Russia is in for the MAGA again!

[firm_bizzle]

Helping in both the Dem primary and general! Trump wins again! #winning


https://thehill.com/policy/national...-house-lawmakers-russia-is-interfering-to-get

 

[Sir Galahad]

Helping in both the Dem primary and general! Trump wins again! #winning


https://thehill.com/policy/national...-house-lawmakers-russia-is-interfering-to-get

I guess liberals now have their excuses for the 2020 election. But I’d like to know why this is news? The Russians know the liberals are whiney little bitches and will cause further splits within the American population.
Maybe the Russians are just following the Democrats lead when the Obama administration uses tax payer money to interfere in the Israeli elections.

 

[hemightbejeremy]

In before someone mentions libtards and Obama.

 

[firm_bizzle]

In before someone mentions libtards and Obama.

9 minutes late.

Why can't we ever come together as a country and fight against those on the outside trying to harm us? It always has to turn into a right vs left thing.

 

[UCFKnight85]

9 minutes late.

Why can't we ever come together as a country and fight against those on the outside trying to harm us? It always has to turn into a right vs left thing.

Your original post is flaming partisan garbage so don’t cry when you get the same in return.

 

[firm_bizzle]

Your original post is flaming partisan garbage so don’t cry when you get the same in return.

Shitty view that you have if you believe that American Intel professionals are "flaming partisan garbage". These people are doing their job in order to give us the best info, regardless of whether that info lines up with our political views.

 

[UCFKnight85]

Shitty view that you have if you believe that American Intel professionals are "flaming partisan garbage". These people are doing their job in order to give us the best info, regardless of whether that info lines up with our political views.

I was referring to your “Trump wins again!” Nonsense. Smh

 

[Crazyhole]

I see this being reported everywhere but nobody says what Russia is actually doing.

 

[firm_bizzle]

I see this being reported everywhere but nobody says what Russia is actually doing.

Classified.

 

[Sir Galahad]

Shitty view that you have if you believe that American Intel professionals are "flaming partisan garbage". These people are doing their job in order to give us the best info, regardless of whether that info lines up with our political views.

No flaming, just wondering why this is news. They have been doing this for decades, just like the U.S.

 

[Crazyhole]

Classified.

If they dont tell us what Russia is doing, how can we know what to look out for?

 

[UCFWayne]

we could start by requiring an id card to vote.

 

[Crazyhole]

we could start by requiring an id card to vote.

Racist

 

[firm_bizzle]

If they dont tell us what Russia is doing, how can we know what to look out for?

If they tell you then they can't fight it because Russia will change tactics.

 

[UCFWayne]

Racist

minorities arent smart enough to get id cards. - dems

 

[Crazyhole]

If they tell you then they can't fight it because Russia will change tactics.

I hope you're being sarcastic.

 

[firm_bizzle]

I hope you're being sarcastic.

That's why it's classified, so we can hide our counterattack.

 

[UCFWayne]

the 1980s want their foreign policy back

 

[Crazyhole]

That's why it's classified, so we can hide our counterattack.

This sounds like a long term ploy to be able to say after the fact that the election was invalid.

 

[firm_bizzle]

This sounds like a long term ploy to be able to say after the fact that the election was invalid.

That will happen regardless.

 

[KNIGHTTIME^]

Not requiring IDs is more of a fraud issue vs Russia that didn't change a vote.

 

[Crazyhole]

That will happen regardless.

What do you think they are doing? Seems unlikely the DNC would subject themselves to being hacked again. Facebook is taking measures against them. I wonder what new tactics are being used

 

[hemightbejeremy]

This sounds like a long term ploy to be able to say after the fact that the election was invalid.

 

[sk8knight]

View embedded media

Because the Democrats have such a good track record with accepting defeat like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and Stacy Abrams.

 

[UCFWayne]

Because the Democrats have such a good track record with accepting defeat like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and Stacy Abrams.

did stacy abrams ever admit defeat? is she still fighting it?

 

[sk8knight]

What do you think they are doing? Seems unlikely the DNC would subject themselves to being hacked again. Facebook is taking measures against them. I wonder what new tactics are being used

I really want to know where the Russian money is going as far as campaign and PAC funding. Beyond that, how about the Russian money that is intertwined with our media conglomerates, especially Hollywood movie studios. How much money funds the activist groups that brought the celebrities out of their bubble and into our political discourse? Not to mention movements like BDS, antifa, etc. I guess for fairness sake, we can throw in Focus on the Family, the NRA, etc.

 

[Cubs79]

Because the Democrats have such a good track record with accepting defeat like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and Stacy Abrams.

How did Hillary not accept defeat?

And the Gore and Abram situations are not normal situations.

 

[Crazyhole]

I really want to know where the Russian money is going as far as campaign and PAC funding. Beyond that, how about the Russian money that is intertwined with our media conglomerates, especially Hollywood movie studios. How much money funds the activist groups that brought the celebrities out of their bubble and into our political discourse? Not to mention movements like BDS, antifa, etc. I guess for fairness sake, we can throw in Focus on the Family, the NRA, etc.

I guess I dont care much about that kind of stuff. If russia wants to spend money on trying to make cultural or societal changes in the US, go for it.

 

[hemightbejeremy]

Because the Democrats have such a good track record with accepting defeat like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and Stacy Abrams.

Yeah. Democrats suck too.

 

[Crazyhole]

How did Hillary not accept defeat?

And the Gore and Abram situations are not normal situations.

Hillary did, it was the democrat party in general that didn't. Gore took it to the supreme court, which was legit but it also led to "selected not elected". Abrams is still claiming that the election was stolen so that's on her.

 

[sk8knight]

How did Hillary not accept defeat?

And the Gore and Abram situations are not normal situations.

Hillary has continually questioned the integrity of the election and has stated publicly more than once that she believes the election was stolen.

 

[Cubs79]

Hillary did, it was the democrat party in general that didn't. Gore took it to the supreme court, which was legit but it also led to "selected not elected". Abrams is still claiming that the election was stolen so that's on her.

How did the Democratic party not accept it?

The Bush/Gore election was vastly different than most other elections, and you know that, nobody in their right mind would have conceded without going to court first.

And the Abram's race was also unique in that her opponent was also the one running the election. That would be like a head coach of a team in the super bowl also being the head referee, it doesn't look great and people would have questions.

 

[Cubs79]

Hillary has continually questioned the integrity of the election and has stated publicly more than once that she believes the election was stolen.

So what, she hasn't challenged anything. Trump has also challenged the integrity of the election and claimed voter fraud, so you should call him out for not accepting the results too then.

 

[Crazyhole]

How did the Democratic party not accept it?

The Bush/Gore election was vastly different than most other elections, and you know that, nobody in their right mind would have conceded without going to court first.

And the Abram's race was also unique in that her opponent was also the one running the election. That would be like a head coach of a team in the super bowl also being the head referee, it doesn't look great and people would have questions.

Do you believe that the problem with 2016 was russian intervention and the electoral college? Because it seems like that is the party line.

 

[Cubs79]

Do you believe that the problem with 2016 was russian intervention and the electoral college? Because it seems like that is the party line.

But those things aren't denying defeat. Hillary conceded the day after the election and it was never challenged in court, so you cant say they didn't accept defeat. The EC is a policy issue and there is nothing unreasonable in debating the merits of it. I do think Russia played some part, though probably impossible to know how much.

 

[Crazyhole]

But those things aren't denying defeat. Hillary conceded the day after the election and it was never challenged in court, so you cant say they didn't accept defeat. The EC is a policy issue and there is nothing unreasonable in debating the merits of it. I do think Russia played some part, though probably impossible to know how much.

I said she didnt deny defeat. The party in general then decided that the system needed to be changed because they didnt like the fact that she lost. There are merits to the argument of changing the system but it's based on not liking the outcome, not because the system is flawed.

Do you think hillary should be president right now? Please answer without caveats

 

[Cubs79]

I said she didnt deny defeat. The party in general then decided that the system needed to be changed because they didnt like the fact that she lost. There are merits to the argument of changing the system but it's based on not liking the outcome, not because the system is flawed.

Do you think hillary should be president right now? Please answer without caveats

I would disagree that the system isn't flawed, but that's just opinion on either side.

I never said that Hillary should be president right now, so not sure why you are asking me to answer that without caveats, when I have never even made that claim period.

 

[hemightbejeremy]

Guys the Trump vs Hillary election is akin to a Middle Tennessee vs North Texas game. You can pick a side and be happy you “won”, but still admit that both teams are objectively terrible. Both candidates were corrupt. And morally bankrupt. It turns out Trump also has no problem bending and breaking laws. It’s possible to hold leaders accountable and still score the election result in your personal win column.

 

[Crazyhole]

I would disagree that the system isn't flawed, but that's just opinion on either side.

I never said that Hillary should be president right now, so not sure why you are asking me to answer that without caveats, when I have never even made that claim period.

So the system is flawed. Under your system who would currently be president and does that opinion have anything to do with you wishing that hillary would be president instead of trump?

 

[firm_bizzle]

Can I please just get a competent person who hires and listens to other competent people? This feels like the twilight zone.