ADVERTISEMENT

Cruz

Originally posted by KnighttimeJoe:
Originally posted by goodknightfl:
Originally posted by KnighttimeJoe:
Originally posted by goodknightfl:
Originally posted by Good Knight Sweetheart:

Can't wait to see all those Obama birther people defend Teddy's Canadian birth.
I have never been a Birther, but I will take a crack at it for them.
It is utterly shocking how damn stupid you are. Someone needs to get your ass away from the computer before you do some real damage.
I am glad the most educated monkey on the board can read. I stated I didn't agree with them. simply wrote what they would say. But as normal you can't comprehend what you read.
Uh huh. You've spent this entire thread chasing your tail and continually revealing your utter nonsense. Keep it going old man.
First thing I wrote on this thread was I have never been a birther... I stand by that. Then wrote I will take a crack at what the birthers would say, Then you read what I write as if I am making those statements for me. So sorry you can not comprehend what you read. I have not chased my tail at all. Simply corrected the record. So keep on misrepresenting what I write, or doing the more likely, not understanding simple sentence above.
 
Sorry it was preamble to Declaration and not preamble to Constitution. Hell Its been 40 years since I was in school reading and learning this stuff. Whether these rights were given by an involved or uninvolved God doesn't matter, Cruz was simply stating these rights were God given and not Man given. As such man has no authority remove them.
 
Originally posted by goodknightfl:
Originally posted by KnighttimeJoe:
Originally posted by goodknightfl:
Originally posted by KnighttimeJoe:
Originally posted by goodknightfl:
Originally posted by Good Knight Sweetheart:

Can't wait to see all those Obama birther people defend Teddy's Canadian birth.
I have never been a Birther, but I will take a crack at it for them.
It is utterly shocking how damn stupid you are. Someone needs to get your ass away from the computer before you do some real damage.
I am glad the most educated monkey on the board can read. I stated I didn't agree with them. simply wrote what they would say. But as normal you can't comprehend what you read.
Uh huh. You've spent this entire thread chasing your tail and continually revealing your utter nonsense. Keep it going old man.
First thing I wrote on this thread was I have never been a birther... I stand by that. Then wrote I will take a crack at what the birthers would say, Then you read what I write as if I am making those statements for me. So sorry you can not comprehend what you read. I have not chased my tail at all. Simply corrected the record. So keep on misrepresenting what I write, or doing the more likely, not understanding simple sentence above.
Yes, I forgot that I misrepresented you not knowing the difference between the damn constitution and the DOI. GTFO.
 
Originally posted by KnighttimeJoe:
Originally posted by goodknightfl:
Originally posted by Good Knight Sweetheart:

Can't wait to see all those Obama birther people defend Teddy's Canadian birth.
I have never been a Birther, but I will take a crack at it for them.

Ted was born as a dual citizen in Canada, He was raised in Tex as a Christian, Capitalist, American.

Barack was born ?? ( my answer is Haw) as an American or ?? He was raised in Indonesia as a Muslim, Communist, Indonesian.

Ted went to College as an American raised in Texas. Barack went to an elite university that a person with his grades and standing normally would not get into. Did he get in as an American, (very tough) or as a foreign exchange student?? (much easier) Records are sealed, this can not be checked.

Obama has plenty of stuff buried that no one can get to. The question is what is it he does not want people to see?
It is utterly shocking how damn stupid you are. Someone needs to get your ass away from the computer before you do some real damage.
This was written before I said one word on constitution. Once again for your minor league intelligence I highlight sentence that makes it clear it is not my opinion. Yet U read it as my opinion. As usual you jump before you use that pea sized brain.
Don't put 2 unrelated conversations together. I had to memorize the preamble to the constitution 50 years ago, and should not have gotten it and Declaration mixed up. But you cant even read a simple statement while understanding it.
 
Originally posted by goodknightfl:
Sorry it was preamble to Declaration and not preamble to Constitution. Hell Its been 40 years since I was in school reading and learning this stuff. Whether these rights were given by an involved or uninvolved God doesn't matter, Cruz was simply stating these rights were God given and not Man given. As such man has no authority remove them.
And you wonder why the rest of the world thinks we are stupid. This is basic information that most anyone with a brain retains. Next thing you are going to tell us is that you pissed all over the toilet seat because you forgot to lift it. Or that you forgot the North won the Civil War because you were sure the South won.

Again, please get away from the computer. You are going to do some real damage one day.
 
Yes, and simple reading comprehension skills are usually maintained for a lifetime. You have long since lost yours.

On a side note, as someone from the North East, I am well aware of the fact that the union won the war. I think I will refrain from arguing proper potty procedures with you. I gave up having a bathroom fetish long ago.

This post was edited on 3/25 2:48 PM by goodknightfl
 
I guess after a half-black president we are good with a half-hispanic president.
Since the guy is whiter and a republican, everything is OK. Even his name is in Spanish: Roberto Cruz = Robert Cross.
 
"I guess after a FULL black president we are good with a half-hispanic president."


FIFY. One-drop rule in full effect.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
 
Originally posted by Good Knight Sweetheart:
You mean a Canadian president...
.
.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
He is half Mexican (Dad), half Canadian (born there) and half American (Mom).

Open border policy (north and south) is coming if he is elected
 
Originally posted by MACHater02:
Originally posted by UCFRogerz:


Originally posted by ChrisKnight06:
"I guess after a FULL black president we are good with a half-hispanic president."


FIFY. One-drop rule in full effect.

Posted from Rivals Mobile
But what about Russell Wilson?
Both of his parents are black.
His teammates say he's "not black enough", whatever that means.
 
Originally posted by UCFRogerz:

Originally posted by MACHater02:
Originally posted by UCFRogerz:


Originally posted by ChrisKnight06:
"I guess after a FULL black president we are good with a half-hispanic president."


FIFY. One-drop rule in full effect.

Posted from Rivals Mobile
But what about Russell Wilson?
Both of his parents are black.
His teammates say he's "not black enough", whatever that means.
"Small penis"
 
Originally posted by brahmanknight:
Originally posted by ProAttitude:

Originally posted by ChrisKnight06:
Lol



Please discuss..
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Cruz gets 4% of the vote.

On the otherhand, not sure how others changed your subject and wind up discussing "penis size" is beyond comprehension.
Are you uncomfortable discussing penis size, Pro?
At what length can you actually use the word "size". Crossing fingers that I qualify.
 
Originally posted by ucfversusbcs:

Originally posted by ChrisKnight06:
"I think Cruz's role is to keep the type of people that this message board resonates with engaged in politics through the primary..."


FIFY
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Cruz might be a religious nut job but its not like the democrats have anything to get excited about. Your choice, a person that clearly thinks she is above the law.
 
The fight on the Republican party will be interesting to watch. On the Right side of the party, (which is it's base) Cruz, Walker, Rubio will do well. The inside the beltway progressives who will have the insider $$ will support either Bush or maybe a Christie.

The tea party side needs the Right side to cull its candidates quickly. The problem they usually have is too many running for too long. By the time they get down to a couple of candidates they are too far behind to compete. My guess today, is a 4 man race with Cruz, Walker, Rubio, and Bush with bush having a clear insider advantage. If and when Jeb wins he locks up another 4 years for who ever the Democrat is in the race. 4 Million Republican voters sat out the last prez election, and those same voters will not show up for Bush either.
 
Originally posted by Sir Galahad:


Originally posted by ucfversusbcs:


Originally posted by ChrisKnight06:
"I think Cruz's role is to keep the type of people that this message board resonates with engaged in politics through the primary..."


FIFY

Posted from Rivals Mobile
Cruz might be a religious nut job but its not like the democrats have anything to get excited about. Your choice, a person that clearly thinks she is above the law.
She has broken no laws.
 
Originally posted by MACHater02:

Originally posted by Sir Galahad:



Originally posted by ucfversusbcs:



Originally posted by ChrisKnight06:
"I think Cruz's role is to keep the type of people that this message board resonates with engaged in politics through the primary..."


FIFY


Posted from Rivals Mobile
Cruz might be a religious nut job but its not like the democrats have anything to get excited about. Your choice, a person that clearly thinks she is above the law.
She has broken no laws.
That's because she's the head of the most deceitful family in modern US politics, and her and Bubba are absolute masters of lying, cheating, and fleecing people while somehow bending the law around what they're doing.

She's currently under subpoena during a Congressional Investigation and she just happened to permanently delete every email which might incriminate her, that just happened to be on a private server, against the formal US State Department policy regulation that was put in place by her.

It's just great. Even Frank Underwood thinks she's a master at this.
 
Originally posted by MACHater02:
Originally posted by Sir Galahad:
Mac, have you heard of obstruction of justice, read up on it.
Why, that's not happening.
Not only has it happened, it has happened several times with her. I don't expect you to believe it because like most liberals only one side can be corrupt. Say what you want about Cruz, he may be a nut but he seems to have ethics, something Hillary does not have. You can make any excuse you want for her, she's the worst type of politician there is.
 
She had already turned in the emails to the State Department when the server was cleared. She broke no rules or laws. Continue to grasp for straws.

Unrelated: GOP hasn't won an election without a Bush on the ticket since '72. I could be wrong but I don't see that streak ending in 2016.
 
After 223 Republican investigations, they still think the next one is going to pull up the stone that finds Hillary actually did something wrong.

BENGHAZI!!!!!
 
Originally posted by MACHater02:

She had already turned in the emails to the State Department when the server was cleared. She broke no rules or laws. Continue to grasp for straws.

Unrelated: GOP hasn't won an election without a Bush on the ticket since '72. I could be wrong but I don't see that streak ending in 2016.

She wiped the servers clean while under subpoena from Congress, and while you will make excuses for her actions, it is plain and simple a crime of obstruction of justice. Such a crime that if you or I did it we would face jail time but hey, since she is your only chance to win in 2016, I guess ethics do not matter.

Now I know full well what the demographics are of this country and what impact that has on a national election. I have little doubt that Clinton would win, national elections are more about getting more free stuff than anything else. At this point democrat and republican are basically the same, at least a Hillary presidency won't be as inept as the Obama one is in terms of international policy.
This post was edited on 3/30 10:13 PM by Sir Galahad
 
Originally posted by chemmie:
After 223 Republican investigations, they still think the next one is going to pull up the stone that finds Hillary actually did something wrong.

BENGHAZI!!!!!
Not surprisingly, you find nothing wrong with Clinton violating her own State Department regulations and deleting emails during a subpoena. Emails, mind you, that she kept hidden.

Nope, nothing to see here.
 
Originally posted by Sir Galahad:


Originally posted by MACHater02:

She had already turned in the emails to the State Department when the server was cleared. She broke no rules or laws. Continue to grasp for straws.

Unrelated: GOP hasn't won an election without a Bush on the ticket since '72. I could be wrong but I don't see that streak ending in 2016.

She wiped the servers clean while under subpoena from Congress, and while you will make excuses for her actions, it is plain and simple a crime of obstruction of justice. Such a crime that if you or I did it we would face jail time but hey, since she is your only chance to win in 2016, I guess ethics do not matter.

Now I know full well what the demographics are of this country and what impact that has on a national election. I have little doubt that Clinton would win, national elections are more about getting more free stuff than anything else. At this point democrat and republican are basically the same, at least a Hillary presidency won't be as inept as the Obama one is in terms of international policy.

This post was edited on 3/30 10:13 PM by Sir Galahad
Please explain to me the demographics of the US and its impact on the election.
 
Mac, it's very simple. The majority of this country now has a sense of entitlement instead of a sense of urgency.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT