But you're fopr SARS-CoV-2 mandates ... even though it never reduced spread ... ever?I don't support mandatory vaccines for the flu so I have no idea what you're talking about
That's the only argument for any mandatory vaccines, but apparently ... we have to have the state save us from ourselves, even though no intramuscular, IgG (blood) predominant does anything for the upper respiratory tract, and that's always been the case, and is well known.
Anyone who said otherwise lied, and even lied to US Congress has much video of various executives, even CDC head Walensky (although Biden did ask for her resignation for withholding negative data on boosters). In Europe, there have been fines over lying to government officials.
But here in the US, we have inverse fines, whereby if you are harmed by mandates, you have the bonus of having lost your medical coverage, and ... having at least a temporary, if not permanent, medical burden. But ... they allegedly don't exist, right? No one was harmed, right?
This is what no accountability looks like. Even if you believe mandates saved people, you have to still cover those who were harmed. But we not only don't, but we discriminate against people.
As I said from the get-go, this is HIV/AIDS all over again. Even those who obtained it from a blood transfusion were discriminated against, and couldn't receive treatment.