ADVERTISEMENT

Trump's 2020 chances '100 percent dead' after 4 swing state lawsuits are dropped

ElprofesorJuan

Five-Star Recruit
Sep 4, 2019
961
452
63

It may be too late. No way to come back.
 
Cause Hunter can't rake it in like before ?
Why not? It's already been well proven that no one will look into their actions. I would think they'd be more profitable than ever with the Big Guy being POTUS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THX_UCF2

It may be too late. No way to come back.

Things that are 100% not true and legit typically are tossed out. Only stupid losers who cling to false hope, conspiracy theories, and Hannity/Limbaugh buy into this dumb nonsense.

In memoriam, Crazyhole, Glaciers, and Dr. Knighttime.
 
Because conceding means completely abandoning all efforts. Biden won, there is no question about that now. What's left is an exercise in constitutionality, which is a good thing.
It's admirable that Trump is making this meaningless court challenge as an exercise in constitutionality. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
I want to hear what his lawyers say. He has Lin Wood and Sidney Powell saying they are going to change the world and reverse everything. These are high profile lawyers that have been saying stuff that is so crazy it must be true or else they are ruining their reputations for nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Ignore them. Let them yell about a stolen election to each other in their safe space, parler.

Goddamn snowflakes are too triggered to even use regular social media.

Behold, all in one comment the mighty NinjaKnight both advocated for ignoring people you disagree with, while simultaneously making fun of others for ignoring people they disagree with.
 
An unlawful defeat? Geez, that was a quick turnaround!!!

What happened to recognizing the outcome but feeling the need to clarify Pennsylvania law? :)
The SCOTUS case is not about pennsylvania law it's about the Constitution. The Constitution arts forth that state legislatures are solely responsible for election law and the time and manner in which they take place . The constitution further states elections for federal representatives need to be on the same day with the polls opening and closing at the same time.

The issue in Pennsylvania is this. The PA Supreme Court changed election law in PA by changing the time and date in which ballots would be accepted . They did two things. one, they are not authorized even under this Covid bull crap to change election law. It's crystal damn clear in the US Constitution who has some authority . it's not the governor or the courts . The other they did in PA was change the time in effect in which polls would close because they would accept ballots even with post marks 3 days after the polls closed . in essence they changed the time and manner . the constitution calls for uniformity in our elections.

Had the PA legislature made some of these changes it is in their duty to do so.

There are Constitutional issues here that are bigger than biden or Trump. THe PA case needs to be heard. we can't have judges and judicial decrees handed down as legislation. it's not their damn job to write law. it's their job to apply it. in the case of a federal election. they have no job at all.

in article 4 section 4 of the Constitution it states the staters will have a republican form of government with executive, legislative and judicial branches. they are to follow their state Constitution and the us one too. it's my opinion as a student of history that the PA Courts acting the way they did also violates article 4 because the court stepped on the role of the state legislature. I could be wrong.

I think our Republic is in danger due to how this election is conducted. I don't trust the results. their are events which statistically don't add up at all. The data doesn't follow patterns . in Philly Biden getting 100% of these votes while Trump gets 0? that doesn't happen. The mockery of poll workers kicking out partisan observers is behavior of people wanting to do sketchy things. Taping up windows and on and on...what are you hiding? it's not transparent at all.

France outlawed mail in voting due to the fraud potential is huge. We should do the same if we want to have a representative Republic where all of us trust our elections. if we lose trust in the elections we lose faith in the bedrock of our nation. it's that simple. The left can say whatever but know this half the electorate distrusts the results . you need all of the electorate to say yep, thus person won ,this won lost and we all agree and all trust it.

All of this why the SCOTUS needs to hear the case. Either the rule of law and the Constitution matters or it doesn't . I believe it does.
 
The SCOTUS case is not about pennsylvania law it's about the Constitution. The Constitution arts forth that state legislatures are solely responsible for election law and the time and manner in which they take place . The constitution further states elections for federal representatives need to be on the same day with the polls opening and closing at the same time.

The issue in Pennsylvania is this. The PA Supreme Court changed election law in PA by changing the time and date in which ballots would be accepted . They did two things. one, they are not authorized even under this Covid bull crap to change election law. It's crystal damn clear in the US Constitution who has some authority . it's not the governor or the courts . The other they did in PA was change the time in effect in which polls would close because they would accept ballots even with post marks 3 days after the polls closed . in essence they changed the time and manner . the constitution calls for uniformity in our elections.

Had the PA legislature made some of these changes it is in their duty to do so.

There are Constitutional issues here that are bigger than biden or Trump. THe PA case needs to be heard. we can't have judges and judicial decrees handed down as legislation. it's not their damn job to write law. it's their job to apply it. in the case of a federal election. they have no job at all.

in article 4 section 4 of the Constitution it states the staters will have a republican form of government with executive, legislative and judicial branches. they are to follow their state Constitution and the us one too. it's my opinion as a student of history that the PA Courts acting the way they did also violates article 4 because the court stepped on the role of the state legislature. I could be wrong.

I think our Republic is in danger due to how this election is conducted. I don't trust the results. their are events which statistically don't add up at all. The data doesn't follow patterns . in Philly Biden getting 100% of these votes while Trump gets 0? that doesn't happen. The mockery of poll workers kicking out partisan observers is behavior of people wanting to do sketchy things. Taping up windows and on and on...what are you hiding? it's not transparent at all.

France outlawed mail in voting due to the fraud potential is huge. We should do the same if we want to have a representative Republic where all of us trust our elections. if we lose trust in the elections we lose faith in the bedrock of our nation. it's that simple. The left can say whatever but know this half the electorate distrusts the results . you need all of the electorate to say yep, thus person won ,this won lost and we all agree and all trust it.

All of this why the SCOTUS needs to hear the case. Either the rule of law and the Constitution matters or it doesn't . I believe it does.
There were a even number of Republicans and Democrats allowed in the Counting Area Also Video Recording while ballots were being counted. they taped pizza boxes to windows because peiple were gatheting outside which may disrupt the counting. As of now 5 frivolous law suits have been defeated.2 Law firms have quit citing insufficient evidence. Your claims have no evidence and can be countered easily. As i can see you are buying the Mumbo Jumbo of Trumps Attorney's. Trump Witness for tampering has also walked back his story. Nothing can be proven. Trumps own head of overseeing Election Fraud said himself it was a clean Election. Not sufficient Fraud to cause a over turn of the Election. All elections have irregularities that can be explained if you look at counties voting history...
 
I think our Republic is in danger due to how this election is conducted. I don't trust the results. their are events which statistically don't add up at all. The data doesn't follow patterns . in Philly Biden getting 100% of these votes while Trump gets 0? that doesn't happen. The mockery of poll workers kicking out partisan observers is behavior of people wanting to do sketchy things. Taping up windows and on and on...what are you hiding? it's not transparent at all.

What I think is fascinating - you and I both think the Republic is in legitimate danger, but for completely different reasons. I'm curious if we peel the onion back a layer or two if we can agree on one thing - The biggest "threat" is internal division. There will always be blips - but the only way we fail to uphold our core values over the long term is if we fight a Civil Cold War of escalating norm-breaking. Once you've convinced yourself the other guy will do anything to win, you become more convinced it's necessary to take equally unethical, anti-democratic, or illegal steps to stop them.

From your perspective, if you believe significant evidence exists that the election was stolen from Trump, then it's easy to support an effort to reverse the results via state legislatures stepping in to make things right.

Conversely, if I do not believe that same evidence exists or is valid, then I see that legal effort as an un-democratic attempt at a soft-coup, weaponizing disinformation to create public pressure to over-turn a valid result.

Only one can be right, but the damage is asymmetric. There's been PLENTY of fraudulent elections in our history. Plenty of big-city political machines that rigged local elections. Plenty of small-town ballot stuffing. Kennedy may have only won the Presidency thanks to fraud in Chicago.

Yet despite all that history, we move on. We harden election security. Improve transparency. Investigate and send people to jail. Democracy can *easily* survive fraud and move on.

It is much harder to survive a false narrative of "fraud" that overturns a result. Why? Trust. Republicans will have zero trust in the system since apparently the Democrats can rig elections at the national level. Democrats will have no trust in the system, because Republicans will be willing to overturn elections by raw power, without facts or courts on their side. Constitutional safeguards will be meaningless, and a race to the bottom becomes inevitable.

Trump conceding was (and is) the right thing to do if you *truly* believe in the long term project of self government. It's like the Churchill line "Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried."

Weaponizing the weak points in democratic-elections is the stuff of demagogues and wannabe tyrants. Not a single democratic election has ever existed, nor will one ever exist, where the loser can't blame his loss on fraud. Trump blamed his 2016 Iowa loss to Cruz on fraud. He blamed his popular vote loss in 2016 on fraud. He told us - in advance - that if he loses, it will be because of fraud.

Call a duck a duck.
 
I want to hear what his lawyers say. He has Lin Wood and Sidney Powell saying they are going to change the world and reverse everything. These are high profile lawyers that have been saying stuff that is so crazy it must be true or else they are ruining their reputations for nothing.

But we can't forget the voice of reason, the light in the darkness, Rudy!
 
I don't trust the results. their are events which statistically don't add up at all. The data doesn't follow patterns . in Philly Biden getting 100% of these votes while Trump gets 0? that doesn't happen.
Let me get this straight: It's hard for you to believe that Joe Biden got a very high percentage of the mail-in vote in Philly?

You do recall that Trump SLAMMED mail-in voting and said people should vote in person, right? But somehow, a high percentage of Republican votes on election day and a high percentage of Democrats voting by mail "doesn't add up"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Why not? It's already been well proven that no one will look into their actions. I would think they'd be more profitable than ever with the Big Guy being POTUS.
Has to be official, before he can start misusing his position. He should be able to get even more Biden family members make believe jobs making millions with even more set aside for the Big guy.
Do Republicans have any clue how stupid these stunts make them look?
Did Dems with Gore? That went on longer that this has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
I want to hear what his lawyers say. He has Lin Wood and Sidney Powell saying they are going to change the world and reverse everything. These are high profile lawyers that have been saying stuff that is so crazy it must be true or else they are ruining their reputations for nothing.



It does seem odd he would say something like this if there's nothing to back it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Has to be official, before he can start misusing his position. He should be able to get even more Biden family members make believe jobs making millions with even more set aside for the Big guy.

Did Dems with Gore? That went on longer that this has.


Shut.

The fuk

Up.

Holy shit you are the biggest goddamn moron in a board filled with inbred cousin banging idiots. Everything you just posted is idiotic.

Trump's entire cabinet was filled with his absolutely unqualified children.

This election is in zero way similar to Gore vs Bush.

Jesus titty fuking christ you people are too stupid to be allowed to vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Has to be official, before he can start misusing his position. He should be able to get even more Biden family members make believe jobs making millions with even more set aside for the Big guy.
Proper recognition is due here. Congrats, goodknightfl. The complete lack of self-awareness to be found in this post is absolutely breathtaking. You're taking about JOE BIDEN, not Donald Trump, right?
 


It does seem odd he would say something like this if there's nothing to back it up.

Legit curious about this - not because it's nefarious but I'm wondering what the rules are. Assuming you have a functioning automatic counting system, the hand-recount process is subject to more error-sources than the machine counts. All of the questionable ballots the machine couldn't read were already hand-reviewed and assessed in the initial counts.

So if you're off by a handful of votes across tens-of-thousands, it could make sense that policy is to stick with the original machine counts. The bigger value here is like the one random county that found 2,500 votes it missed the first time.

He's not claiming massive differences in the numbers, just that the the machine counts take precedence. That could be totally true and yet totally meaningless at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Legit curious about this - not because it's nefarious but I'm wondering what the rules are. Assuming you have a functioning automatic counting system, the hand-recount process is subject to more error-sources than the machine counts. All of the questionable ballots the machine couldn't read were already hand-reviewed and assessed in the initial counts.

So if you're off by a handful of votes across tens-of-thousands, it could make sense that policy is to stick with the original machine counts. The bigger value here is like the one random county that found 2,500 votes it missed the first time.

He's not claiming massive differences in the numbers, just that the the machine counts take precedence. That could be totally true and yet totally meaningless at the same time.
My understanding of it is that their audit is testing whether small sample hand-recounts match the machine recounts.

What makes Lin Woods tweet interesting is the rhetoric. Like Happy Hands said, it seems weird that a high profile lawyer would risk their reputation by saying stuff like that.
 
Liberals in this thread:

Shut the fuk up

Dummy


Way to come together guys.
 
Legit curious about this - not because it's nefarious but I'm wondering what the rules are. Assuming you have a functioning automatic counting system, the hand-recount process is subject to more error-sources than the machine counts. All of the questionable ballots the machine couldn't read were already hand-reviewed and assessed in the initial counts.

So if you're off by a handful of votes across tens-of-thousands, it could make sense that policy is to stick with the original machine counts. The bigger value here is like the one random county that found 2,500 votes it missed the first time.

He's not claiming massive differences in the numbers, just that the the machine counts take precedence. That could be totally true and yet totally meaningless at the same time.
2600 1600 for Trump 1000 for biden..only 600 votes Trump gained....Not enough to overtake Biden 12,000 lead..It was human error Disk left in Machine and found there after
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT