ADVERTISEMENT

Russia bombing US "allies" in Syria

In the President's defense, like the Ukraine, W. was powerless to stop them in Georgia as well.

Heck, when W. tried to just deliver aid to Georgians via disarmed Coast Guard cutters, even though he removed the required US Navy vessels to be "under the limit" for total NATO vessels on the Black Sea (per '90s agreements), the US left-wing media cruxified him and said he was "trying to start a war."

Russia successfully "probed" how the US would react when they went into Georgia. They previously "probed" the US on general air defense as early as the late '90s during Clinton. Russia knows the US won't deploy anything, won't do anything, in Europe, Syria or Iran to challenge them.

Until Russia actually starts killing US service men and women on the ground, we won't do anything.

Hence why Russia spends enormous amounts of money trying to covertly convince not just eastern, but even central European nations, to not deploy US sensory capabilities (labeled "missile defense" for political reasons), because that would include American servicemen and women on the ground. The BIS (acronym translated, [Czech Republic] Security Intelligence Service) regularly, and publicly, posts these expenditures by the Russians.

I.e., like the Nazis before them, the Russians consider the Czech Republic to be their biggest threat, and expend massive money on sociological efforts to undermine US positions there.
 
Putin is the most bold bullshitter I've seen in quite some time.

Says he's going to "battle ISIS", but bombs rebels instead, just as the entire world expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
Putin is the most bold bullshitter I've seen in quite some time.
Says he's going to "battle ISIS", but bombs rebels instead, just as the entire world expected.
Why should Putin change?
The US media gives him all the passes.

E.g.,

US tries to deploy THAAD for terminal (not strategic, much less national), battlefield air defense of US troops in South Korea, Poland and Czech Republic.

US Media: "The US is causing an imbalance which could lead to a new, nuclear arms race. Russia and China are demanding THAAD be removed from Europe and Asia, and PAC-3 deployments be limited."

Russia sells five (5) full installations of 300X and Iran is interested in 400 as well, with the Russians eager to sell it to them too.

US Media: "It's just a defensive system, and has no offensive capability. Why the Joint Chiefs of the Obama administration are troubled by the installation, we don't understand."
The sensory capabilities of Russia's 300X system is on-par with the '90s THAAD design, and completely oblierates the limited capabilities (in both direction and range) of PAC-3. Heck, the Clinton administration developed THAAD exactly for protecting US troops in South Korea.

The 300X/400 also utterly denies airspace penetration, meaning if we ever need to bomb, we're (US, Israel, even Saudia Arabia who has been bellyaching about this more than us!) going to lose a lot of aircraft.
 
Putin bad US good - only we can dickaround in the middle east. We're the only world policemen

All of our "enemies" are the ones without puppet central banks, some coincidence
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob the Citronaut
Putin bad US good - only we can dickaround in the middle east. We're the only world policemen

All of our "enemies" are the ones without puppet central banks, some coincidence

Great response. Thousands more will now die in Syria thanks to this, but hey let's throw around snide Ron Paul-esque remarks.
 
Great response. Thousands more will now die in Syria thanks to this, but hey let's throw around snide Ron Paul-esque remarks.
Even Ron Paul doesn't go that far.

I'm all for pulling out of Europe, Asia and the Middle East. But we should still maintain sensory capability and support certain goals in regions.
 
12049172_10153234396755197_1386280836362043034_n.jpg
 
And how well did worrying about pissing off the Russians work for LBJ in Vietnam?

Either pull out completely, like Ron Paul suggests, or tell the Russians the second an US advisor or Green Berret dies, they can expect their planes to be shot down.

I.e., the Russians are in violation of the terms of their involvement.

Either you enforce it or pull out completely. I'm all for being an isolationalist nation if we're no longer going to challenge the Russians to abide by their agreements with Georgia, Ukraine, UN when we signed agreements.

I'm glad we're worried about pissing off nuclear armed nations. Iran certainly took note.
 
Dicking around in the Middle East not working? Solution more dicking around in the Middle East. See also fed interest rate policy.
 
Dicking around in the Middle East not working? Solution more dicking around in the Middle East. See also fed interest rate policy.

Of course you somehow equate Middle East foreign policy to the evils of the Federal Reserve. Wouldn't be a Ron Paul Bot comment without it!
 
Obama is tough, he will tell Putin to ease up until after the election, and then he will give him what ever he wants.
 
Mother Russia now launching cruise missiles into Syria.

weird World we're living in when they are now doing the muscle flexing w inferior air power
 
I guess now Russia is good and Putin is our best friend

No one has ever said that. Russia is an enemy of the US, they've always been. They weren't when Killary tried to normalize relations with them though or four years ago when Obama laughed them off and called Romney out of touch. Or when 30 Dems met with Russians to get the Iran deal done. They certainly weren't a threat in October when Obama did nothing about their propaganda campaign. They became the greatest evil to ever walk the planet after Hillary lost though. The mental gymnastics of liberals are quite hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
I'll say it. There's only 1 (((people))) who love war so much they throw another group of people to go die in them whilst enjoying profiteering from them. Read the Talmud, goys.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT