Roger Stone arrested by the FBI

[UCFKnight85]

In the same post you say that Stone has been staying home on Fridays because he's expecting to be arrested you also find it inexplicable that CNN would also be at his home on Fridays expecting him to be arrested. Amazing.

In that same post I also say that this has been going on for months. You chose to ignore that of course. Amazing.

Unless you can show me proof where CNN has had a camera crew, and on air talent, waiting outside Stone's house for 5-6 months every single Thursday night/Friday morning. Can you do that?

 

[DaShuckster]

Unless you can show me proof where CNN has had a camera crew, and on air talent, waiting outside Stone's house for 5-6 months every single Thursday night/Friday morning. Can you do that?

ROTFLMAO. Yet another Trump cronie gets rolled for his misbehavior by the FBI and this red hat clown thinks the REAL STORY is about how CNN covered the story live.

You can't make stuff up.

 

[UCFBS]

You would think if the FBI really cared about the Wikileaks and the emails they would have actually looked at the DNC server. Oh wait, the DNC blocked the FBI from that, go figure.

Credit Clinton, she had excellent lawyers who got the DOJ to agree to its terms. No seizure of assets, despite classified spillage ... a first I've ever heard of.

Until a special investigator is assigned to Clinton like Trump, none of this will be investigated. If one wants that, let Clinton win in 2020. Although Judicial Watch continues to pursue The Podesta Group, and why the Russians hacked his e-mail account before he even became Clinton's campaign manager.

I.e., The Podesta Group was far more involved with the Russians than any Trump associate ever was. That's just fact, and all in the State records they have had FOIA'd. Every major law group with an international practice, on both sides of the isle, were involved ... Moscow paid very well to represent their interests in Kiev and other, former SSRs.

 

[DaShuckster]

Credit Clinton, she had excellent lawyers who got the DOJ to agree to its terms. No seizure of assets, despite classified spillage ... a first I've ever heard of.

Good grief, why would the DNC agree to have their server seized? Do you think the RNC would have agreed to turn over their server if the roles were reversed? Of course not.

Until a special investigator is assigned to Clinton like Trump, none of this will be investigated. If one wants that, let Clinton win in 2020.

If you actually believe that Clinton will run in 2020, I'll be happy to bet you. I know it must be difficult for you MAGA Hats to let go of your favorite boogieman, er boogiegirl, but time marches on.

You might also want to give up on your tried-and-true "b-b-but THEY did it too!!!" schtick. Not only is it a lame as hell excuse, it's not true.

 

[fried-chicken]

In that same post I also say that this has been going on for months. You chose to ignore that of course. Amazing.

Unless you can show me proof where CNN has had a camera crew, and on air talent, waiting outside Stone's house for 5-6 months every single Thursday night/Friday morning. Can you do that?

There's a pretty good article that describes why they were there. (No on air talent was there by the way)

But it's probably easier for you to just go with the hair-brained idea that Mueller is choosing now to start leaking arrest details.

 

[UCFKnight85]

There's a pretty good article that describes why they were there. (No on air talent was there by the way)

But it's probably easier for you to just go with the hair-brained idea that Mueller is choosing now to start leaking arrest details.

Holy hell, this last sentence is amazing irony since you chose to run with a fake news story just recently because...…..you thought Mueller's team was leaking details to Buzzfeed.

 

[fried-chicken]

Holy hell, this last sentence is amazing irony since you chose to run with a fake news story just recently because...…..you thought Mueller's team was leaking details to Buzzfeed.

I thought the SDNY was leaking which was accurate as usual.

 

[UCFKnight85]

I thought the SDNY was leaking which was accurate as usual.

It was SO accurate that Mueller took the unheard of step in denouncing the accuracy of the story.



Again, I'm tickled that @Trel MK chimed in earlier to state that rightes can't admit when we're wrong, since you and @DaShuckster have made a living at doing this for the past 1-2 months here.

 

[fried-chicken]

It was SO accurate that Mueller took the unheard of step in denouncing the accuracy of the story.



Again, I'm tickled that @Trel MK chimed in earlier to state that rightes can't admit when we're wrong, since you and @DaShuckster have made a living at doing this for the past 1-2 months here.

Excuse me, you do know that you've been wrong about Mueller for the last 2 years and it's easy to find documented posts of you wiffing time and time again and that trend will only continue. Yet I haven't seen you admit to being wrong a single time. Should I pull some quotes again?

 

[goodknightfl]

Patrick AFB very busy with large jets taking off this AM. I think they are making a TP run to FBI to help with all the BS going on.

 

[UCFKnight85]

Excuse me, you do know that you've been wrong about Mueller for the last 2 years and it's easy to find documented posts of you wiffing time and time again and that trend will only continue. Yet I haven't seen you admit to being wrong a single time. Should I pull some quotes again?

If it makes you feel better then sure. If that's your way of deflecting from the Buzzfeed story debacle, have at it. I've always thought this investigation would wipe out some of the scuzzballs like Manafort and Cohen but that's not the big prize here, is it? You guys so desperately want to lead a de facto coup against Trump and need something to do it. That's why you were soooooooooooo giddy when the Buzzfeed fake news piece came out.

 

[UCFKnight85]

For example, I was wrong about Cohen but not in the context you want. I said that there was no campaign finance law broken and no collusion with Russia present. This was uncovered to be true BUT he went to prison anyways since he lied to investigators.

 

[fried-chicken]

For example, I was wrong about Cohen but not in the context you want. I said that there was no campaign finance law broken and no collusion with Russia present. This was uncovered to be true BUT he went to prison anyways since he lied to investigators.

That's not true he was convicted of campaign finance violations.

 

[UCFBS]

That's not true he was convicted of campaign finance violations.

It's pretty weak. It's just the one count of hush money.

• 5 counts of tax evasion
• 1 count of false statements (financial institution)
• 1 count of willful, unlawful corporate contribution
• 1 count of excessive campaign contribution, at the request of a candidate

Again, pretty weak. If this is all they have, I don't know what to tell you. But at least it's more than they had on Libby.

Libby's conviction was a joke, especially after Armitage came forward, who was never, ever charged. Still never understood how that justified jailing a reporter. But Dems gonna Dem.

 

[fried-chicken]

It's pretty weak. It's just the one count of hush money.

• 5 counts of tax evasion
• 1 count of false statements (financial institution)
• 1 count of willful, unlawful corporate contribution
• 1 count of excessive campaign contribution, at the request of a candidate

Again, pretty weak. If this is all they have, I don't know what to tell you. But at least it's more than they had on Libby.

Libby's conviction was a joke, especially after Armitage came forward, who was never, ever charged. Still never understood how that justified jailing a reporter. But Dems gonna Dem.

The post I was replying too said he was only convicted of false statements. As you have pointed out, that post is not correct and my post is. Yet it seems your tone is argumentative while supporting my possition. Very intriguing.

 

[DaShuckster]

What a shocker!!! Roger Stone found guilty of seven counts of obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and making false statements.

That's really strange 'cause he was allegedly the Trump Campaign's go-between with Wikileaks / Russia. I could have sworn I heard Russian collusion was fake news?

https://www.businessinsider.com/roger-stone-convicted-false-statements-witness-tampering-2019-11

 

[UCFWayne]

laws were broken and he will pay the price.

 

[DaShuckster]

laws were broken and he will pay the price.

Unless he's pardoned.

 

[UCFWayne]

Unless he's pardoned.

i doubt that happens. maybe on jan 19th 2025 though.

 

[firm_bizzle]

Another guilty Trumper.

 

[OregonKnight]

Unless he's pardoned.

Pardoning him would be foolish, as he can no longer plead the 5th and it’s an admission to his crimes. He could also be forced to testify in future cases.

 

[KnighttimeJoe]

Gonna be hard for Stoner to smoke dope in the slammer.

 

[fried-chicken]

So many criminals from one campaign. Hahaha

 

[NinjaKnight]

 

[firm_bizzle]

If they wanted to put Hillary in jail they should have hired her.

 

[sk8knight]

If they wanted to put Hillary in jail they should have hired her.

Lol. This may be the truest thing you’ve said in awhile.

 

[NinjaKnight]

If they wanted to put Hillary in jail they should have hired her.

I've literally lost count of how many of his personally hired people have been indicted and are serving federal prison time.

Imagine being so fuking stupid that you are still defending Trump in 2019

 

[fried-chicken]

Imagine thinking trump is anti corruption when his 2016 campaign HQ has been relocated to cell block D

 

[jj1987]

Anyone remember when space coast posted he's a great guy?

Character witness for a multiple conviction felon.

 

[UCFBS]

The post I was replying too said he was only convicted of false statements. As you have pointed out, that post is not correct and my post is. Yet it seems your tone is argumentative while supporting my possition. Very intriguing.

You keep thinking I'm a Republican and a Trump voter. What I'm saying is that this is pretty weak, and far less than what others have been convicted over.

I've literally lost count of how many of his personally hired people have been indicted and are serving federal prison time.
Imagine being so fuking stupid that you are still defending Trump in 2019

Just as many as Clinton, but unlike Trump, those people were actually part of the same business deals as Clinton. Trump had nothing to do with the reasons why those people were convicted.

But in Clinton's case, apparently that wasn't enough to deter her for running in 2016. Seriously ... short term memory of Democrats are just hypocrisy taken to an extreme. That's why I want them all gone.

Imagine thinking trump is anti corruption when his 2016 campaign HQ has been relocated to cell block D

If so, where is Hillary's? Oh, that's right, her lawyers negotiated a 'Get out of jail free' card with the DoJ, so the FBI had their hands tied behind their backs.

And she escaped Whitewater et al. as well. Not a shocker. Trump is as stubborn as they come, Hillary is just far more cunning ... and ensured CGI was overseas too.

But at least Podesta is smart. He hasn't peeped at all. If he did, it would be all over for him.

 

[NinjaKnight]

laws were broken and he will pay the price.

Lmao

 

[DaShuckster]

laws were broken and he will pay the price.

And lookie at what my response was back in November, 2019:

Unless he's pardoned.

I'd like to take credit but in reality, anyone with half-a-brain knew this was eventually coming. Stone had Trump by the balls.

 

[Crazyhole]

I lose track of where you guys stand on things sometimes. I thought we had all decided that leakers were good, so wikileaks was one of the good guys. That would make Stone a good guy too, right?

 

[DaShuckster]

I thought we had all decided that leakers were good

Maybe you decided that Edward Snowden was a good guy when he leaked top-secret information and then fled to...(drumroll)...Russia. But most of us call that being a traitor (you know, kind of like those Confederate Generals.)

Snowden's escape to Russia pretty much proved the long-held suspicion that Wikileaks was a front for Russian Intelligence. The pivotal role that Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange played in getting Snowden from Hawaii to Moscow is a matter of record.

The interesting thing about good ole Roger Stone is that he was the one person who could link Russia through Wikileaks directly to the Trump Campaign (you know, that Russian collusion 'hoax'.) It was a real shocker that this convicted felon was pardoned last night before beginning his sentence next week.

But Trump said he did it because Stone had been 'treated unfairly' by our judicial system so it's all good, right guys?

 

[Crazyhole]

Maybe you decided that Edward Snowden was a good guy when he leaked top-secret information and then fled to...(drumroll)...Russia. But most of us call that being a traitor (you know, kind of like those Confederate Generals.)

Snowden's escape to Russia pretty much proved the long-held suspicion that Wikileaks was a front for Russian Intelligence. The pivotal role that Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange played in getting Snowden from Hawaii to Moscow is a matter of record.

The interesting thing about good ole Roger Stone is that he was the one person who could link Russia through Wikileaks directly to the Trump Campaign (you know, that Russian collusion 'hoax'.) It was a real shocker that this convicted felon was pardoned last night before beginning his sentence next week.

But Trump said he did it because Stone had been 'treated unfairly' by our judicial system so it's all good, right guys?

So all leakers are traitors.

 

[DaShuckster]

I thought we had all decided that leakers were good, so wikileaks was one of the good guys. That would make Stone a good guy too, right?

So all leakers are traitors.

Geez, make up your mind which way you want to troll this issue.

 

[Crazyhole]

Geez, make up your mind which way you want to troll this issue.

I just dont know which way you guys want it. I thought it was that all leakers were good, but apparently leakers are traitors.

I'll say this to your invoking of snowden: he leaked information about the government taking unconstitutional actions against American citizens. I support doing that 100% of the time.

 

[DaShuckster]

I'll say this to your invoking of snowden: he leaked information about the government taking unconstitutional actions against American citizens. I support doing that 100% of the time.

I'm all for Snowden returning to the US and fighting his case against the government in court. But for some strange reason you want to ignore the whole Russia - Wikileaks connection.

If Stone were to spill his guts, the Trump Campaign's direct connection with Russian agents would be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. So it's no surprise at all that Roger Stone was such a cocky SOB before -- and after -- being charged and convicted by the government of a crime that would have put him behind bars for the rest of his life.

He knew all along he'd never see jail time.

 

[Crazyhole]

I'm all for Snowden returning to the US and fighting his case against the government in court. But for some strange reason you want to ignore the whole Russia - Wikileaks connection.

If Stone were to spill his guts, the Trump Campaign's direct connection with Russian agents would be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. So it's no surprise at all that Roger Stone was such a cocky SOB before -- and after -- being charged and convicted by the government of a crime that would have put him behind bars for the rest of his life.

He knew all along he'd never see jail time.

I'm not ignoring it and I certainly don't like it. I'm just trying to figure out why you think that white house leakers are totally OK now even if it undermines national security. Should Bolton be charged with breaching his NDA in the same way that Snowden should be?

 

[DaShuckster]

Should Bolton be charged with breaching his NDA in the same way that Snowden should be?

What top-secret information did Bolton reveal? Everybody already knew Trump was a batshit crazy narcissist.