The problem is people who talk about politics don't bother to read or understand the US Constitution - the Supreme Law of the Land.
It's unConstitutional to limit immigration.
Don't like it? Make an Constitutional amendment.
Did you even understand my point? I was not speaking as myself ... but as my colleagues who are legal immigrants!
I.e., the ones I feel should have been given Green Cards immediately!
Furthermore ...
Don't lecture a Libertarian on civics, especially the Constitution.
E.g., I'm not against "open borders."
But that requires three (3) things ...
1) Ending all subsidy of services, especially those based on fraud.
I.e., I have no problem with people who want to come here, work hard, and move on. Many Hispanic-Americans have that attitude, just like Irish-Americans did.
E.g., many Hispanic-Americans, who come here and pay into the system, and make our nation great. are tired of the services and subsidy afforded to those who do not work too.
Just like virtually all other western nations don't ... not even Canada and the EU. For some reason, it's not illegal to commit fraud in the US when it comes to taxpayer services.
2) I recommend you read 19th Century US history, let alone 20th. People have re-written it, but it's not the reality. The US has
never had 'open borders.' Yes, we have 'more open' than now, but please re-read your history.
3) We encourage those who have trades and skills. Right now, we're preferring two (2) types of immigrants ...
A) Citizenship for pay (legal, look it up -- the "already rich")
B) Undocumented (illegal, under both US and EU legal definition -- the "loss of $200B/year in revenue")
The Jane and Joe immigrant, who speak English, possible even married an American, cannot get Green Cards. In fact, we have a "C" ... which is a non-immigrant ...
C) Work Visa (instead of Green Card) -- over 60% abused by major corporations (95% of the type granted didn't even exist before 1990)
We make some of the US' brightest futures come through the Work Visa programs, and they are basically 'indentured servants."
We Libertarians are sick of it.
The IEEE-USA and other engineering associations are sick of it.
Many small businesses are sick of it.
Our immigration is really screwed up.
What the Trump policy does is cater to the people tired of having to come through "C", while those under "A" and "B" are currently preferred.
I can understand their logic, and it would be better for America -- regardless how I feel as a Libertarian. I have to understand they are correct.
In fact, if I was to change things, I do ...
Regarding "3B" -- A "pay per entry," which makes them "legal," but if they bypass the system, it's "fraud." Most Libertarians have pushed this as a way to document most current undocumented, as well as 'better track' the 'repatriation of dollars' (e.g., sending money to family overseas)
Regarding "3C" -- These people are given immediate Green Cards. It's time to stop preferring "3B" and "3A".
As far as "3A" -- I think they have to actually invest in a real business, employing Americans, and not the current loopholes. But that's another debate.
In any case, "3A" and "3B" should not be preferred over "3C". But that is the problem right now. I hope you can see that was my argument.
Equal opportunity ... not preferred opportunity for the rich and those who bypass law and commit fraud.