Delay the election.
- Thread starter firm_bizzle
- Start date
SOme states already do it as well. Oregon has been voting by mail since 2000, Utah votes by mail, and a few others, and of course most states have allowed absentee ballots for various reasons. None of this is really that new.
Actually everyone who is of voting age has “business voting in the first place” regardless if you think the current measures in place are sufficient.
The best way to prevent fraud is blood samples and DNA matching but thats a pretty extreme measure for a small problem.
The real problem is voter supression. But suppressing the vote is a winning move for the GOP. Republicans know this and its why they are desperately trying to keep poor ex felons from voting in Florida when there is no reason for it and the people of Florida voted for it.
Fraud is like a tiny percent of the issue. 100 people are suppressed for every fraudulent vote.
For you all bringing up Obama repeatedly, you do know there would be actual shooting in the streets civil war right now started by you chuds if Obama had said the same thing, right?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ts-cast-in-the-2016-election-were-fraudulent/
4 cases of voter fraud nation wide in 2016.
https://www.thenation.com/article/a...e-the-photo-ids-required-to-vote-in-november/
300,000 voters in Wisconsin do not have access to the ID required by law to vote.
I wonder if you a could have some form of authentication for a mail in ballot that is just as safe as joe poll worker checking your ID at the polling station.
You don’t seem to know what suppression actually is, and bravo to linking to a progressive magazine as your proof
You asked for a link. I showed you 4 counts of voter fraud in 2016. Do you doubt that 400 people have their votes suppressed? Felons, ID laws, purging voter rolls, restrictive polling locations, inadequate machines, all of these play a part in making voting harder. If we are a representitive government we should strive to have a system that is truly representitive of our people. If you dont want that then you favor minority rule.
Interesting proposition. I dont agree with it, but we could maybe find a compromise on this.
How about we just go strictly to on-line voting? Set up a secure network server where people can go, plug in their SS number and address, and vote. Have the government keep a log of it so we get a clear picture of voting patterns among the races, genders, and age groups, and also on an individual basis so we can analyze the data so that we have a better understanding of how best to serve each individual. The right to vote is the most sacred of all constitutional rights, so we must protect and encourage each individual to do so for their own good.
It’s cute knowing you spent time frantically searching for some moron on Twitter to use that tagline with
Remember, these leaches don’t work. They search Twitter from 8 A.M. until 11:00 P.M. If it’s on Twitter, they will find it
That’s a 15 hour day!!!
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Last edited:
Not to worry. I’ve been following this “moron” comedian for a while. Sorry if it hit too close to home for ya.
Remember, these leaches don’t work. They search Twitter from 8 A.M. until 11:00 P.M. If it’s on Twitter, they will find it
That’s a 15 hour day!!!
Incredible that @hemightbejeremy also finds time to be a doctor within that timeframe
This confirms that he is. Physicians are great multitaskers
As Biden predicted weeks ago, Trump gives his first indication that he'd like to weasel out of the November 3rd election date.
His supporters reaction? Ignore it and talk shit about another WC poster.
His supporters reaction? Ignore it and talk shit about another WC poster.
Just like Biden trying to weasel out of debatesAs Biden predicted weeks ago, Trump gives his first indication that he'd like to weasel out of the November 3rd election date.
His supporters reaction? Ignore it and talk shit about another WC poster.
RIGHT GUYS????
The hilarious thing is you are so enamored by someone who has the title of doctor and think that their opinion somehow trumps any discourse anyone has with you on the coronavirus subject. Even if they are later outed as demon jizz doctors.
Yes it’s crazy that I’m enamored more with the opinions of doctors during a pandemic than yours. And by doctors I am referring to examples like the Stanford epidemiologists that I linked to a few months ago, whom you disagreed with and attempted to discredit their opinions. As epidemiologists.
Yeah, this wasn't a good post. Why would we listen to doctors when it comes to a medical issue? Because they are experts in that field.
We should not delay the election. Disagree with even thinking about doing that. We also should not do ALL mail in voting. If I can go to Wally world and Publix, I can go to voting site. I do believe most people over the age of 70 should request mail in voting, but that is their choice.
Nope. Postpone until everyone can show up in person. Might take years but it's for the safety of everyone.
He probably won't be around. Postpone the election and replace Biden with Newsom.
Are you talking about John Ioannidis? He was disproven month ago. He predicted 10,000 total deaths in the US.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17...e-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
It wouldn't surprise me if he catches covid and has to step down from his candidacy. TBH, I think a Harris vs Trump election would be a much better match up and should have happened in the first place.
It’s fine that you found a doctor that said what you wanted to hear. It’s just funny now that you keep bringing it up months later after they turned out to be wrong and I was right. Let this be a harsh lesson. Doctors aren’t infallible. Sometimes obvious stuff is obvious and non doctors can be correct instead.
Read the article, he was right about everything. He didn't predict 10,000 deaths, he was talking about the number of deaths IF 1% of the country is infected based on the Diamond Princess model. His CFR projection was much closer to being accurate than the 3.4% that the WHO projected.
So basically you picked one part from that to prove that you’re a better epidemiologist than a Stanford epidemiologist
Yeah I don’t think he was the one 85 is talking about since he does make a lot of good points. I recall 2 younger doctors. There was also some study that made 85 think half the population had already had the virus by March. It’s hard to remember exactly but I’m sure he will enlighten us.
I’m no doubt better at statistical modeling given basic assumptions.
Trump will step down too. The next 6 months will be unlike anything we've ever seen.
Scott Atlas from Stanford has been all over this so that's probably who he referenced. Again, Atlas has been right about pretty much everything. Also the epidemiologist from Yale has been saying the same stuff.
Yeah it was months ago so I don’t remember exactly what beef 85 had with me at the time. I just remember trying to convince him that half the population hadn’t already been infected with coronavirus. Seems like it went on for a month or so. And it was a study by doctors (good study actually). When I disagreed with his conclusion (half the population already had it) in favor of the actual conclusion (between <1% and half already had it with half ruled out due to empirical evidence) he fell into his “how dare you question a doctor” routine. Which apparently continues to this day with demon jizz doctors that tell him what he wants to hear.
