How do you know she didn't speak to the student? Is there anything from what you've read that would deign just that? Of course not. You are operating under a bunch of wild straw man assertions that are really easy to beat down. And LMAO at abuse of power and status at the school. SHE'S AN ADJUNCT. The department she works for gives her a semester-by-semester contract that can be terminated at any time, AND FOR ANY REASON. Rollins is under no obligation to bring her back or employ her any further than she needs to be. She receives no benefits, insurance or retirement, for what she does. Keep trying, though. This is a lot of fun.
Yes. It was quite obvious in the article that the grade was a shock to him and that it wasn't exactly handed out after caring consultation. The only thing undetermined is how violent the act of retaliation by her against him really was... how many other students did she slap with that kind of grade?
I think you just like saying straw man without knowing what it really means... might want to set that one down for a little while and study logical fallacy some more.
You have to understand that her position of power is derived from authority to lead a classroom and assign grades. This has zero to do with adjunct status, which should indeed be terminated before the end of its natural expiration at the end of the semester.
This horse is pretty dead Jose