And you're the prototypical leftist who incessantly accuses people of something that you yourself do tenfold.The irony of your quote is priceless, sk8.
Proof that @ShinobiWolf and all of his various board incarnations is far from the worst troll we've got here.
No, you're a far better troll because you actually get us to engage in conversation with you even though it is pointless.
Yeah, I'm a good troll because I try sharing facts with you that clearly make you uncomfortable.
Actually, its such a priority that the House wants some assurances that the Senate leadership is going to take it seriously, particularly given Moscow Mitch's comments to FOX NEWS.
I'm sure the Senate trial will be exceedingly fair, thorough, and impartial. They'll get the real players in this saga to testify so all Americans will know what did, or didn't happen, right?
Yeah, that 'bribery or other high crimes' part of the impeachment clause is SO wishy-washy.
The house had the ability to call those players as well. Why didn't they follow through and rush this thing? Impeachment subpoenas would be a priority for SCOTUS so it would have only taken a few weeks to accomplish their goal of getting testimony from anyone they wanted.
Huh. Trump wasn't accused of bribery or high crimes in the impeachment articles. Take a lap.
Take him for what he is: an antagonist. Never presents an argument that supports facts, just belittles or trolls anyone that disagrees with him. (S)he thrives on confrontation in a safe space where (s)he can't be held accountable. Continually is proven wrong but resorts to hyperbole, strawman arguments or anecdotal evidence to stir up controversy which his leftist brethren gravitate towards like a fly to crap.
Thank you for not assuming my gender but I actually identify as a Pansexual Transgender Hispanic Happy Holidays Starbucks Cup that has been signed by future NFL hall of famer Colin Kaepernick so please use my preferred pronoun of "they."
You, me and Nancy Pelosi all know that there's not a chance in hell that the GOP Senate is going to convict Trump. But if they're not even going to pretend to have a real trial as Moscow Mitch and Lindsay Graham have said, then I think it's a great idea for Pelosi to hold their feet to the fire and demand a trial with some real teeth or simply hold on to the impeachment bill.
You are so quick to call everyone in the world hypocrites but you cant bring yourself to admit to the hypocrisy in Pelosi’s position?
Please explain to us all the hypocrisy of Pelosi's position.
Here’s an interesting article from WaPo that they ran back in June. It notes that executive privilege is most honored in national security, foreign policy, and law enforcement (such as investigations into a VP using his office to ensure immunity for his son’s corruptions). It also alluded to the Supreme Court being the arbiter of what is executive privilege and what is not. If Nancy was serious about this, she’d be suing Trump over his use of executive privilege in not having his staff testify.
Ok, if you want to play the stupid troll, I’ll oblige you and your sycophant Ninja. Pelosi chides the Senate for holding an “unfair trial” because they are simply going to rule on the evidence discovered in the House inquiry because she thinks that is “unfair” to the Democrat’s position. The hypocrisy is that the House trial was absolutely unfair to the President’s position and House Republican’s ability to present any opposition viewpoint. And when they were challenged on it, Schiff and Pelosi claimed it was a political process and not a legal one. But now she all of a sudden wants a “fair” proceeding? Only a complete moron would not acknowledge the hypocrisy of that position.
You are correct, Trump could actually go to the Supreme Court if it doesn’t go to the Senate and request the charges be dropped. They are unconstitutional because the charges are not high crimes or misdemeanors. I was listening to a constitutional lawyer from UF yesterday on a local Tampa station who said the Dems screwed themselves by not including any crimes in the articles.
Only 3 insults/rage adjectives in this sentence.
