ADVERTISEMENT

When is it ok to use a gun?

BLUF:

I would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

In the scenario provided, the intruder would be dead as hell. The intruder would’ve been attacked by my dog and I would’ve killed him before he could even get to my child.
 
Which is pretty close to the legal definition. Let me ask you, if someone acts like they have a gun in their jacket and points their fingers inside the jacket and say they are going to shoot and kill you and appears like they might have indeed have a gun, what is acceptable in that circumstance?
The legal justification is a perceived threat which doesn’t have to be actual and is an objective measure. I don’t have a problem with it. However in society there exist biases which cause people to perceive a greater threat when interacting with those who don’t look like them. It’s natural human behavior. There is no simple fix. If there were it would have already been addressed.
 
The legal justification is a perceived threat which doesn’t have to be actual and is an objective measure. I don’t have a problem with it. However in society there exist biases which cause people to perceive a greater threat when interacting with those who don’t look like them. It’s natural human behavior. There is no simple fix. If there were it would have already been addressed.
This is true but reasonable bias is a component of fear and in play for a self-defense justification. For example, if a 100 pound 80-year-old grandmother expressed a fear of a 6’3 255-pound biker in leathers, that would very well be a reasonable fear if that biker was acting aggressively. There is an understandably real disproportionality of force between the two. Which matters as well. It’s more complicated than armed or unarmed.
 
... in society there exist biases which cause people to perceive a greater threat when interacting with those who don’t look like them. It’s natural human behavior. There is no simple fix.
The first step in fixing it is acknowledging this natural human behavior exists.

Ignoring its existence in our policing -- and the ever-increasing videotaped examples of its inevitable consequences -- isn't going to improve anything.

Any administration who believes that a "tougher on crime" approach is the answer is completely missing the boat. It's only throwing gasoline on an already intense fire.
 
My old firearms instructor used to preach to do everything possible to escape and avoid a situation where drawing a concealed pistol is required because of this question. Even if you’re on legally sound footing, taking the escape route is a better situation.

That said if there is none then draw.
 
Just assuming this thread is specifically targeted at police, it should be noted that the United States police kill by far the most citizens per capita in the world. From 2013-2018 6,837 Americans were shot and killed by police officers. Over the same time period in the UK there were 15 such incidents. 90% of the UK police force doesn’t carry a gun (routine police activities don’t warrant it). In Germany, where police do routinely carry guns, there were 47 incidents over the latest 6 year period where data is available. The issue in the US goes beyond even a race issue (though per capita African Americans account for a higher rate of incidents) . It is a culture issue and one that is essentially unique to the US.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shacket
Just assuming this thread is specifically targeted at police, it should be noted that the United States police kill by far the most citizens per capita in the world. From 2013-2018 6,837 Americans were shot and killed by police officers. Over the same time period in the UK there were 15 such incidents. 90% of the UK police force doesn’t carry a gun (routine police activities don’t warrant it). In Germany, where police do routinely carry guns, there were 47 incidents over the latest 6 year period where data is available. The issue in the US goes beyond even a race issue (though per capita African Americans account for a higher rate of incidents) . It is a culture issue and one that is essentially unique to the US.
It's the Dirty Harry Effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shacket
It's the Dirty Harry Effect.
I don’t think it is strictly a police problem. Police in the United States are far far more likely to encounter someone with a gun than any other country. It makes perfect sense that they are armed. We have to deal with a culture of guns in the United States that other countries don’t have. Police have to be prepared to meet any potential threat and in the United States it is pretty standard for that threat to include a gun. Certainly more so than other countries. This emphasizes our natural prejudices around what we perceive as a threat since the result of a misjudgement when a gun is involved is often lethal. The same prejudices exist in other countries, but their policing methods and range of realistic threats is different and so the outcomes of that prejudice are not as severe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaShuckster
I don’t think it is strictly a police problem. Police in the United States are far far more likely to encounter someone with a gun than any other country. It makes perfect sense that they are armed. We have to deal with a culture of guns in the United States that other countries don’t have. Police have to be prepared to meet any potential threat and in the United States it is pretty standard for that threat to include a gun. Certainly more so than other countries. This emphasizes our natural prejudices around what we perceive as a threat since the result of a misjudgement when a gun is involved is often lethal. The same prejudices exist in other countries, but their policing methods and range of realistic threats is different and so the outcomes of that prejudice are not as severe.
The 2nd amendment leads to a massive amount of gun deaths.

I know, I know, I'm a psycho liberal. Just don't shoot me.
 
The 2nd amendment leads to a massive amount of gun deaths.

I know, I know, I'm a psycho liberal. Just don't shoot me.

A society that is sick and a society that celebrates mentally damaging behavior leads to a massive amounts of gun deaths. More than half of gun deaths are suicides.

No one is going to shoot you so might as well retire that straw man.
 
A society that is sick and a society that celebrates mentally damaging behavior leads to a massive amounts of gun deaths. More than half of gun deaths are suicides.

No one is going to shoot you so might as well retire that straw man.
It was more of a joke than a "straw man" lol. Honestly answer this, do you think the widespread ownership of guns contributes to the obscene amount of gun deaths in the US?

I'm not one of the crazy "take your guns" guys, I get that the cat is out of the bag, but it's hard to argue that the 2nd amendment hasn't lead to a lot of death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hemightbejeremy
It was more of a joke than a "straw man" lol. Honestly answer this, do you think the widespread ownership of guns contributes to the obscene amount of gun deaths in the US?

I'm not one of the crazy "take your guns" guys, I get that the cat is out of the bag, but it's hard to argue that the 2nd amendment hasn't lead to a lot of death.
You have to look to other countries to be able to say. Yes, some places that have strict gun laws have led to fewer deaths, but there are also instances where it leads to genocide and mass killing by the government totalling in the hundreds of millions.
 
It was more of a joke than a "straw man" lol. Honestly answer this, do you think the widespread ownership of guns contributes to the obscene amount of gun deaths in the US?

I'm not one of the crazy "take your guns" guys, I get that the cat is out of the bag, but it's hard to argue that the 2nd amendment hasn't lead to a lot of death.
It would be helpful if you didn’t just lump everything together into gun deaths. People bent on suicide will find any way available to kill themselves. Guns are actually a poor way to go about it.

Also, I would hope that justifiable homicides would be a plus for gun owners, as that is someone who was threatened with imminent grave bodily harm or death. I would hope that we would all be grateful that an attacker was stopped from harming a victim.

So, for the rest of them, the overwhelming majority of firearm murders are committed by a small minority of gun owners and most of those are unlawfully possessing a firearm. I know it’s tempting to try to simplify the equation to more guns = more gun murders, but that is wholly inadequate to explain the complex problem. As Chicago has proven repeatedly, making firearms illegal does not keep people from possessing them; especially those with criminal intent. Even more especially when we share a border with a criminally corrupt country that is so porous that nearly anything can be smuggled across with relative ease.
 
You have to look to other countries to be able to say. Yes, some places that have strict gun laws have led to fewer deaths, but there are also instances where it leads to genocide and mass killing by the government totalling in the hundreds of millions.
Slightly extreme language but I get your point.
It would be helpful if you didn’t just lump everything together into gun deaths. People bent on suicide will find any way available to kill themselves. Guns are actually a poor way to go about it.

Also, I would hope that justifiable homicides would be a plus for gun owners, as that is someone who was threatened with imminent grave bodily harm or death. I would hope that we would all be grateful that an attacker was stopped from harming a victim.

So, for the rest of them, the overwhelming majority of firearm murders are committed by a small minority of gun owners and most of those are unlawfully possessing a firearm. I know it’s tempting to try to simplify the equation to more guns = more gun murders, but that is wholly inadequate to explain the complex problem. As Chicago has proven repeatedly, making firearms illegal does not keep people from possessing them; especially those with criminal intent. Even more especially when we share a border with a criminally corrupt country that is so porous that nearly anything can be smuggled across with relative ease.
I see your point, it's a clear oversimplification for sure.
 
It was more of a joke than a "straw man" lol. Honestly answer this, do you think the widespread ownership of guns contributes to the obscene amount of gun deaths in the US?

I'm not one of the crazy "take your guns" guys, I get that the cat is out of the bag, but it's hard to argue that the 2nd amendment hasn't lead to a lot of death.

I just told you that more than half of gun deaths are suicide so no, I don’t think the 2nd Amendment is a driving factor- I think our societal decay and moral erosion is more the factor at play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazyhole
I just told you that more than half of gun deaths are suicide so no, I don’t think the 2nd Amendment is a driving factor- I think our societal decay and moral erosion is more the factor at play.
Ok. I think the whole moral erosion societal decay thing is a little overdone personally. People have always been like this, just easier to see their tweets now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazyhole
I just told you that more than half of gun deaths are suicide so no, I don’t think the 2nd Amendment is a driving factor- I think our societal decay and moral erosion is more the factor at play.
Not to stray to far off-topic, but I think a lot of that "moral erosion" is due to spiritual oppression.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFKnight85
I just told you that more than half of gun deaths are suicide so no, I don’t think the 2nd Amendment is a driving factor
Depression is strictly an American thing?

Could a person's easy access to guns be a factor in our gun fetish country?

Believe it or not, we could give a gun to every single man, woman, and child in the U.S. of A -- and STILL have another 65 millions left over.

Naw, it's probably moral decay brought about by those lefties, right guys? :)
 
Ok. I think the whole moral erosion societal decay thing is a little overdone personally. People have always been like this, just easier to see their tweets now.
You don't think that being more visible perpetuates it? It seems to me that it makes things more socially acceptable that otherwise would not be.
 
When you see dangerous young kids playing on their own porch, or when you see anyone in a red baseball hat.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT