By **** off I meant: not having the correct sex on their driver's license. I'm sorry for exaggerating but you are being incredibly difficult to reason with. The government can deal with the problems that come from having the correct sex listed on the drivers license. This isn't a "my view", it's the truth, and you've already admitted it.
I apologized for the one insult already, why don't you try calling out 85. Every other word out of his mouth is insult towards me.
Damn snowflake you mad? I simply said that if you can't understand a simple difference that 117 years makes in approaches to science, perhaps it's time you tap out of this debate. I'm sorry that hurt your feelings so.
There is one thing I don't understand: if they are transgender, hermaphrodite, transvestite, whatever; what does it matter what the driver license says? Is there a dress code for driving?
Why? They'd just get the rate for the worst driving gender at their age. I don't think the insurance companies would have a problem with the gender thingEvidently insurance companies would be incapable of insuring people if they don't have M or F on their drivers license.
if they get 3 options, soon they will ask for 4, 5, 6, etc. i think facebook has 58 options. where does it stop? this isnt just for driving its for identification purposes and also there is the changes proposed to the birth certificates.There is one thing I don't understand: if they are transgender, hermaphrodite, transvestite, whatever; what does it matter what the driver license says? Is there a dress code for driving?
there are only 2 options. to deny this is to deny basic scientific fact.
you need to get out and relax more. tell you what, ill give you the .3% being right. I'll take the other 99.7% and we will call it a day.YOU
ARE
WRONG
Already proven to you, you admitted it, you read the paper. Stop being purposefully ignorant, it undermines your credibility in other areas and just makes you look dumb.
you need to get out and relax more. tell you what, ill give you the .3% being right. I'll take the other 99.7% and we will call it a day.
YOU
ARE
WRONG
Already proven to you, you admitted it, you read the paper. Stop being purposefully ignorant, it undermines your credibility in other areas and just makes you look dumb.
smh
Question: when it comes to the SEX of a baby, and aside from statistical anomalies, are there possibilities beyond either a penis or vagina? Hence signifying either a female or male?
Is there some part of the world where babies are being born with reproductive organs other than these 2 options that i'm not aware of?
What "sub-gender" a person identifies with later in life is irrelevant. I am talking purely and specifically about the physiological biology of a human being that boils down to, does the baby have a penis or vagina.
85, he has stated he is ok with being right 0.3% of the time. I guess we will just have to settle for 99.7%.
Now the real question is how do we split up the 99.7%. We could do an even split or maybe we do split custody. I know a family lawyer, he could help us work it out. Maybe you get weekdays and I get weekends or vice versa? How about every other day? Maybe Mon/Wed/Fri and we alternate weekends?
Why are you ignoring statistical anomalies? You realize that includes tens of millions of people? Do they not matter because it hurts your feelings to have something other than a "M" or "F" on their drivers license? Should millions of people have incorrect information listed on their forms all because you are a snowflake?
10s of millions of people are being BORN without either a female or male reproductive organ? Really? Qualify this then.
We should get rid of the M or F designation and just add a P and a V to the driver license. Options: check mark on 1 of the letters, check mark on both letters or no check mark. That should cover everybody10s of millions of people are being BORN without either a female or male reproductive organ? Really? Qualify this then.
Google % of people born intersex. I already linked an article talking about how people who are intersex can't accurately be identified through forensic DNA tests due to them having both M and F markers. Its anywhere between .3 to 1.5 % of the population.
I did just that and the real answer is no one has a clue. Most intersex don't even meet what I just described, which is being born without EITHER- most of them are born with both it seems.
why not stick with dna?We should get rid of the M or F designation and just add a P and a V to the driver license. Options: check mark on 1 of the letters, check mark on both letters or no check mark. That should cover everybody
why not stick with dna?
Why?why not stick with dna?
So what value does XX or XY have?Guess we need to bump this thread again to show how utterly idiotic the gender "debate" is.
tl;Dr there is no debate, science has proven via DNA testing that millions of people are intersex or don't have the typical XX or XY sex chromosomes. Red hat morons don't care about science and want to stick with their beliefs because they are snowflakes and offended by the truth.