LOL.
This is getting so good.
I guess Trump is just draining the swamp, amiright?
This is getting so good.
I guess Trump is just draining the swamp, amiright?
Love it. Comey needed to go.
Dude even a trump homer like u can see the timing of this is strange to say the least. He fired comey because of how he handled Clinton investigation in 2016? But didn't do it until well into his own investigation?The same snowflakes blaming him for HRCs loss will now be crying about his firing. Just look. It's hilarious.
Dude even a trump homer like u can see the timing of this is strange to say the least. He fired comey because of how he handled Clinton investigation in 2016? But didn't do it until well into his own investigation?
Yes "snowflakes" were pissed at comey back but then but the same trump homers that are cool with him being fired today we're loving comey in 2016. Trump included!
Dude even a trump homer like u can see the timing of this is strange to say the least. He fired comey because of how he handled Clinton investigation in 2016? But didn't do it until well into his own investigation?
Yes "snowflakes" were pissed at comey back but then but the same trump homers that are cool with him being fired today we're loving comey in 2016. Trump included!
Lol ok guys sure thing
What's the point? The facts are so distorted by trump supporters really no point trying to argue them when they can't even be established to begin with.So no rebuttal to the facts? Just more fact less conspiracy theories?
Lol ok guys sure thing
So when new FBI director is appointed I presume the investigation into trump Russia ties will also convienently be shut down too? And then we'll see you and bob in here defending that tooRosenstein, US Deputy Attorney General (Comey's boss) was just confirmed on April 25th and was widely supported by both Democrats and Republicans by a vote of 94-6.
Rosenstein, after review, didn't have confidence in Comey for a variety of reasons so he left Trump no choice but to fire him.
So when new FBI director is appointed I presume the investigation into trump Russia ties will also convienently be shut down too? And then we'll see you and bob in here defending that too
Yates is a 30yr doj employee who was appointed by a republican lmao. She's not partisan. She owned ted Cruz yesterday when he tried to claim the same thing as you, google the video. The EO violated the constitution plain and simple and replublicans especially should be praising her for putting her job on the line to defend the constitution.Yates is partisan. She publically refused to do her job because she disagreed with a legal EO.
The FBI isn't the only agency investigating. There are more than a dozen intel agencies. The FBI, DNI, CIA and NSA released a joint report on the Russian investigation. Firing one guy won't make the investigation go away in the FBI and it sure as hell won't make them go away in Congress or the other agencies. You're all insane conspiracy theorists.
Funny thing is rosenstein sent trump the memo TODAY and comey was fired immediately.
Yates told trump that Flynn was compromised and lying to VP Pence and trump waited 18 days to fire him allowing Flynn to continue all regular NSA duties including sitting in on major calls and appointments on foreign policy. Trump only fired Flynn after the Washington post news broke too! If not Flynn would still be in there.
Remember Yates was not partisan and worked for both dems and repubs.
it's irrelevant to the matter. Trump knew Flynn was compromised and waited 18 days to fire him, only after wapo article came outYet Obama didn't take away Flynn's security clearance plus allowed him to travel to Russia last year for the paid gig.
Yeah, Yates and Obama were REAL concerned.
Yates is a 30yr doj employee who was appointed by a republican lmao. She's not partisan. She owned ted Cruz yesterday when he tried to claim the same thing as you, google the video. The EO violated the constitution plain and simple and replublicans especially should be praising her for putting her job on the line to defend the constitution.
Trump surrogates are on tv right now asking for everyone to "move on from Russia Investiation" but yah there's nothing there
Google the video. Yates explains it very well to Cruz. theres tons of information on it too. Gotta stop watching Fox News to see it thoughExplain how it's against the Constitution.
Where is the evidence in the Russia investigation? It's been going on for nearly a year. If there was anything there it would have been leaked under Obama and certainly during the first couple months when Obama appointments were still in their jobs.
Yates is 100% a partisan. She'll be on a Dem ticket within four years.
Again. Many GOP politicians coming out calling the timing of this firing suspicious. But yah just a dem conspiracy theory.
Not only did Obama fire him, but he told Trump not to hire him. Nice try.I've wanted him out since the whole "yeah she broke the law and risked national security etc. etc. but no we shouldn't prosecute."
As for the Russia investigation, if there is something there (there's not) it will continue to be investigated. Haven't seen a shred of evidence though. I like the "Obama earned Trump about Flynn" nonsense though since O gave him clearance and didn't take it away. Say what you want about Trump not firing him right away, at least he did it.
At least he did it? Lol only after the Washington post made it public that Flynn was compromised. IF that story doesn't come out Flynn is still director of NSA.I've wanted him out since the whole "yeah she broke the law and risked national security etc. etc. but no we shouldn't prosecute."
As for the Russia investigation, if there is something there (there's not) it will continue to be investigated. Haven't seen a shred of evidence though. I like the "Obama earned Trump about Flynn" nonsense though since O gave him clearance and didn't take it away. Say what you want about Trump not firing him right away, at least he did it.
No he didn't. not even once. He actually has said there was zero evidence of Obama wiretapping trump, though.And btw, Comey has said 3 times under oath that there is no evidence of Trump working with Russia. Why would he fire him for leading the investigation?
There's no reason to say it at all unless you are a nutjob lol. I legit thought it was a photoshop when I first saw itOutstanding!
When Comey failed to prosecute Hillary after announcing all her violations of national security law, it was obvious to everyone, he was being blackmailed to let Hillary go.
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY - So he didn't even get a chance to load up his cardboard box of bric a brac as they escorted him to the elevator after first confiscating his little gold badge and Glock 23.
There on the wall sits his autographed picture of Hillary, unwanted and headed for the dumpster.
It's great how Trump specifically mentions how on three occasions, Comey told him he wasn't under FBI investigation. There is no reason to say this except as a signal to the media which counters their ridiculous Russian theory. This is best news since pre-Syria days.
Now that's the Trump I voted for.
It's not her job to determine constitutionality. She failed to follow an EO, that is legal until determined unconstitutional, and was fired because of it. I have no issue there.Yates is a 30yr doj employee who was appointed by a republican lmao. She's not partisan. She owned ted Cruz yesterday when he tried to claim the same thing as you, google the video. The EO violated the constitution plain and simple and replublicans especially should be praising her for putting her job on the line to defend the constitution.
Trump surrogates are on tv right now asking for everyone to "move on from Russia Investiation" but yah there's nothing there
Weird cuz when she was confirmed by a republican house they asked her if she would stand up to a pres (at the time Obama) if he tried to pass an unconstitutional EO. She said she would and repubs rejoiced. Now that she actually did it faux outrage is aboundIt's not her job to determine constitutionality. She failed to follow an EO, that is legal until determined unconstitutional, and was fired because of it. I have no issue there.
On the general topic of Comey, it's bad timing. Comey did need to go for politicizing his position when he's an independent investigator. It's not his job to recommend charges but he did so in the Clinton investigation. But because there's an investigation related to Trump, it just doesn't look good and appears to make this position even more politicized.
And btw, Comey has said 3 times under oath that there is no evidence of Trump working with Russia. Why would he fire him for leading the investigation?
It's idiotic to praise white-knighting when her Roles and Responsibilities do not include such determinations. Pointing to Republican actions as a defense doesn't work, they're as hypocritical as they come (as are democrats). If someone, who's job is to implement the direction of the President, has the leeway to determine constitutionality then what's the purpose of the Judiciary. She overstepped and was fired, everything else is political posturing.Weird cuz when she was confirmed by a republican house they asked her if she would stand up to a pres (at the time Obama) if he tried to pass an unconstitutional EO. She said she would and repubs rejoiced. Now that she actually did it faux outrage is abound