nonconventional Fuels Tax Credit (Internal Revenue Code § 45. Inactive). Sunsetted in 2014, this tax credit was created by the Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax Act of 1980 to promote domestic energy production and reduce dependence on foreign oil. Although amendments to the act limited the list of qualifying fuel sources, this credit provided $12.2 billion to the coal industry from 2002-2010.

Indirect Subsidies
Last In, First Out Accounting (26 U.S. Code § 472. Active). The Last In, First Out accounting method (LIFO) allows oil and gas companies to sell the fuel most recently added to their reserves first, as opposed to selling older reserves first under the traditional First In, First Out (FIFO) method. This allows the most expensive reserves to be sold first, reducing the value of their inventory for taxation purposes.

Foreign Tax Credit (26 U.S. Code § 901. Active). Typically, when firms operating in foreign countries pay royalties abroad they can deduct these expenses from their taxable income. Instead of claiming royalty payments as deductions, oil and gas companies are able to treat them as fully deductible foreign income tax. In 2016, the JCT estimated that closing this loophole for all American businesses operating in countries that do not tax corporate income would generate $12.7 billion in tax revenue over the course of the following decade.

Master Limited Partnerships (Internal Revenue Code § 7704. Indirect. Active). Many oil and gas companies are structured as Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). This structure combines the investment advantages of publicly traded corporations with the tax benefits of partnerships. While shareholders still pay personal income tax, the MLP itself is exempt from corporate income taxes. More than three-quarters of MLPs are fossil fuel companies. This provision is not available to renewable energy companies.

Domestic Manufacturing Deduction (IRC §199. Indirect. Inactive). Put in place in 2004, this subsidy supported a range of companies by decreasing their effective corporate tax rate. While this deduction was available to domestic manufacturers, it nevertheless benefitted fossil fuel companies by allowing “oil producers to claim a tax break intended for U.S. manufacturers to prevent job outsourcing”. The Office of Management and Budget estimated that repealing this deduction for coal and other hard mineral fossil fuels would have saved $173 million between 2012 and 2016. This subsidy was repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115 – 97) starting fiscal year 2018.

I think its a good start these Energy companies have taken advantage long enough.
 
So an allowable deduction is a "subsidy"? Do I get a subsidy when I use the child tax credit or mortgage interest deduction?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Are you willing to give up your government subsidies?
I'm guessing that at some point, cutting back on our various subsidies is going to have to be addressed if we ever expect to end our running annual federal budget deficits, let alone try to cut into it.

The funny thing is, conservatives talk a big game about cutting back on our social welfare programs while defending all kinds of government subsidies that -- surprise, surprise -- benefit them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
I'm guessing that at some point, cutting back on our various subsidies is going to have to be addressed if we ever expect to end our running annual federal budget deficits, let alone try to cut into it.

The funny thing is, conservatives talk a big game about cutting back on our social welfare programs while defending all kinds of government subsidies that -- surprise, surprise -- benefit them.
The problem that I have with this is calling them subsidies. I think we can both agree that the tax code is far too complicated and some deductions should be deleted and some depreciation schedules should have an adjusted time frame. Its not like by deducting 1000 dollars in mortgage interest off of your return is the equivalent of the government sending you a check for 1000 dollars.
 
The problem that I have with this is calling them subsidies. I think we can both agree that the tax code is far too complicated and some deductions should be deleted and some depreciation schedules should have an adjusted time frame. Its not like by deducting 1000 dollars in mortgage interest off of your return is the equivalent of the government sending you a check for 1000 dollars.
If my tax bill is $1000 LESS than it would have been without it, that's $1000 in my pocket, whatever name you want to give it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
If my tax bill is $1000 LESS than it would have been without it, that's $1000 in my pocket, whatever name you want to give it.
That’s $1000 of your money the government didn’t take. I wouldn’t call the government stealing less than they could a subsidy.

As far as I can tell it looks like a tax break was given to the oil companies. Probably under the guise of encouraging growth. I’m sure the startup costs to drill for oil is expensive, but I’m also sure that the oil companies are doing just fine and love to grow their field sizes and production ability. Raising the cost to produce oil will be passed on to the consumer in one form or the other. It might take a few years, but the raising fuel prices causes production and shipping prices to rise for almost everything. This will seriously slow economic recovery (if it’s ever allowed to happen).
 
The problem that I have with this is calling them subsidies. I think we can both agree that the tax code is far too complicated and some deductions should be deleted and some depreciation schedules should have an adjusted time frame. Its not like by deducting 1000 dollars in mortgage interest off of your return is the equivalent of the government sending you a check for 1000 dollars.
The reframing of tax credits as subsidies is frustrating as hell. Tax credits are not subsidies. In subsidies, you take from one entity and give it to another to stabilize the price or availability of necessary items. Tax credits simply don’t take from an entity and either incentivize a desired behavior or create a more even playing field for entrants into an industry or activity. You cannot call money not owed to the government a subsidy.

Here’s another look at it:https://reason.com/2011/05/17/the-difference-between-a-tax-b/
 
Direct Subsidies
Intangible Drilling Costs Deduction (26 U.S. Code § 263. Active). This provision allows companies to deduct a majority of the costs incurred from drilling new wells domestically. In its analysis of President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Proposal, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated that eliminating tax breaks for intangible drilling costs would generate $1.59 billion in revenue in 2017, or $13 billion in the next ten years.

Percentage Depletion (26 U.S. Code § 613. Active). Depletion is an accounting method that works much like depreciation, allowing businesses to deduct a certain amount from their taxable income as a reflection of declining production from a reserve over time. However, with standard cost depletion, if a firm were to extract 10 percent of recoverable oil from a property, the depletion expense would be ten percent of capital costs. In contrast, percentage depletion allows firms to deduct a set percentage from their taxable income. Because percentage depletion is not based on capital costs, total deductions can exceed capital costs. This provision is limited to independent producers and royalty owners. In its analysis of the President’s Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Proposal, the JCT estimated that eliminating percentage depletion for coal, oil and natural gas would generate $12.9 billion in the next ten years.

Credit for Clean Coal Investment Internal Revenue Code § 48A (Active) and 48B (Inactive). These subsidies create a series of tax credits for energy investments, particularly for coal. In 2005, Congress authorized $1.5 billion in credits for integrated gasification combined cycle properties, with $800 million of this amount reserved specifically for coal projects. In 2008, additional incentives for carbon sequestration were added to IRC § 48B and 48A. These included 30 percent investment credits, which were made available for gasification projects that sequester 75 percent of carbon emissions, as well as advanced coal projects that sequester 65 percent of carbon emissions. Eliminating credits for investment in these projects would save $1 billion between 2017 and 2026.

Nonconventional Fuels Tax Credit (Internal Revenue Code § 45. Inactive). Sunsetted in 2014, this tax credit was created by the Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax Act of 1980 to promote domestic energy production and reduce dependence on foreign oil. Although amendments to the act limited the list of qualifying fuel sources, this credit provided $12.2 billion to the coal industry from 2002-2010.

Indirect Subsidies
Last In, First Out Accounting (26 U.S. Code § 472. Active). The Last In, First Out accounting method (LIFO) allows oil and gas companies to sell the fuel most recently added to their reserves first, as opposed to selling older reserves first under the traditional First In, First Out (FIFO) method. This allows the most expensive reserves to be sold first, reducing the value of their inventory for taxation purposes.

Foreign Tax Credit (26 U.S. Code § 901. Active). Typically, when firms operating in foreign countries pay royalties abroad they can deduct these expenses from their taxable income. Instead of claiming royalty payments as deductions, oil and gas companies are able to treat them as fully deductible foreign income tax. In 2016, the JCT estimated that closing this loophole for all American businesses operating in countries that do not tax corporate income would generate $12.7 billion in tax revenue over the course of the following decade.

Master Limited Partnerships (Internal Revenue Code § 7704. Indirect. Active). Many oil and gas companies are structured as Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). This structure combines the investment advantages of publicly traded corporations with the tax benefits of partnerships. While shareholders still pay personal income tax, the MLP itself is exempt from corporate income taxes. More than three-quarters of MLPs are fossil fuel companies. This provision is not available to renewable energy companies.

Domestic Manufacturing Deduction (IRC §199. Indirect. Inactive). Put in place in 2004, this subsidy supported a range of companies by decreasing their effective corporate tax rate. While this deduction was available to domestic manufacturers, it nevertheless benefitted fossil fuel companies by allowing “oil producers to claim a tax break intended for U.S. manufacturers to prevent job outsourcing”. The Office of Management and Budget estimated that repealing this deduction for coal and other hard mineral fossil fuels would have saved $173 million between 2012 and 2016. This subsidy was repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115 – 97) starting fiscal year 2018.

I think its a good start these Energy companies have taken advantage long enough.
Excellent post Professor!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
As a conservative, I am ok with ending Oil subsidies. Should end them for Green energy and almost everything else as well. Get out of education and send it back to the states, Get out of big pharma, Farming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Reminder that around 49% of Americans pay no federal taxes. The 51% pay for your lazy @sses. The top 5% pay almost all the federal taxes. Next time thank a top 5%er.
Agree. I am in the 51% that pay, but not in the top few % that carry the burden. I used to pay quite a bit more before Reagan and then Trump,
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT