What Republican contenders could you actually see winning the nomination?
- Thread starter UCFKNIGHTS88
- Start date
You can't believe the Planned Parenthood website stats or their annual report. 76% of their services is letting ho's be ho's. 20% is Healthcare.
Read the fact checker:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...3-percent-and-94-percent-are-both-misleading/
They are big, and do just fine on their own, we don't need to subsidize them. The Gov't is BROKE. I am against subsidizing, and giving any type of extra break to any business. The playing field needs to be equal for all.
Fab, u ever consider that the 34% for contraception might be used by married heteros to prevent babies that they cannot afford to feed on their own non-government assisted salaries?
.
.
Yes. It would be interesting to see the composition of the 34% but based on the number of STDs they are treating, I would suspect they are the minority...unless the married women are ho's.
Is bringing a baby into the world under another broken home the right thing? Maybe they get abused daily, maybe they are born addicted to something.
Nope. But neither is killing a baby. If people would practice abstinence we wouldn't have this problem would we? There are also thousands of couples that would be willing to adopt these babies if our adoption process wasn't so burdensome and expensive.
Abstinence aint happening, and even condoms/pills arent 100%. But I do agree that the adoption process needs an overhaul.
I hope it's Trump. It's too early for me to really care about the candidates "positions" or "promises". I like Trump because of how much the Republican party is against him. That tells me he must be a good candidate for me as a voter/citizen, since he's such a feared candidate for the party. The last candidate the GOP feared this much was Reagan.
I'm not a fan of Trump. I'm hoping it's Cruz. The GOP insiders and establishment hate Cruz and he actually has some balls.
It's easier to be pro choice when it's just words instead of image of literally killing a baby
They ought to make those pro-choice women, who are having abortions, watch it while it happens via little Go-pros in the womb. Then they can tell us it's no different the removing a tonsil.
I'm open to anyone the GOP establishment hates. The more Fox News rails against a candidate the more interested I get in them.
Carson is one of the few candidates that has the cojones to speak the truth. There is NOTHING inaccurate about what he has said. CAIR and these other Moolsim organizations are just a bunch of lying, hypocritical, jihad supporting bastards with the goal of global domination. With the help of the left and other politically correct dumbasses, they are winning the war. The strife in Syria, with the resulting exodus, will have ramifications that will last for decades.
Fab do you understand what PP is for? Its not for your daughter (dont know if you have one but follow me foe a second) whom you will teach right and wrong, and to be smart about sex, and to not have sex unless the wasp she is sleeping with is rich and wearing a condom and has never had another sexual partner in his life (obviously some shots but there is a point). Planned parenthood is for the girls who dont have you in their life.
until people stop going nuts when they hear that people want to have sex for non reproductive reasons, and say free birth control for everyone so they dont need to have an abortion, you will need PP
Dmarino, Planned parenthood was set up for one major purpose, to reduce the population of undesirables in our society. Primarily Blacks and Mentally deficient.
This most likely is still the purpose, although blacks and mentally deficient has been replaced by morally bankrupt.
Threads like this one terrify me, as they relate to the future of our nation. Good thing 99% of the contributors will be out of the voting population in a decade or two.*
I prefer he just keeps playing the idiot. We don't need another Bush nor Clinton in the big house.
As for those who could win
Rubio, Cruz, Bush, Trump, maybe a trump, carson, fiorina.
Best tix... Rubio/ fiorina or kasich
The Republicans just need to put a candidate up who can run an effective campaign and not say stupid shit like Romney did in 2012. Romney ran the worst campaign possible in a very favorable year to oppose Obama.
I say this because either way they're going to face a highly beatable Democrat.
Clinton is easily one of the absolute worst candidates to run in the modern era. She's corrupt, has more baggage than a hotel, most Democrats don't even like her, she will do nothing to inspire the black vote, middle class white people don't like her, and she's absolutely awful in debates. This was all true in 2008 and that's why Obama so easily over took her.
On the other hand, if the D's elect Bonkers Sanders, it's even easier. The guy is a fringe left wing extremist who excites the hardcore socialist zealots but no one else. He'd be exposed the minute he had to debate these ideas of his and start putting price tags next to them.
A Rubio/Fiorina ticket would win easily IMO
I say this because either way they're going to face a highly beatable Democrat.
Clinton is easily one of the absolute worst candidates to run in the modern era. She's corrupt, has more baggage than a hotel, most Democrats don't even like her, she will do nothing to inspire the black vote, middle class white people don't like her, and she's absolutely awful in debates. This was all true in 2008 and that's why Obama so easily over took her.
On the other hand, if the D's elect Bonkers Sanders, it's even easier. The guy is a fringe left wing extremist who excites the hardcore socialist zealots but no one else. He'd be exposed the minute he had to debate these ideas of his and start putting price tags next to them.
A Rubio/Fiorina ticket would win easily IMO
Can the Donald really win the nom?
His positions aside, think it's funny how he's rustling jimmies
His positions aside, think it's funny how he's rustling jimmies
Although I do agree with some of what you're saying, Dem's will go for Hillary over Rubio/Fiorina all day when it comes down to it. Rubio isn't ready and Fiorina is already starting to sound crazy. Plus her business record is going to get shredded by the her GOP competitors over the next few months.
Huh? Of course Democrats will vote for Hillary. I'm talking about how MANY of them show up to vote, especially when talking about demographics such as the black vote, youth, and middle class white vote that turned out heavily for Obama. The black vote was WAY higher in 2008/2012 that it has ever been. Can Hillary repeat that? I really doubt that.
My point is that a lot of D's will sit home if Hillary is the candidate. She's as inspiring as a log.
Of course they'll show up. Bush already said he wants to take away our free stuff. We can't have that happen now can we.
Latest posts
-
-
UCF safety Nikai Martinez enters the transfer portal
- Latest: FrostedKnight
-
OT: Conjoined twins Lori & George (Dori) passed away
- Latest: Colbourns Dream
