The Minority Report the NY Times Didn't Bother to Cover

[UCFBS]

I never voted Trump, and I 100% agree with Rand Paul that once the Electoral College met in mid-December, it was wrong to oppose the results. That said ...

We're at the point that papers are utterly partisan. I heard about the Minority Report that the NY Times not only didn't bother to cover, but failed to point out that the alleged 'bi-partisan' report is actually the Democratic report. The Washington Times, who is right-leaning, but not wrong, says it best ...

'But the report is in fact from Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Republicans were part of the investigation, too — they participated in the same interviews and reviewed the same documents — and they came away with such a different impression of events that they released their own report (which somehow did not find its way into the New York Times).'​

Article:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-memo-the-other-side-of-that-trump-doj-report

Raw Report:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/im...s_from_december_14_2020_to_january_3_2021.pdf

 

[DaShuckster]

I never voted Trump, and I 100% agree with Rand Paul that once the Electoral College met in mid-December, it was wrong to oppose the results.

Here comes the "BUT..."

That said ...

Close enough.

We're at the point that papers are utterly partisan.

Newspapers are partisan??!? Perish the thought!!!!

I heard about the Minority Report

It was a Minority Report for a reason.

 

[goodknightfl]

Here comes the "BUT..."

Close enough.

Newspapers are partisan??!? Perish the thought!!!!

It was a Minority Report for a reason. [b/]

Yep, because in a 50 50 split senate the VP gets the tie breaking vote.