ADVERTISEMENT

40000 violent liberals verbally and physically attack 20 "free speech" gatherers in Boston

Boston, there are adds in the newspapers where they are looking for people to show up. Many are getting paid $25 an hour to be a "social activist. At some point you have to follow the money.
 
You guys do know that "free speech" isn't just for your right wing Nazis. The physical assaults are of course illegal and reprehensible, but y'all are whining about other people exercising the exact same right that your side is using.

Of course I did forget that this is the cooler and none of you trumpets know how the 1st amendment works. My bad.
 
Boston, there are adds in the newspapers where they are looking for people to show up. Many are getting paid $25 an hour to be a "social activist. At some point you have to follow the money.

Got a source for this? If there are newspaper ads offering $25 an hour for protesters that should be pretty easy to snap a picture and post an article online.
 
For the 10000 violent liberals who couldn't find someone to fight with, they started picking fights with each other and the police. It's amazing they didn't shoot each other up or kill any cops.

Read through the boston.com , it's hilarious. Nowhere do they talk about the turnout of 20 free speechers, yes TWENTY. I mean you have boy scout meetings with more adults in attendance .
 
You can see the twenty free speechers in the rotunda , with the hoard of 10K "social activists", liberals and other hate activists or whetever you want to call them, surrounding them, ready to kill. You got guys with gang bandanas over their face looking to get some.

Walker_rally_0004-1-850x478$large.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
You can see the twenty free speechers in the rotunda , with the hoard of 10K "social activists", liberals and other hate activists or whetever you want to call them, surrounding them, ready to kill. You got guys with gang bandanas over their face looking to get some.

Walker_rally_0004-1-850x478$large.jpg

I too am outraged that there were people exercising their free speech rights at a free speech rally! Lock them up!
 
Huh, I'm learning all kinds of neat geography tips from the WC, never knew that Boston, MA is in the Charlotte, NC area. Thanks!
I understand your reading comprehension is not very strong and your struggle with day to day living but I never said Boston, I said people are getting paid to protest. You asked for proof and you were shown proof. Now run away child.
 
I understand your reading comprehension is not very strong and your struggle with day to day living but I never said Boston, I said people are getting paid to protest. You asked for proof and you were shown proof. Now run away child.

The very first word in your post was Boston...

But I forgot that you have the writing capability of a 3rd grade ESOL student and you were referring to the poster named Boston, not the city. So I'll take the credit for being wrong here I guess, not that Charlotte NC is much closer to Charlottesville, still a 5 hour drive.

Also Snopes says this story is uncofirmed btw.

http://www.snopes.com/crowds-on-demand/
 
The very first word in your post was Boston...

But I forgot that you have the writing capability of a 3rd grade ESOL student and you were referring to the poster named Boston, not the city. So I'll take the credit for being wrong here I guess, not that Charlotte NC is much closer to Charlottesville, still a 5 hour drive.

Also Snopes says this story is uncofirmed btw.

http://www.snopes.com/crowds-on-demand/
snopes, really?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevl...fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#7f80b931227f
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cludes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
 
I literally had to stop using Snopes altogether. The inconsistency was unreal, and politically motivated.

I don't always agree with Politifact, but they are pretty consistent on how they label things. So I cannot fault them on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFKnightfan08
The very first word in your post was Boston...

But I forgot that you have the writing capability of a 3rd grade ESOL student and you were referring to the poster named Boston, not the city. So I'll take the credit for being wrong here I guess, not that Charlotte NC is much closer to Charlottesville, still a 5 hour drive.

Also Snopes says this story is uncofirmed btw.

http://www.snopes.com/crowds-on-demand/

Snopes? Umm...read the news once in awhile. Snopes was outed long ago for their bias.
 
Next he'll be citing HuffPo, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow!

I realize Snopes is biased, however did you bother to actually read the article? They did the research and it seems fishy. You are familiar with Craigslist, anyone could post anything.
 
Need project veritas to find one of these ads and respond. I'm very curious to know for certain if the "paid protesters" thing is real. I've seen ads posted a lot after the fact so I tend to believe there's some fire here but would love to know for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knightmare777
Need project veritas to find one of these ads and respond. I'm very curious to know for certain if the "paid protesters" thing is real. I've seen ads posted a lot after the fact so I tend to believe there's some fire here but would love to know for sure.
The thing is the term "paid protesters" has morphed into a literal meaning by some folks. It was originated from the idea that some non-profit groups were being paid by George Soros or others to organize people to protest certain events or political offices. The protesters themselves don't get paid, but the non-profit gets a fat donation, or so the theory goes. That has some truth to it, but even that definition of paid protesters is a bit of a stretch in most cases. Sure, people who favor a cause might donate to a group that supports that cause, but such a donation may or may not be tied to any certain marching order to go protest something. I'd guess only a very small minority of those exist, and they probably don't amount to much.

The definition of paid protesters has since been twisted into thinking by some people that Soros or others are paying these groups to then actually pay people to be protesters. That claim has even less veracity and I'm not aware of any proven cases of it.
 
The thing is the term "paid protesters" has morphed into a literal meaning by some folks. It was originated from the idea that some non-profit groups were being paid by George Soros or others to organize people to protest certain events or political offices. The protesters themselves don't get paid, but the non-profit gets a fat donation, or so the theory goes. That has some truth to it, but even that definition of paid protesters is a bit of a stretch in most cases. Sure, people who favor a cause might donate to a group that supports that cause, but such a donation may or may not be tied to any certain marching order to go protest something. I'd guess only a very small minority of those exist, and they probably don't amount to much.

The definition of paid protesters has since been twisted into thinking by some people that Soros or others are paying these groups to then actually pay people to be protesters. That claim has even less veracity and I'm not aware of any proven cases of it.

The first part makes sense. Group A supports a cause, people that support that cause donate to group A to help further that cause.... that I get. $25 an hour to go riot is something Soros would do but I'd like to see proof if that's the case.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT