ADVERTISEMENT

Donald Drumpf sucks thread but come in and watch Sir Gal and Coke kneel before the dumbass

What are your thoughts on the protectionist themes in Trump's campaign, thus far?

I'd like to hear Coke's thoughts, as well.
Thoughts on Trump's supposed opinion: Very few effs given.

Trump is doing Politics 101. He needed/s to say whatever to get the nom - it's a game (that he wasn't asked/approved to play) & he killed it & it kills the dickless GOPe dopes. Principles don't win: see Ron & Rand Paul, but Rand brought his L on himself for acting like ¡Yeb! for 80% of his campaign.

I look at Trump as a hopeful to kill this Cuck Republican Party (Corportate Party). Ships sailed on saving it cos all it is: Abortion rhetoric, promoting illegal aliens to grow consumerism, endless wars, & barely not Democrat (Corportate Party) action. ain't Ike's party.

As for the protectionism & free trade, too hard to have a broad brush one size fits all stance, i.e. What the hell is an "American" car? The GM hencho en Mexico or the BMW made in SC? WAYYY too much bullshit (unions, tax laws, bad actors, currency manipulation) for what I would love as far as actual real international free trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brahmanknight
Thoughts on Trump's supposed opinion: Very few effs given.

Trump is doing Politics 101. He needed/s to say whatever to get the nom - it's a game (that he wasn't asked/approved to play) & he killed it & it kills the dickless GOPe dopes. Principles don't win: see Ron & Rand Paul, but Rand brought his L on himself for acting like ¡Yeb! for 80% of his campaign.

I look at Trump as a hopeful to kill this Cuck Republican Party (Corportate Party). Ships sailed on saving it cos all it is: Abortion rhetoric, promoting illegal aliens to grow consumerism, endless wars, & barely not Democrat (Corportate Party) action. ain't Ike's party.

As for the protectionism & free trade, too hard to have a broad brush one size fits all stance, i.e. What the hell is an "American" car? The GM hencho en Mexico or the BMW made in SC? WAYYY too much bullshit (unions, tax laws, bad actors, currency manipulation) for what I would love as far as actual real international free trade.

"He's lying in literally everything he says, but I want to elect him anyways and hope he's not actually as batshit retarded as he sounds right now!"

smh
 
Missing the point. He's probably more establishment than you give him credit for.
I'd definitely concede that. Least establishment of the bunch, but kinda not really. No need to post him ear to ear grinning w Hillary.

BTW, not even above any of this Corporate Party shit, if I get a bonus for being the manufacturer behind blowing up Crapistani kids in the name of they hate us for our freedom, well someone else is gonna do it anyway unfortunately
 
I love your logic.

You're basically saying that all politicians lie to some degree, so "I'm going to support the one that literally lies about everything, invents easily disprovable things and lies about them anyways, and insults my intelligence by admitting that he's lying, which somehow makes me more principled in not voting for those other guys who only lie occasionally".

It's the most assbackwards, idiotic logic I've ever heard.

I can't think of anything more dangerous that voting for a guy who doesn't even attempt to understand the Constitution or policy, just because he promises to lie the most of anyone.
 
Constitution? Wtf gtfo. Republican-Democrat Politics is barely one notch above TMZ/the Bachelor, except the 30% of industries that live of govt teet prop it in to some important shit. Fück it. Ain't 100. I say fūck em.
 
Gotta love a trump fan accusing others of being "one step above TMZ"

You've jumped the shark, or hitting the sauce early today.
 
meh definitely hitting the sauce, but it's been this way for decades when it was a joke in the MSM about a lack of difference between the bush (the one who did 9/11) & al gore the planet saver who flies around on his private jet when his papa made tons of cheddar off of fossil fuels
 
Lena Dunham has said she'll move to Canada if Trump wins. Joining many other loser celebrities saying the same thing.

If this list continues to grow, it may give me at least 1 reason to support Trump.
 
Lena Dunham has said she'll move to Canada if Trump wins. Joining many other loser celebrities saying the same thing.

If this list continues to grow, it may give me at least 1 reason to support Trump.
If it's anything like Alec Baldwin, who threatened to do the same after GW Bush won his second term, it's an empty threat.
 
Lena Dunham has said she'll move to Canada if Trump wins. Joining many other loser celebrities saying the same thing.

If this list continues to grow, it may give me at least 1 reason to support Trump.
I finds Girls occasionally brillent ( but mostly petulent, but that's kinda the point of the show ) and Lena does some funny stuff, but I borderline hate her outside of her performances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACHater02
Someone is coming to grips with despite cucks calling him a racist & trying to rip the nom Trump's really an entertaining democrat lite who will still spend in to oblivion on the military so it's all good.
 
Trump is right, collision anywhere else you go to jail. Only in politics.

First off, a collision is something that happens between 2 cars. So strike 1, as usual.

Your strike 2 is the actual definition of collusion: secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.

I know you and Donald are really slow, but let's recap. There is nothing secret about what they're doing, nor illegal. It is not a conspiracy. And they aren't attempting to deceive anyone- they're being as open and honest about their intentions as it gets.

So basically, there is absolutely nothing here that would remotely warrant the use of collusion. But I know we're talking about Drumpf and his mindless supporters here, so carry on.
 
First off, a collision is something that happens between 2 cars. So strike 1, as usual.

Your strike 2 is the actual definition of collusion: secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.

I know you and Donald are really slow, but let's recap. There is nothing secret about what they're doing, nor illegal. It is not a conspiracy. And they aren't attempting to deceive anyone- they're being as open and honest about their intentions as it gets.

So basically, there is absolutely nothing here that would remotely warrant the use of collusion. But I know we're talking about Drumpf and his mindless supporters here, so carry on.
Did the two groups come out and define exactly what they were going to do. Listening to Kaisch on the today show he flat out said there is no public agreement between the two groups. He would not say to vote for Cruz in Indiana but his campaign manager has said to do so. You can't have it both ways and you can define it anyway you want but it smells of collusion. Now once again your personal attacks are laughable, scoreboard.
 
I'll make crying so great so fast. I've got a lot of friends that cry and they love it. How about Bear Bryant, that would be so great to get an endorsement from him. He was so nice to me.
 
Hillary going after Trump, Trump after Hillary. We are now in general election mode.
 
GOP voter base sufficiently in the acceptance phase. Matter of time before the big wigs fall in line behind Trump. At least the party is spared from a circus at the convention, I guess.
 
He still has a ways to go to get to 1235. Everyone knew 2 weeks ago that the last 2 weeks were going to be great for trump. Other than having momentum, nothing really changes. The delegates he got, were factored in. If he gets to 1235 it will happen in California. Trump could not win GOP without the NE, but can't win the NE in the general. As of today this is all noise, Hillary will be the next prez.
As a conservative,
TRUMP=HILLARY.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT