I’ll go first and to clarify this is just for fun. How would you structure revenue distribution if it were up to you?
This rewards top teams which likely have a better chance of bringing the league success if funded properly. We should well fund the top teams in our conference and help them compete with the big dogs. There would be a halo effect for our conference. Before everyone whines..every team has a fair shot at 1st place every year. This rewards performance with skin in the game to compete for top dollar (motivation). Also, it isn’t a feast or famine curve. All teams make more than they do today.
1. $15M
2. $13M
3. $11M
4. $10M
5. $8M
6. $8M
7. $8M
8. $6M
9. $6M
10. $6M
11. $6M
12. $6M
13. $5M
14. $5M
This rewards top teams which likely have a better chance of bringing the league success if funded properly. We should well fund the top teams in our conference and help them compete with the big dogs. There would be a halo effect for our conference. Before everyone whines..every team has a fair shot at 1st place every year. This rewards performance with skin in the game to compete for top dollar (motivation). Also, it isn’t a feast or famine curve. All teams make more than they do today.
1. $15M
2. $13M
3. $11M
4. $10M
5. $8M
6. $8M
7. $8M
8. $6M
9. $6M
10. $6M
11. $6M
12. $6M
13. $5M
14. $5M
Last edited:
