My friend has a 23 year old daughter that is a lesbian, yet she's a virgin. She's never even been on a date, but she knows who she's attracted to. She's just been afraid most of her life to be open because of how conservatives view her (living in a red state).
But it's not just conservatives. Various groups like to out people, because they feel they have no right to privacy.
When the US gets back to looking at people as individuals, and respecting their privacy, we'll all be better off. The funny thing is that Conservatism here in the US is staring to slowly 'rediscover' that, while Progressivism increasingly being against that Liberal ideal.
E.g., we saw that with the Covington Kids defending a gay man against bigots.
That homosexuality exists in all species, yet homophobia exists in only one.
That's really a stretch. It's like saying only humans get drunk and drive cars irresponsibly.
Now what is true is that homosexuality is found in nature, even every commonly (50%+) in a subset of species. But some of them also have medical complications because of it too. But that's
'bigotry' to even mention that, oddly enough, despite being scientifically true.
I.e., No one likes to visit the fact that homosexuality, from a religious text aspect, like most things in religious texts, pre-printing press, pre-medicine, pre-everything, was to warn of the complications of introducing orifices to the bacterial havens of our bodies. It had really less to do with homosexuality, but sexual practices.
In fact, we're seeing a massive resurgence in STD infection rates in the US and UK for a reason, worse than the Boomers, way, way worse than Gen-X (who had the AIDS scare). And yet, in countries like France, which make both Conservatives and Progressives
'cringe' with their culture, STD rates are very low ... especially among teens ... especially where -- gasp -- women aren't 'protected' like here in the US.
Why is that?
I.e., it's not just Conservatives causing issues in the US. Progressives are as well. I'd even argue that since 2006, Progressives are just as bad.
That's why I really don't care for all this non-sense. Let people be individuals, in their private lives, and stop judging ... both sides.
Murderer is too broad of a term. Many soldiers are technically murderers. They have killed someone. Anyone is capable of being a murderer in the right scenario.
OMFG ... Geez! This is what I cannot stand about Progressives!!! You play right into the Conservative trap!
I.e., As a pro-Woman's Rights / pro-Right-to-Choose Libertarian, I really hate it when Progressives go there. And it's 10x even more stupid when you call a solider a murderer! Dumb, dumb, dumb!
E.g., a solider kills an enemy combatant who has decided to be there, as a peer ... an equal soldier, killing. That's called combat. It's not murder. A soldier who violates the rules of engagement other laws can be a murder. But a soldier that kills a peer combatant is not. But now ... you give the Conservative some
'ammunition.' Why?
Because did the baby choose to be
'at odds' with the mother? Even in the case of incest, rape ... or the baby
'killing' the mother because of some medical issue, but did the baby
'choose'? Geez, you call a soldier a
'murderer' for combat against a peer that also chooses, and you open up this argument for a baby that doesn't.
^^^ This is why Progressives are too dumb to argue with Conservatives, and we Liberals and Libertarians cringe. You just called soldiers murderers, and it's so easy for Conservatives to flip that against Abortion. Dumb, dumb, DUMB!!! You really are the stupid of the stupid Progressive type.
But are they pyschopaths? You can be psychotic and never act out. Doesn't mean you're not a pyschopath. After all, most psychopaths aren't identified until they act out. Doesn't mean they weren't psychotic before their first offense.
There are 4 types of soldiers. Only one type, the tiny, small minority, are pyschopaths are murderers, and prosecuted for being murderers. But they are almost always filtered out.
I still cannot believe you went there on
'soldiers.' Geez you're dumb, dumb, DUMB to do that!
You don't learn to be gay.
But people do learn about different, sexual approaches. One of these days we'll focus on individuals, instead of groups. One of these days we'll stop arguing left and right and all the meta-BS that doesn't matter.
I still cannot believe you went there on
'soldiers.' It just opens up the ultimate avenue for an anti-Abortion argument from Conservatives.