ADVERTISEMENT

President Trump to release Epstein client list?

  • Haha
Reactions: UCFBS

Leftists have begged for this to happen for years, how will they spin it if he actually does?

They all need to be released as is, absolutely NO redactions.

If they are, it's 100% a win for Trump. If the documents come back with redactions. meh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hemightbejeremy
They all need to be released as is, absolutely NO redactions.

If they are, it's 100% a win for Trump. If the documents come back with redactions. meh.
i wouldn't get your hopes up. Who knows if he is on the list or not, but I would at least guess some people he knows and who probably donate to him are.
 
i wouldn't get your hopes up. Who knows if he is on the list or not, but I would at least guess some people he knows and who probably donate to him are.
so this is how they'll spin it. claiming a guy who has been a celebrity for the past 40+ years may know other celebrities is a brave take.

after 8 years of nonstop ree'ing and investigations, this is the one where all involved parties swore to secrecy.
 
so this is how they'll spin it. claiming a guy who has been a celebrity for the past 40+ years may know other celebrities is a brave take.

after 8 years of nonstop ree'ing and investigations, this is the one where all involved parties swore to secrecy.
I literally posted a video with his own words, where he certainly doesnt come across as eager to release it, and says he doesnt want to affect peoples lives, because there is a of phony stuff in their. I don't know how you say I am spinning it when I posted a video of his own words.
 
I literally posted a video with his own words, where he certainly doesnt come across as eager to release it, and says he doesnt want to affect peoples lives, because there is a of phony stuff in their. I don't know how you say I am spinning it when I posted a video of his own words.
reporter: "Would you declassify the Epstein files?"
President Trump: "Yeah, yeah, I would"

Said he would, now he's moving to keep good on that promise. All of your conspiratorial opining after is just that.
 
reporter: "Would you declassify the Epstein files?"
President Trump: "Yeah, yeah, I would"

Said he would, now he's moving to keep good on that promise. All of your conspiratorial opining after is just that.
He said a lot more than that, so you sure I am the one spinning? He also said 'maybe less so because you don't want to affect peoples live because there is a lot of phony stuff in there'. Weird how you left that part out. But at the end of the day he either will release it all, release a heavily redacted version of it, or he won't release it. We will just have to wait and see.
 
I actually think Trump has a point in that clip though. The public certainly has a right to know who was actually involved in the trafficking or took part in it underage sex, but that also doesn't mean everyone who ever associated with Epstein was a part it. He was a legitimate businessman so there are other reasons for people meeting with him. So they do need to release actual details and not just names.
 
He said a lot more than that, so you sure I am the one spinning? He also said 'maybe less so because you don't want to affect peoples live because there is a lot of phony stuff in there'. Weird how you left that part out. But at the end of the day he either will release it all, release a heavily redacted version of it, or he won't release it. We will just have to wait and see.
said he would, and now he's going to.

hope this helps.
 
said he would, and now he's going to.

hope this helps.
And when he does I will give him credit for it (unless it is heavily redacted), but at this point he hasnt, so not giving him credit for something he hasn't done yet. Hope this helps.
 
Are we talking about the Epstein list or taxes?
Epstein list, his tax returns are right here. Good question and I'm glad you're in favor of auditing the government and its officials.
And when he does I will give him credit for it (unless it is heavily redacted), but at this point he hasnt, so not giving him credit for something he hasn't done yet. Hope this helps.
Of course you'll be the arbiter of whether or not he released them the correct way. It gives you the ultimate position of criticizing the move whether it happens or not.

Anyways, 2 waters and we're ready to order.
 
Epstein list, his tax returns are right here. Good question and I'm glad you're in favor of auditing the government and its officials.

Of course you'll be the arbiter of whether or not he released them the correct way. It gives you the ultimate position of criticizing the move whether it happens or not.

Anyways, 2 waters and we're ready to order.
So if he releases the info with all kinds of names blacked out you'll be ok with that?

And quit being helpless and get your own water geek.
 
So if he releases the info with all kinds of names blacked out you'll be ok with that?

And quit being helpless and get your own water geek.
Will cross that bridge when we come to it, you've clearly made up your mind already.

No lemon, by the way.
 
Will cross that bridge when we come to it, you've clearly made up your mind already.

No lemon, by the way.
Good lord dude, you are trying to give him credit for releasing it, before he has even released it, but I'm the one who has made up his mind? If we are going to cross that bridge when we get there, then shouldn't we get to the bridge first before giving him any sort of critiscism or credit ?

You need a lemon to shove up your ass or something? Need to freshen up?
 
Last edited:
Good lord dude, you are trying to give him credit for releasing it, before he has even released it, but I'm the one who has made up his mind? If we are going to cross that bridge when we get there, then shouldn't we get to the bridge first before giving him any sort of critiscism or credit ?

You need a lemon to shove up your ass or something? Need to freshen up?
Never said he did, Mr "b-b-but it's gonna be heavily redacted because his donors are probably on there."

In fact, the title of the thread has a question mark in it.

In fact,
Leftists have begged for this to happen for years, how will they spin it if he actually does?
And yes, we're ready to order.
 
Never said he did, Mr "b-b-but it's gonna be heavily redacted because his donors are probably on there."

In fact, the title of the thread has a question mark in it.

In fact,

And yes, we're ready to order.
I said "if", do you know what "if" means? And btw, my first post was to joe who also brought up if they are redacted, so is he spinning too?

Serious question. What is the point of pretending to be stupid on this board? I don't think you are stupid, but you clearly understand what I am saying, yet still want to argue about something that seems pretty common sense.

If you want to order today's special is my nuts in your mouth, so put you down for 2?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: thall_
Early release of the list is out. Unfortunately it is redacted.

IMG-8949.jpg
 
I said "if", do you know what "if" means? And btw, my first post was to joe who also brought up if they are redacted, so is he spinning too?

Serious question. What is the point of pretending to be stupid on this board? I don't think you are stupid, but you clearly understand what I am saying, yet still want to argue about something that seems pretty common sense.

If you want to order today's special is my nuts in your mouth, so put you down for 2?
That’s a lot of ree’ing.

Hysterics aside, why didn’t Biden/Kamala release all the Epstein files?

If you want to order today's special is my nuts in your mouth, so put you down for 2?
Oh you took it off the kids menu?
 
That’s a lot of ree’ing.

Hysterics aside, why didn’t Biden/Kamala release all the Epstein files?


Oh you took it off the kids menu?
I dont know. But Why didn't Trump? He was arrested on 2019, and was dead in 2019. Why didn't Trump release anything in the year and a half he was still president? The reality is we don't even know what information they have. Every one talks about a 'list', as if there is some list out their with all of this stuff, but my guess is that there isn't any such list and that it's a lot more convoluted than what people are treating as. Which means it probably takes a while to get it sorted out, especially since he was dead before he went to trial.
 
Last edited:
Here was @Cubs79 take when Biden was President:
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/epstein-documents-trump.html So Trump is all over the new Epstein files released, and yet the same people yelling "pedo" for almost 8 years now at anyone who disagrees with them about anything, are pretty quiet about it.
Interesting how it was Bible then. Surely you always felt that way, right?

Wait, this you in 2019?
We also have to remember that Epstein is a billionaire and people did actually do legitimate business with him. So just because a person was around him does not automatically equate to them being involved in the sex trafficking or child raping part of Epstein's life.
Weird how it couldn’t be trusted when Trump when President.

Don’t tell me you’re back to not trusting it now that Trump is president again. Oh wait

Every one talks about a 'list', as if there is some list out their with all of this stuff, but my guess is that there isn't any such list and that it's a lot more convoluted than what people are treating as. Which means it probably takes a while to get it sorted out, especially since he was dead before he went to trial.
Just say you’re mad that your team didn’t release it and you’re worried about the ramifications, it’s okay.
 
Here was @Cubs79 take when Biden was President:

Interesting how it was Bible then. Surely you always felt that way, right?

Wait, this you in 2019?

Weird how it couldn’t be trusted when Trump when President.

Don’t tell me you’re back to not trusting it now that Trump is president again. Oh wait


Just say you’re mad that your team didn’t release it and you’re worried about the ramifications, it’s okay.
https://ucf.forums.rivals.com/threads/epsteins-list.114835/post-3249767 and here is you completely dismissing it. And I didn't treat it as the Bible, i just found it interesting that you and others on here who scream pedophile at anyone you disagree with somehow give Trump the benefit of the doubt, which is said in that exact post.

My post from 2019 is literally saying the exact same thing I am saying now, so not exactly sure your point with that supposed gotcha.

I'll go ahead and add my whole post for you since you decided to pick and choose parts of it instead of posting the whole thing.

I think semantics is the issue. If I take a round trip to Hawaii (or wherever) with a layover, in LA, then I would technically be on 4 flight logs total, but I personally would only say I took one trip.

I think Clinton is a slimey dude, so it certainly wouldnt shock me if something came out of this with regards to him. Honestly, I feel the same with regards to Trump. But in saying that, we also have to remember that Epstein is a billionaire and people did actually do legitimate business with him. So just because a person was around him does not automatically equate to them being involved in the sex trafficking or child raping part of Epstein's life. I think we will obviously get the partisan angles on both Clinton and Trump from people, but until we actually see evidence then we need to keep in mind that is is simply rumor.
 
My post from 2019 is literally saying the exact same thing I am saying now, so not exactly sure your point with that supposed gotcha.
you're so close.

2019 - Trump was President, you ree'd that the Epstein files are just a rumor
2025 - Trump is President, ree'ing that even if it is real, its only admissible if it incriminates Trump, and if it doesn't then its convoluted and doesn't matter

2024 - Biden was President, ree'ing about "newly released Epstein files" and how they suddenly matter

hope that helps
 
you're so close.

2019 - Trump was President, you ree'd that the Epstein files are just a rumor
2025 - Trump is President, ree'ing that even if it is real, its only admissible if it incriminates Trump, and if it doesn't then its convoluted and doesn't matter

2024 - Biden was President, ree'ing about "newly released Epstein files" and how they suddenly matter

hope that helps
I didn't say anything about it only being real if it is incriminating Trump, you just made that up. I said if it's released with a bunch of redactions, then it's probably not really telling us much, because ya know, it's redacted which by definition isn't showing us everything.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT