What’s with calling people pedophile ? Is that a QUAnon thing? Weird, Seriously
Sounds like Trump and Cruz made it clear they didn't want Garland confirmed.I don’t understand why people would be mad at Trump if he nominates someone. That's his job.
I can see why they would be mad at McConnell.
Trump creates electoral problems for a few senators if he nominated someone.I don’t understand why people would be mad at Trump if he nominates someone. That's his job.
I can see why they would be mad at McConnell.
That was years ago. He might lose his Trump base.Lindsey Graham repeatedly insisted that Supreme Court vacancies shouldn't be filled in election years
South Carolina senator has repeatedly promised not to take up Supreme Court nominees in a president’s last year, including since Donald Trump became presidentwww.independent.co.uk
And if it happens, just wait. The new Congress will expand the size of the SCOTUS. Count on it.I don’t get the issue. Politicians being hypocritical? Why is this surprising?
Politics is all about seizing opportunity and republicans have the chance to push someone through with a potential lane duck Congress and president. Sorries dems the rules
I don’t get the issue. Politicians being hypocritical? Why is this surprising?
Politics is all about seizing opportunity and republicans have the chance to push someone through with a potential lane duck Congress and president. Sorries dems the rules
Hypocrite:And this is a perfect example of how every single half way intelligent person, like myself, has left the GOP.
You seriously don't see the problem with your political representatives being hypocrites? Holy shit. You are part of the problem with why our country has gone down hill.
I think you got 2016 wrong.Hypocrite:
2016: THE SENATE MUST VOTE ON THIS SCOTUS NOMINEE NOW!
2020: THE SENATE MUST NOT VOTE ON THIS SCOTUS NOMINEE NOW!
With a president that got 46% of the vote and a senate that represents 44% of the country. Minority rule, nah I'm out.I don’t get the issue. Politicians being hypocritical? Why is this surprising?
Politics is all about seizing opportunity and republicans have the chance to push someone through with a potential lane duck Congress and president. Sorries dems the rules
No it’s where the crime is the highestIz da blu wher dem peepolls liv?
Land doesn't vote dumb ass.“minority”
Another brilliant observation! Crime is higher where people live!No it’s where the crime is the highest
As someone who identifies with the party that freed the slaves, I don’t appreciate you making a mockery of black Ebonics with your language either
Land doesn't vote dumb ass.
Violent crime is higher in areas that have higher population density. Part of that is due to balkanization of races in those areas, part of it is due to people having too much interaction with others. Its not exactly a revelation to say that people in high population density areas are more stressed than those that live in areas where interaction is a byproduct of life and not a necessary part of it. Part of the human condition is needing to interact with others and another part of it is just wanting to be left alone. Its hard to accomplish that in highly dense population centersAnother brilliant observation! Crime is higher where people live!
You do understand that the minority the previous poster mentioned was in American citizens right? Not land area.No it’s where the crime is the highest
As someone who identifies with the party that freed the slaves, I don’t appreciate you making a mockery of black Ebonics with your language either
Murders also occur where people are. By joe I think they are getting it.Democratic areas are murder zones. Poorly run cities.
You do understand that the minority the previous poster mentioned was in American citizens right? Not land area.
I mean it’s great that the Republican Party can command vast areas with minimal population, but that doesn’t add up to a majority no matter how many maps you post bokay pedophile.
I mean it’s great that the Republican Party can command vast areas with minimal population, but that doesn’t add up to a majority no matter how many maps you post b
I didn’t ask a question. Was just instructing you. Yes I’m sure 2 million people voted illegally in 2016. And all of them for Clinton. Reality check a thousand voted illegally and most were for Trump.nope, if you remove the illegal votes he won the majority easily.
Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections?
In spite of substantial public controversy, very little reliable data exists concerning the frequency with which non-citizen immigrants participate in…www.sciencedirect.com
But none of this is surprising because THE MAJORITY of yall support illegal voting
Democrats Want Illegals To Vote Because They Vote Democrat
Immigration: Some 53% of Democrats want illegal aliens to have the vote, according to a new poll. Naturally: Why wouldn't they want millions of new members for their party and... Read Morewww.investors.com
any more stupid questions? don't wanna keep you from your nightly "Cuties" session
Basically all cities in the US have Democrat mayors. I noticed 8 of the top 9 cities in your list are in red states.Murder map: Deadliest U.S. cities
You might be surprised by the murder rates in major cities across the U.S.www.google.com
Murder map: Deadliest U.S. cities
You might be surprised by the murder rates in major cities across the U.S.www.google.com
Democrat run cities. Stay with me. You can have a sh!thole in the middle of a nice state.
There were almost 70 cities on your list dude, naming one doesnt change my point.Thank goodness not 100% were democratic run cities. Detroit for the record vote 98% democratic in 2012. Lol
There is more at play in contributing to crime rates than what political party the local mayor has by their name. Mainly how state welfare programs and unemployment programs are implemented as these are major drivers for poverty rates which in turn influence crime rates. Just throwing your hands up and blaming democrats for the worst cities ignores that the vast majority of all larger cities (with good and bad crime rates) have Democrat leadership.Democrat run cities. Stay with me. You can have a sh!thole in the middle of a nice state.
So defection of blame. Never the fault of the leaders of the community.
There is more at play in contributing to crime rates than what political party the local mayor has by their name. Mainly how state welfare programs and unemployment programs are implemented as these are major drivers for poverty rates which in turn influence crime rates. Just throwing your hands up and blaming democrats for the worst cities ignores that the vast majority of all larger cities (with good and bad crime rates) have Democrat leadership.
It's also funny they blame Democratic cities for any failures, but they never praise them for their successes. In TN, Nashville and Memphis, the only 2 Dem strongholds, account for about 50% of the state tax revenue. IN other words, the 2 blue cities basically fund the programs for the rest of the state. Weird how they never mention that.
Red counties are just snowflake filled leaches, sucking from the productivity of blue counties. Blue controlled counties produce exponentially more GDP in every measurable metric compared to backwards inbred red counties.
It is just an uninformed argument. Yes there are blue cities that have issues, I dont think anyone denies that, but they try to trot out that all cities are shitholes and small Republican towns are some sort of little paradises, which is ridiculous. I promise them there are hell hole little Republican towns all over this country.