We've spent $6T on lockdown, not so much on SARS-CoV-2 itself.
I love the new Pfizer study on kids... 100% effective. No kid with the shot got it over many, many months. The problem?
Only 19 placebo kids caught it, all minor cases, really asymptomatic for the most part, over many, many months. So, yeah, 1%, yeah, 100% effective at stopping the 1%.
All Pfizer re-proved is kids aren't getting it really at all, even without the vaccine. But all of them can spread it, even with the vaccine.
Which is what medical research keeps showing. And SARS-CoV-2 will continue to be passed to the elderly and kill them, not really any different than OC43-CoV, just at a higher rate.
Seriously failing at objectivity and statistics all around. The elderly and high risk are the problem, not the kids, and neither lockdowns or vaccines of the kids will do much to stop it.
That's the thing... it's always been about isolating the elderly, not kids, not healthy people. The death rate went way down once 50%, let alone 70%, of the elderly were vaccinated.
We need to stop pushing the unapproved, EUA (Emergency Use) only, vaccine on everyone, until it's had far more testing, and reaches US FDA approval.
It's for the elderly and high risk where EUA makes sense. And this vaccine passport non-sense to even work or go to anything, not just the airport, is beyond hypocrisy.
TB kills 1.5M/year, legal immigrants (not even talking undocumented) to the US carry it 10x more than US citizens. But do we ban them from working, going anywhere? No.
Sigh... hypocrisy to the point of economic ruin.