ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook labels Diamond & Silk "Unsafe"

Too bad the article doesn't say anything about why they were deemed unsafe...or have any facts in it what so ever.
 
If you don't like it, don't watch it. It's all about ratings and making money. Unless of course they're conservative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
i had no idea these 2 existed before this article came out. now ive liked and followed them on the various platforms. if someone wants to ban something, i normally go and read/watch what they want banned.

i hope this just makes them more popular.
 
Only if they're conservative. Need to shut down any dissenting viewpoints to get to the dystopia the left has wet dreams about.

Yup - it's us libs plan. You've figured it out. This and the Gay Agenda are top priorities moving forward.
 
Too bad the article doesn't say anything about why they were deemed unsafe...or have any facts in it what so ever.

Article did provide copies of some direct correspondence with fb "deciders".

Those 2 were said to be making the cable news car wash today (appearing on many different channels talking about their story).

NOTE: Had no clue these girls were still around...saw them once or twice on CNN during the campaign. Guess that helped them attract a ton of followers/fans.
 
Article did provide copies of some direct correspondence with fb "deciders".

Those 2 were said to be making the cable news car wash today (appearing on many different channels talking about their story).

NOTE: Had no clue these girls were still around...saw them once or twice on CNN during the campaign. Guess that helped them attract a ton of followers/fans.
They are frequently on Sean Hannity’s radio show. That gets them plenty of followers.
 
Is it conservative to blame Hillary Clinton for Russia having nuclear weapons?


Holy hyperbole Batman! I get your point and it's fair, but wow is it ridiculous that we've come to the point that this is a valid question.
 
That was this duo's claim on Fox and friends
I don’t understand why you’re giving them so much weight. She’s the political equivalent of LSU Dad; someone random commenting with some style that has no real background nor any substance to what they’re saying. Some like them because of the style and they get entertainment views but are you really taking them seriously?
 
I don’t understand why you’re giving them so much weight. She’s the political equivalent of LSU Dad; someone random commenting with some style that has no real background nor any substance to what they’re saying. Some like them because of the style and they get entertainment views but are you really taking them seriously?
Because people with a major platform spreading lies is dangerous. Too much of the GOP is sub 90IQ and fooled easily. That's why they have an audience to begin with.
 
That was this duo's claim on Fox and friends


Seriously? Good Lord, I'm glad I don't watch fox news anymore. Why is it that it has become so desirable to appeal to the lowest common denominator of any political group anymore?
 
Because people with a major platform spreading lies is dangerous. Too much of the GOP is sub 90IQ and fooled easily. That's why they have an audience to begin with.


Let's not act as though the DNC is exactly representative of the intellectual elite either. Both parties, and the libertarians for that matter, have dumbed down their message because they know a knuckle draggers vote is worth just as much as an intelligent person's, and they are much easier to manipulate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
Because people with a major platform spreading lies is dangerous. Too much of the GOP is sub 90IQ and fooled easily. That's why they have an audience to begin with.

So not only are you ignorant and wrong about most everything, you’re also a raging pretentious prick. In other words, a good liberal

But hey- you’re a “Republican” who wanted a Republican President! LOL!

Oh I forgot one other - you’re also clearly a massive liar
 
So not only are you ignorant and wrong about most everything, you’re also a raging pretentious prick. In other words, a good liberal

But hey- you’re a “Republican” who wanted a Republican President! LOL!

Oh I forgot one other - you’re also clearly a massive liar
I was independent pre Trump. Registered as a Republican in Indiana in 2016 because I thought it was time for a more conservative budget. I was willing to deal with the awful social platform of republicans because I didn't think they would be able or have the appetite to make major social issue changes. When it became clear that Trump was the worst Republican candidate on social issues maybe ever and had no intention of being fiscally conservative I did the only thing a patriotic American could do. I voted Hillary Clinton because I knew Trump would be a disaster and I was right.
 
Now you're just lying.

He was not the worst but he wasn't "good" either. Honestly, I don't think he has any "true values". He just spits out whatever he thinks the crowd he's speaking to wants to hear. I guess this can be said about a lot of politicians but he takes it to another level.
 
He was not the worst but he wasn't "good" either. Honestly, I don't think he has any "true values". He just spits out whatever he thinks the crowd he's speaking to wants to hear. I guess this can be said about a lot of politicians but he takes it to another level.
No, he was the worst for a lot of groups. Women. Muslims. Hispanics. No one has been this bad. Look at Ted Cruz, he's probably second worst and I'm sure he respects and loves his wife. He wouldn't go out of his way to help Hispanics speciffically but he wasn't vilifying them either.
 
No, he was the worst for a lot of groups. Women. Muslims. Hispanics. No one has been this bad. Look at Ted Cruz, he's probably second worst and I'm sure he respects and loves his wife. He wouldn't go out of his way to help Hispanics speciffically but he wasn't vilifying them either.
He has not been “the worst” for any of those groups. The rest is you buying the demagoguery that has been out there.

He argued for controlled immigration and noted that there are a lot of criminals coming in with the good on the southern border and you scream racism. Why can’t we separate the criminals from the good immigrants? Aside from that, can we differentiate Hispanic American citizens from illegal aliens and not just lump them all together for political expediency? It’s not fair to them or the rest of us either.

He argued for restriction of immigration from countries that had no way to screen their people in their country of origin, and you scream anti-Muslim. Yes, they were all Muslim majority countries, but there are also groups in those countries that have sworn to use lax immigration to kill our citizens. And we do rely on those endpoints as part of our security and immigration systems.

You took a 20-year-old video of guy’s banter and parlayed it into Trump having a war on women. Against the prevalence of women in all of his businesses and campaign. Meanwhile you backed Clinton, who actively attacked her husband’s accusers and had a pretty damn big wage gap in her own campaign and her State department.

Meanwhile, there have been a lot of gains during the year+ in the sectors that benefit Hispanic workers. Have there been marked losses in wages or rights, other than abortion, for women? Or is it that abortion rights are now conflated with women’s health because the latter term is more impacting?

Did I choose to view Trump in a favorable light for all of that? Yep. Am I wholly in-the-bag for Trump? Hell no. But there is an entire 5th estate that constantly takes the negative for their views and analysis and that is getting very old. Especially when it plays out so frequently against American citizens that follow the rules and for people who are acting criminally to subvert our immigration, employment, and speech laws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
I was independent pre Trump. Registered as a Republican in Indiana in 2016 because I thought it was time for a more conservative budget. I was willing to deal with the awful social platform of republicans because I didn't think they would be able or have the appetite to make major social issue changes. When it became clear that Trump was the worst Republican candidate on social issues maybe ever and had no intention of being fiscally conservative I did the only thing a patriotic American could do. I voted Hillary Clinton because I knew Trump would be a disaster and I was right.

Whatever you say, liar
 
He was not the worst but he wasn't "good" either. Honestly, I don't think he has any "true values". He just spits out whatever he thinks the crowd he's speaking to wants to hear. I guess this can be said about a lot of politicians but he takes it to another level.

And HRC has true values! Yeah!

Deplorables!
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
You're so original!

It's just funny to hear big time HRC fans talk about Trump lacking values. She is a cretin who quite literally is every bit as bad as him, she's just more polished and does the season politician dance a lot better than him.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT