USF Switching to Adidas
- Thread starter Poolside Knight
- Start date
Taking off the black and gold glasses here, but good for them. UA had made their uniforms into a garish mess of patterns and weird neons. Their color combo of green and gold would look much cleaner with some traditional uniform elements.
not if you look at it from a recruit persective
Nike>UA>Adidas>Russel Athletic
Adidas is a clear #1 for Soccer but not Football & other sports
Under armour sucks lol. Kids these days like Adidas almost as much as Nike.
And you must pronounce it AH-dee-DAHS
Adidas is better at matching the Waste Management color scheme
I heard UCF was about to leave Nike for BBBrand
No, seriously a lot kids like and wear Adidas especially Yeezys and their boost collection. You won't see many people wearing Under Armour
for Football jerseys, shoes, and Track & Field Nike is Worlds better than Adidas. It's not even close
This doesn't matter much for old Traditional Powers but for newer programs it does. Just look at UCF the last few years
Well, I was talking about strictly shoes as far as Adidas being liked as much as Nike by my demographic. They are certainly not "world's better" than Adidas. The only people that believe that are out of touch soccer dads.
They guaranteed they'd spell their name correctly. It was an offer they couldn't refuse.
Nike is still double what Adidas is. Nike has better cleats, better jerseys, better everything. The ONLY thing adidas is good at is soccer, thats their bread and butter, and even at times nike does it as well (see 99% of world soccer players have either the Nike Mercurials (most popular cleat on earth), Hypervenom, Pumas (yes pumas) or Adidas gloros).
Nike football cleats are by far the best, vapors have been the cream of the crop for years with Adizeros coming second.
Yeezy's are overpriced crap buckets, other than that Adidas is only good at some of their casual clothing.
Nike has always and will always be better than Adidas.
Adidas are for people who cant afford nike. Adidas are for soccer dads and arent even to be mentioned in the same breath as nike for best football equipment.
Nike is the Peter Lugers of football.
Adidas is the Capital Grille....while its very good and certainly acceptable, not nearly the quality of the previous selection.
you guys realize all this crap is made in China right. Adidas, Under Armour, Nike, etc.
Adidas just paid Louisville $20 million and Under Armour paid UCLA $20 million. If UCF is down around $3 million with Nike, I'm fine making a switch.
If we poll the players and they all want another brand that isn't Nike then I support the move. As a fan, I would prefer to never wear Under Armour. The brand strength is weak, just look at their stock value. I wouldn't be surprised if the brand died out. Nike and Adidas will be around forever.
We're going to beat USF so bad next year they'll have to switch to LA Gear.
Similar threads
