If you're talking about the judge's decision, I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Agreed. No, she's obviously not a flight risk but you don't allow anyone to leave the country if there are criminal charges against them.If you're talking about the judge's decision, I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Can you even imagine an American court allowing a Black or Muslim radical to leave the country??? I know, I know, that's different.
Imagine trying to claim the moral high ground when your cult stormed the US Capitol one month ago for crying out loud!!!!
Why not?
Where’s the request being denied for a black or Muslim person facing only misdemeanor charges? Or are you just imagining a scenario that doesn’t really exist?If you're talking about the judge's decision, I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Can you even imagine an American court allowing a Black or Muslim radical to leave the country??? I know, I know, that's different.
If it had been a group of Blacks or Muslims who did the exact, same thing as this yahoo and her friends, they sure has hell wouldn't have gotten 'slap-on-the-wrist,' misdemeanor charges.
The article says they may be upping the charges against her. If it's just a misdemeanor, let her go to cancun. I disagree with the judge on this because there is a chance that she will be charged with a felony. It seems like that should be enough to say she probably shouldn't leave the country for a little while.
This has no basis in reality, and is purely hypothetical conjecture. The sad thing is you let it dictate your view of the world.
No basis in reality? So you believe an arrest for storming the U.S. Capitol building was rightly a misdemeanor and not a felony?
So is your stupidity if you think people supported any of the inner-city race riots last summer. The vast majority of George Floyd protests were peaceful.
meanwhile yall are showing up with guns and shooting politicians:
www.breitbart.com
You can’t be serious... of course people supported the race riots last summer.
No you don't, if you're white and holding a MAGA sign. If you're a minority, it's a completely different story. The stark display of unequal justice on display last summer explains why some people like Kamala Harris were supporting the Freedom Fund.
Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. 🙄
What broken laws are being ignored? What law should these white people be charged with breaking that they would be charged with if they were black?
Are you opining with a straight face that if a group of BLM protesters stormed the Capitol, the aftermath would have been the same?
More of my "hypothetical bullshit."
www.trtworld.com
Keep ignoring the very clear question I’ve asked.More of my "hypothetical bullshit."
Day and night: The difference in US police response to BLM, Capitol riots
US police reaction to armed Trump supporters who stormed Capitol Hill presents a stark contradiction to their often forceful handling of unarmed Black Lives Matters demonstrators.
Does that article mention that police shot and killed a white woman inside the Capitol building? I missed it if so...More of my "hypothetical bullshit."
Day and night: The difference in US police response to BLM, Capitol riots
US police reaction to armed Trump supporters who stormed Capitol Hill presents a stark contradiction to their often forceful handling of unarmed Black Lives Matters demonstrators.
There are laws on the books against the destruction of government property, rioting or inciting to riot, conspiracy, burglary, assaulting a police officer, carrying a dangerous weapon, unlawful entry, prohibited entry into restricted grounds, seditious conspiracy, and insurrection.
Did she destroy property? What’s the evidence?There are laws on the books against the destruction of government property, rioting or inciting to riot, conspiracy, burglary, assaulting a police officer, carrying a dangerous weapon, unlawful entry, prohibited entry into restricted grounds, seditious conspiracy, and insurrection.
The woman highlighted in the OP was charged with disorderly conduct. By contrast, some of the BLM protesters across the country have been hit with punitive, felony charges for acts of civil disobedience, in what civil rights experts say is a “suppression tactic” aimed at quashing the anti-racism movement.
Felony charges against BLM protesters are 'suppression tactic', experts say
Civil rights groups say prosecutors are trying to quash anti-racism protests with excessive charges threatening long prison termswww.theguardian.com
dude, nobody agrees with you almost ever. quit talking like you're speaking to a group of your fans, most people here feel bad for you cuz you're clearly a bitter old codger.
Still wondering why that article omitted the fact that police shot and killed a white woman inside the building...More of my "hypothetical bullshit."
Day and night: The difference in US police response to BLM, Capitol riots
US police reaction to armed Trump supporters who stormed Capitol Hill presents a stark contradiction to their often forceful handling of unarmed Black Lives Matters demonstrators.
Yeah, it's not like a mob had just smashed a window in a effort to storm inside the Capitol and this Trump-loving 'patriot' was the first one to jump inside or anything. 🙄
I’m not complaining about her being shot. She deserved to be shot. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
you really crying about smashed windows after you said it was okay to burn down Target, Wendy's, Autozone, etc because they had insurance?
This had zero to do with the media coverage. I simply linked an article that spoke to my point.
Were any of the summer rioters held without bail for misdemeanor trespassing like the "Cowboys For Trump" guy?
And I’m pointing out that the linked article is biased garbage that’s cherry picking to be misleading at best.
What was cherry picked to present a misleading picture?
Sigh...
@DaShuckster is not a legitimate sparring partner. Never has been, never will be. He's not interested in having a discussion that weighs both sides, he's only interested in straw-manning what you say, then doing this weird thing where he tries to put his poor understanding of your argument on display like he's speaking to a crowd.
