Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or it was a rejection of Clinton.I think it's time to question if the Unemployment rate and his 55% approval rating is b.s.
This was a massive rejection of Liberalism
Or it was a rejection of Clinton.
Votes on gun control, marijuana, and minimum wage were what exactly?It was a rejection of Barry and his liberal policies which have wrecked the economy. Barry said last week that a vote for Trump was a personal insult to him. Welll........
Well, she did get the most votes.
Although it's anecdotal, every Democrat I've talked to has been boastfully proud of Obama's presidency. I think this chart illustrates the Undecided voters are not happy with the direction things are going and are voting against the party in power. Not to mention voter turnout from Democrats has not been as good.
Well, she did get the most votes.
If any president elect ever had a mandate, it's Trump. So many folks underestimated him and his message.
Obama had a mandate in 2008 with his huge win over McCain and the sweeping victory in Congress; I guess you could argue Trump has the same since he won and the GOP owns both Houses. To be honest, I'm not sure margin of victory really matters for it to be considered a mandate.How is it a mandate when you got the 2nd most votes?
It doesn't, take out NYC and the vote totals flip. People here live in a different world than most. I laugh at people when they say Clinton won the popular vote, of course she did, people in NYC think everyone should be like them and live like them.Obama had a mandate in 2008 with his huge win over McCain and the sweeping victory in Congress; I guess you could argue Trump has the same since he won and the GOP owns both Houses. To be honest, I'm not sure margin of victory really matters for it to be considered a mandate.
Obama had a mandate in 2008 with his huge win over McCain and the sweeping victory in Congress; I guess you could argue Trump has the same since he won and the GOP owns both Houses. To be honest, I'm not sure margin of victory really matters for it to be considered a mandate.
It doesn't, take out NYC and the vote totals flip. People here live in a different world than most. I laugh at people when they say Clinton won the popular vote, of course she did, people in NYC think everyone should be like them and live like them.
It doesn't, take out NYC and the vote totals flip. People here live in a different world than most. I laugh at people when they say Clinton won the popular vote, of course she did, people in NYC think everyone should be like them and live like them.
if we went strictly on popular vote then California would decide every future election whose Politics have gone so far left compared to the rest of the countryYou act like the popular vote doesn't matter. You must have people vote for you in order to win electoral votes. It's the only way it happens.
Now it's dictated by Wyoming, the Dakotas, and Montana like states. One vote there means more (up to 4x) than in states like California and New York. That's not fair either.We can't go to a popular vote in this country. Most of us would lose our voice and everything would be dictated from ivory towers in NY, California, Chicago, DC.
if we went strictly on popular vote then California would decide every future election whose Politics have gone so far left compared to the rest of the country
Now it's dictated by Wyoming, the Dakotas, and Montana like states. One vote there means more (up to 4x) than in states like California and New York. That's not fair either.
And Electoral votes change over time as Representation in the House changes in accordance with the latest Census. The system isn't meant to change quickly, but 388 out of 538 Electoral votes could theoretically come from one state. Right now 80% of the electoral votes come from a population based metric, that's fair in my eyes.Then that is what the country is. The Electoral College is like a voter exchange. Each person votes and depending on your address will determine the exchange rate for your vote. In CA there are ~164,000 voters per electoral vote. In Wyoming, there are ~83,000 voters per electoral vote. So people in Wyoming count twice as much as the people in CA.
Another reason to make a proportional electoral college, gets more states involved.It's dictated by the swing states, not the Wyomings of the country. The swing states are all really good representations of the country as a whole, that's why they're swing states.
I know you are trolling, I'll take the bait. Not sure where you got that from or that it is outrageous that 2 Americans have equal vote representation.firm_bizzle thinks mob rule is cool and favors suppression of minority views.